Key roles of insulin receptor InR1 in initiating reproductive diapause in males of the cabbage beetle Colaphellus bowringi (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).

BACKGROUND: Reproductive diapause serves as a valuable strategy enabling insects to survive unfavorable seasonal conditions. However, forcing insects into diapause when the environment is conducive to their well-being can cause them to miss out on seasonal opportunities for reproduction. This outcome not only reduces insect populations but also minimizes crop losses caused by insect feeding. Therefore, altering the timing of diapause initiation presents a potential strategy for managing pests. In this study, we examined the possible role of the Insulin Receptor 1 (InR1) in controlling reproductive diapause entry in the male cabbage beetle, Colaphellus bowringi. RESULTS: Compared to short-day (SD) conditions, long-day (LD) conditions led to reproductive diapause of C. bowringi males, characterized by arrested gonad development, increased Triglyceride (TG) accumulation, and upregulated expression of diapause protein 1 and genes associated with lipogenesis and stress tolerance. Upon employing RNA interference to knock down InR1 under SD conditions, males destined for reproduction were compelled into diapause, evidenced by arrested gonadal development, accumulation of TG, and elevated expression of diapause-related genes. Intriguingly, despite the common association of the absence of juvenile hormone (JH) with reproductive diapause in females, the knockdown of InR1 in males did not significant affect the expression of JH biosynthesis and JH response gene. CONCLUSION: The study highlight InR1 is a key factor involved in regulating male reproductive diapause in C. bowringi. Consequently, targeting insulin signaling could be a viable approach to perturb diapause timing, offering a promising strategy for managing pests with reproductive diapause capabilities. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.

Birth month associates with risk of coronary artery disease and its complications: A propensity score matched analysis / El mes de nacimiento se asocia con el riesgo de padecer una arteriopatía coronaria y sus complicaciones: análisis mediante propensity score

Objective: Birth month and climate affect lifetime disease risk, while the underlying mechanisms remain largely elusive. It is vital to investigate the risks of coronary artery disease (CAD) and its complications in patients born in different months. Methods: A total of 12,263 patient medical records were reviewed from the BioBank of First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, with 4729 records from patients with CAD (CAD group) and 7534 records from control patients without CAD (control group). Two groups of patients were matched by the propensity score matched method. Birth months were compared between two groups of patients. The relationships between birth month and the numbers of CAD and its complications were also investigated. Interestingly, we also explore the relationship between the birth seasons and the numbers of CAD and its complications. Results: Compared to control, CAD group had greater CAD risks for patients born in November (OR 1.390, 95% CI 1.090-1.772), December (OR 1.358, 95% CI 1.067-1.730), and February (OR 1.332, 95% CI 1.043-1.700) compared to those born in May. Compared to patients born in December, patients born in January to March and May to September had greater risk of heart failure (P<0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of myocardial infarction, conduction block, and atrial fibrillation across birth months (P>0.05). In terms of birth season, patients born in winter have greater CAD risk than those born in spring (OR 1.247, 95% CI 1.075-1.447). And there was no difference in the incidence of CAD complications across with birth seasons (P>0.05). Conclusions: There was a correlation between birth month and CAD. People born in November, December, and February had greater CAD risk, and people born in winter had greater CAD risk. Among CAD patients, those born in January to March and May to September had the greater risk of heart failure

Objetivo: El mes de nacimiento y el clima están relacionados con el riesgo de padecer una enfermedad crónica, aunque siguen desconociéndose en gran medida los mecanismos subyacentes. Resulta fundamental investigar los riesgos de padecer una arteriopatía coronaria (AC) y sus complicaciones en pacientes nacidos en distintos meses. Métodos: Se revisaron un total de 12.263 historias clínicas de pacientes extraídas del Biobanco del primer hospital afiliado de la Universidad Médica de Xinxiang, de las cuales 4.729 correspondían a pacientes con una AC (grupo con AC) y 7.534 correspondían a pacientes control sin una AC (grupo comparativo). Se emparejaron a 2 grupos de pacientes siguiendo el método de pareamiento por puntaje de propensión, y se compararon los meses de nacimiento de los pacientes de ambos grupos. También se investigó la relación existente entre el mes de nacimiento y el número de casos de AC y sus complicaciones. Resulta interesante destacar que también exploramos la relación existente entre las estaciones de nacimiento y el número de casos de AC y sus complicaciones. Resultados: En comparación con los pacientes del grupo comparativo, los pacientes del grupo con AC nacidos en noviembre (razón de posibilidades odds ratio [OR]: 1,390; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 1,090-1,772), diciembre (OR: 1,358; IC 95%: 1,067-1,730) y febrero (OR: 1,332; IC 95%: 1,043-1,700) presentaban un mayor riesgo de padecer una AC en comparación con los nacidos en mayo. En comparación con los pacientes nacidos en diciembre, los pacientes nacidos entre enero y marzo, y entre mayo y septiembre, presentaron un mayor riesgo de padecer una insuficiencia cardíaca (P<0,05). No se observaron diferencias en la incidencia de infarto de miocardio, bloqueo de la conducción y fibrilación auricular entre los distintos meses de nacimiento (P>0,05). En cuanto a la temporada de nacimiento, los pacientes nacidos en invierno presentaron un mayor riesgo de desarrollar una AC que los nacidos en primavera (OR: 1,247; IC 95%: 1,075-1,447). No se observaron diferencias en la incidencia de complicaciones de la AC entre las distintas temporadas de nacimiento (P>0,05). Conclusiones: Se observó una correlación entre el mes de nacimiento y la AC. Tanto las personas nacidas en los meses de noviembre, diciembre y febrero, como las nacidas en la temporada de invierno presentaron un mayor riesgo de padecer una AC. Entre los pacientes con AC, los nacidos entre enero y marzo, y entre mayo y septiembre, presentaron un mayor riesgo de padecer una insuficiencia cardíaca

Birth month associates with risk of coronary artery disease and its complications: A propensity score matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Birth month and climate affect lifetime disease risk, while the underlying mechanisms remain largely elusive. It is vital to investigate the risks of coronary artery disease (CAD) and its complications in patients born in different months. METHODS: A total of 12,263 patient medical records were reviewed from the BioBank of First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, with 4729 records from patients with CAD (CAD group) and 7534 records from control patients without CAD (control group). Two groups of patients were matched by the propensity score matched method. Birth months were compared between two groups of patients. The relationships between birth month and the numbers of CAD and its complications were also investigated. Interestingly, we also explore the relationship between the birth seasons and the numbers of CAD and its complications. RESULTS: Compared to control, CAD group had greater CAD risks for patients born in November (OR 1.390, 95% CI 1.090-1.772), December (OR 1.358, 95% CI 1.067-1.730), and February (OR 1.332, 95% CI 1.043-1.700) compared to those born in May. Compared to patients born in December, patients born in January to March and May to September had greater risk of heart failure (P<0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of myocardial infarction, conduction block, and atrial fibrillation across birth months (P>0.05). In terms of birth season, patients born in winter have greater CAD risk than those born in spring (OR 1.247, 95% CI 1.075-1.447). And there was no difference in the incidence of CAD complications across with birth seasons (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There was a correlation between birth month and CAD. People born in November, December, and February had greater CAD risk, and people born in winter had greater CAD risk. Among CAD patients, those born in January to March and May to September had the greater risk of heart failure.