Reconstruction of Heel Soft Tissue Defects Using Medial Plantar Artery Island Pedicle Flap: Clinical Experience and Outcomes Analysis.

We report our clinical experience with 11 cases of heel soft tissue defects treated with a medial plantar artery island pedicle flap. We also evaluated the functional outcomes of reconstruction. We enrolled 11 patients (10 [90.9%] males and 1 [9.1%] female), who received a medial plantar artery island pedicle flap for heel soft tissue defects from August 2010 to July 2014. The cause of the defects included trauma (post-traumatic heel skin necrosis) in 2 (18.2%) patients, infection (calcaneal osteomyelitis with overlying soft tissue infection) in 2 (18.2%) patients, and tumor (stage IA melanoma) in 7 (63.6%) patients. The mean average size of the defect was 3.7 cm × 4.4 cm (range 3.1 cm × 4.0 cm to 4.5  cm × 5.5  cm). The mean follow-up period was 19.6 (range 8 to 35) months, and all flaps survived within that period. The mean static 2-point discrimination was 34.4 (range 29 to 40) mm at the heel and 17.2 mm at the distal sole. The mean visual analog scale score for the aesthetic appearance of the reconstructed heel was 9 (range 8 to 9.5). The average revised Foot Function Index score was 25.8 (range 21 to 37). The medial plantar artery island pedicle flap is a versatile and effective method for reconstructing heel soft tissue defects.

A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications of Primary Fingertip Reconstruction Using Reverse-Flow Homodigital Island Flaps.

BACKGROUND: Fingertip reconstruction using reverse-flow homodigital island flaps has been very popular over the years. However, the outcomes of reconstruction have not been clearly understood. In these circumstances, a systematic review of available literature is warranted. OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes and complications of fingertip reconstruction using reverse-flow homodigital island flaps. To justify the usage of reverse-flow homodigital island flaps for fingertip reconstruction. SEARCH METHODS: A PubMed [MEDLINE] electronic database was searched (1985 to 15 April 2015). SELECTION/ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Retrospective case series that met the following criteria were included: (1) Study reported primary data; (2) Study included at least five cases of fingertip defects treated using reverse-flow homodigital island flaps; (3) Study reported outcomes and complications of fingertip reconstruction, either primary or delayed, using reverse-flow homodigital island flaps; (4) The study presented at least one of the following functional outcomes: Static two-point discrimination, return-to-work time, range of motion of distal interphalangeal joints; (5) The study presented at least one complication. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed search results, and two other review authors analyzed the data and resolved disagreements