Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 17(1): 258, 2022 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35526039

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies have given some pieces of evidence for the effect of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on knee proprioception of patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), but their results were conflicting. This review was performed to provide an updated evidence-based meta-analysis investigating the influence of TKA on knee proprioception. METHODS: The electronic databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were accessed from their inception to March 2020. Two reviewers identified the studies that met the selection criteria for this review. Information on study type, participants, follow-up time, and outcome measures was extracted. Methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers using the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0. Eleven studies with 475 participants were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: The I2 index assessed the heterogeneity between studies. The results showed that the pooled standard mean difference of mean angle of error was - 0.58° (95% CI - 1 to - 0.16; P = 0.007; I2 = 69%), and the joint position sense of KOA patients was better after TKA surgery than that before surgery. Pooled standard mean difference of displacement of center of pressure (COP) was - 0.39 (95% CI - 0.72 to - 0.06; P = 0.02; I2 = 51%), and KOA patients had better static balance after TKA surgery than before surgery. CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, no standardized comprehensive evaluation protocol presently exists though different assessment tools are available to measure proprioception. Contrasting results were found in the literature since some studies found that TKA improves proprioception in KOA patients, while others found no difference in proprioception. These differences are seen whether the proprioception was assessed by joint position sense (JPS), or it was indirectly assessed by static balance. However, the lack of sufficient data on the threshold to detect passive movement (TTDPM) and dynamic balance made it difficult to draw a conclusion about whether or not the sense of motion improved after surgery. The method for measuring and evaluating knee joint force sense is worth paying attention, which will make progress with knee proprioception on TKA patients.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Humans , Knee/surgery , Knee Joint/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Proprioception
2.
Orthop Surg ; 8(3): 360-6, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27627720

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of surgery and rehabilitation on patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Twelve patients and 12 healthy controls were enrolled and their clinical scores evaluated by a doctor. Gait data, including walking velocity, stride length, single support time, foot fall and swing power, were collected using a portable gait analyzer from 12 patients before and 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery and from 12 healthy controls. The gait data and clinical scores at selected time points were compared and correlations between gait characteristics and clinical scores assessed. RESULTS: Clinical knee and knee function scores increased significantly from before surgery to 6 weeks to 6 months after surgery (P < 0.001). The only significant differences identified were for single support time on the diseased side between before surgery and 6 months after surgery (P = 0.031) and for foot fall with the diseased side between 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery (P = 0.016). Foot fall and speed of the healthy or diseased sides were significantly different in patients at all time points from those of the healthy subjects (P < 0.05). Single support time on the diseased side was significantly different 6 months after surgery (P = 0.035) in patients than in healthy controls. Single support time on the healthy side before surgery was significantly different from that of healthy controls (P = 0.048) and 6 weeks after surgery (P = 0.042). Stride lengths differed significantly between patients and healthy subjects before surgery (healthy side: P = 0.007; diseased side: P = 0.008) and 6 weeks after surgery (healthy side: P = 0.001; diseased side: P = 0.001), but were not different at 6 months after surgery (healthy side: P = 0.088; diseased side: P = 0.077). The only significant correlations identified were between single support time with the diseased side of patients and their knee (r = 0.43, P = 0.032) and knee function scores (r = 0.493, P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: A portable gait analyzer appears to be suitable for evaluating the effects of TKA. Single support time on the diseased side may be a sensitive quantitative index for determining the effect of TKA and rehabilitation.


Subject(s)
Accelerometry/instrumentation , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Gait/physiology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/rehabilitation , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Outcome Assessment, Health Care
3.
Int J Clin Exp Med ; 8(6): 8347-57, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26309487

ABSTRACT

Fractures are important causes of healthy damage and economic loss nowadays. The conclusions of observational studies on tea consumption and fracture risk are still inconsistent. The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine the effect of tea drinking on the risk of fractures. In this study, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase and reference lists of the relevant articles. Observational studies that reported an estimate of the association between tea drinking and incidence of fractures were included. A meta-analysis was conducted by the STATA software. The results indicated that a total of 9 studies involving 147,950 individuals that examined the association between tea consumption and risk of fractures were included in this meta-analysis. The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. The pooled OR of 9 observational studies for the tea consumption on risk of fracture was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-1.04). In the subgroup analyses, no significant association was detected in neither cohort studies (n = 3; OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.06) nor case-control studies (n = 6; OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.70-1.19), respectively. Because of the varied and limited data of the included studies, we are not able to conduct the dose-response meta-analysis. In conclusion, tea consumption might be not associated with the risk of fractures. The following large-sample and well-designed studies are required to confirm the existing conclusions.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...