Long-term survival of the middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer patients after surgical treatment through left or right thoracic approach.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies with a high incidence and mortality in China, the main treatment for esophageal cancer at present is still surgery-based multimodality treatment, and surgery is still the most effective measure. However, the modes of surgical treatment for esophageal cancer have been diverse. The surgical approaches can be mainly divided into the left thoracic approach and right thoracic approach in China. The long-term survival of the patients treated through right approach was reported better than that through left thoracic approach, but until now no statistically significant difference was found between two approaches, especially, for those with middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer without suspected upper mediastinal lymph node metastasis in preoperative examinations, no definite conclusion have been made on selection of the approach, therefore, this studies try to compare the long-term survival between two approaches . METHODS: The data of 402 cases with complete resection and two-field lymph node dissection from January, 2011 to December, 2011 in the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences was retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and life-table in SPSS 22.0 and Stata 14.0 were used to analyze the survival. RESULTS: Totally, 402 cases were surgically treated either via left or right thoracic approach. The overall 5-year survival rate of this series was 38%, it was 37% in 281 cases surgically treated through left approach, and 39% in 121 cases through right approach (P=0.908). The 5-year survival of 256 patients without suspected lymph node metastasis in the upper mediastinum based on the preoperative examinations surgically treated through left approach was 38% versus 43% of 88 cases through right approach (P=0.404). After PSM, the 5-year survival of 110 cases surgically treated through left approach was 32% versus 40% of another matched 110 cases through right approach (P=0.146). for the patients without suspected lymph node metastasis in the upper mediastinum based on preoperative examinations, the 5-year survival of 88 surgically treated through left approach was 33% versus 44% of another matched 88 cases through right approach (P=0.239). CONCLUSIONS: For the middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer patients, whether or not who has suspected lymph node metastasis in the upper mediastinum based on preoperative CT and EUS, the surgical treatment through right thoracic approach can achieve better but not significantly better overall survival than that through left thoracic approach. Further prospective randomized clinical trials are still needed to verify this disputed issue on approach selection.

Unilateral absence of pulmonary artery associated with contralateral lung cancer.

Unilateral absence of a pulmonary artery (UAPA) is a rare congenital cardiac malformation that is often associated with other cardiovascular deformities. Surgical repair of this rare condition is usually performed only on the abnormal lung. The occurrence of lung cancer in association with UAPA is even rarer and clinical experience is very limited. This report aims to describe a case of unilateral absence of right pulmonary artery that was complicated by primary carcinoma of the contralateral lung. A left lower lobectomy was performed despite the absence of the right pulmonary artery and repeated decreases in the arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) were encountered intraoperatively. The current case provides insights into the operative tolerability and the foreseeable ominous prognosis after excision of the normal lung in patients with UAPA and highlights the importance of the clinical awareness of this potentially lethal congenital anomaly in light of its extreme rarity, which may facilitate better diagnosis and treatment of such patients.

[Comparison of the short-term outcomes of surgical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer via video assisted thoracoscopic surgery and open thoracotomy].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term outcomes of surgical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open thoracotomy (OT). METHODS: Data of 737 consecutive NSCLC patients who underwent surgical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and 630 patients who underwent pulmonary resection via open thoracotomy (as controls) in Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between January 2009 and August 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The risk factors after lobectomy were also analyzed. RESULTS: In the 506 NSCLC patients who received VATS lobectomy, postoperative complications occurred in 13 patients (2.6%) and one patient died of acute respiratory distress syndrome (0.2%). In the 521 patients who received open thoracotomy (OT) lobectomy, postoperative complications occurred in 21 patients (4.0%) and one patient died of pulmonary infection (0.2%). There was no significant difference in the morbidity rate (P > 0.05) and mortality rate (P > 0.05) between the VATS group and OT group. In the 190 patients who received VATS wedge resections, postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients (1.6%). One hundred and nine patients received OT wedge resections. Postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients (3.7%). There were no significant differences for morbidity rate (P = 0.262) between these two groups, and there was no perioperative death in these two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that age (OR = 1.047, 95%CI: 1.004 - 1.091), history of smoking (OR = 6.374, 95%CI: 2.588 - 15.695) and operation time (OR = 1.418, 95%CI: 1.075 - 1.871) were independent risk factors of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: To compare with the NSCLC patients who should undergo lobectomy or wedge resection via open thoracotomy, a similar short-term outcome can be achieved via VATS approach.

[Application of video assisted thoracic surgery for chest tumors: experience of 144 cases in a single institution].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the indication and safety of video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for chest tumors. METHODS: Data of 144 consecutive patients receiving VATS between January and November 2009 in Cancer hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: There was no conversion to open thoracotomy. Overall morbidity rate was 2.08% (3/144) and mortality rate was 0.69% (1/144). There were no significant differences for operative time, number of nodal dissection, morbidity rate, mortality rate, overall hospitalization and postoperative length of stay between VATS lobectomy group and open thoracotomy (OT) lobectomy group. Chest tube duration was shorter in the VATS lobectomy group than OT lobectomy group and more early-stage lung cancer patients were found in VATS group. There were no significant differences for number of nodal dissection, chest tube duration, morbidity rate, mortality rate, and postoperative length of stay between VATS lung wedge resection group and OT lung wedge resection group. Operative time and overall hospitalization were shorter in the VATS wedge resection group than OT wedge resection group. CONCLUSION: Morbidity and mortality rate of VATS were acceptable. VATS lobectomy can be used as an alternative surgical technique for early-stage lung cancer. For lung wedge resection, VATS was superior than OT.

[The rule of lymph node metastasis of adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rule of lymph node metastasis of adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung. METHODS: The data of 361 surgically treated patients with adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung from October 1965 to June 2003 were collected and retrospectively reviewed. The classification of regional lymph node stations and TNM stage were determined according to the UICC criteria (1997). The route and patterns as well as influencing factors of lymph node metastasis were analyzed by SPSS 10.0 software. The median follow-up period was 5.5 years (range, 1.4 to 23.4 years). RESULTS: The analysis of the route of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in the 361 cases showed that the tumor originated in the left upper lobe firstly metastasized to station 5 (A-P window), tumor in the right upper lobe to the station 4 (lower paratracheal), then secondly to station 7 (subcarinal), lastly to station 3 from the tumor in the left upper lobe or to the station 2 from the tumor in the right upper lobe. It was found that the tumors originated from the lower lobe, firstly metastasized to station 7, secondly to station 9 or 4 from the right lobe; or station 5 from left lower lobe, lastly to station 3 or 2 in the mediastinum. For the tumor in the middle lobe, mainly metastasized to station 7, 4 and 2. The skip mediastinal lymph node metastasis but N1 negative most commonly metastasized to station 7, then to station 4 from the tumor in the right lung and 5 from the tumor in the left lung. The prognosis of patients with a single skipping metastasis to mediastinal lymph node (N1-, SMLN) was better than that in the other patients with mediastinal lymph node metastases. CONCLUSION: The lung cancer growing in a different location has a different route and skipping metastasis to mediastinal lymph nodes. The patterns of lymph node metastasis affect prognosis. The prognosis of patients with single skipping metastasis to mediastinal lymph nodes but negative pulmonary hilar lymph node is better than that in the other patients with multiple station mediastinal lymph node metastases. The "N1-, SMLN" pattern ought to be considered as a special lymph nodal metastasis with better prognosis.

[Comparison of clinical and surgico-pathological TNM stage of 2007 lung cancer patients].

OBJECTIVE: An accurate clinical TNM staging of lung cancer is essential for the precise determination of the extent of the disease in order that an optimal therapeutic strategy can be planned. This is especially true in patients with marginally resectable tumors. Clinical over-staging of the disease may deny a patient the benefit of surgery, whereas under-staging may oblige a patient to accept a fruitless or even harmful surgery. We aimed to analyze preoperative clinical (c-TNM) and postoperative surgico-pathologic staging (p-TNM) of lung cancer patients in order to evaluate the accuracy of our clinical staging and its implications on the surgical strategy for lung cancer. METHODS: We did a retrospective comparison of c-TNM and p-TNM staging of 2007 patients with lung cancer surgically treated from January 1999 to May 2003. Preoperative evaluation and c-TNM staging of all patients were based on physical examination, laboratory studies, routine chest X-ray and CT scan of the chest and upper abdomen. Other examinations included sputum cytology, bronchoscopy, abdominal ultrasonography, bone scintiscan, brain CT/MRI, and mediastinoscopy whenever indicated. RESULTS: In the present study the comparison of c-TNM and p-TNM staging of 2007 patients with lung cancer revealed an overall concurrence rate of only 39.0%. In the entire series the extent of disease was clinically underestimated in 45.2% and overestimated in 15.8% of the patients. Among all c-TNM stages the c-IA/B stage of 1105 patients gave the highest rate (55.2%) of underestimating the extent of disease. Clinical staging of T subsets was relatively easy with an overall accuracy rate of 72.9%, while that of N subsets was relatively more difficult with an overall accuracy rate of 53.5%. Analysis also showed that c-IV stage may not be an absolute contraindication to surgery, because in half of the patients, c-M1 turned out to be p-M0, providing the possibility of resectional surgery depending on the status of T and N. CONCLUSION: For reasons to be further determined, the present preoperative clinical TNM staging of lung cancer remains a crude evaluation. Further efforts to improve its accuracy are needed.

[Screening and identification of human lung cancer-related antigens].

One of the cardinal questions in tumor immunology is the identification of antigenic structures in human tumors that are recognized by host immune system. A powerful new methodology for identifying human tumor antigens eliciting humoral immune response is SEREX (serological identification of antigen by recombinant cDNA expression cloning). Here, by using this method, a recombinant cDNA expression library from lung cancer was analysed and several new tumor antigens were isolated. Using the lambda-ZAP vector, cDNA expression library was constructed from lung cancer tissues of three patients including a moderately differentiated lung adenocarcinoma, a highly differentiated lung squamous cell carcinoma and a moderately differentiated lung adeno-squamous carcinoma. The primary library consisted of 0.8 x 10(6) recombinants. 33 positive clones encoding antigen genes were obtained after immunoscreening, and the nucleotide sequences of cDNA inserts were determined and analysed with DNASIS and BLAST softwares in EMBL and GenBank. These antigen genes included known genes, such as MAGE (melanoma antigen gene), vitiligo-associated protein VIT-1, fibronectin, Na-K-ATPase et al and unknown genes or ESTs. To characterize expression profile of these genes, antibodies in sera from 48 lung cancer patients and 48 health donors were assayed with three antigens (L-8, L-19, L-51) to screen specific and relative serum markers for lung cancer. The results show that positive rates in lung cancer patients are higher than in health donors. Our research indicates that some of these antigens may be related to lung cancer and may be valuable tumor markers in diagnosis of lung cancer.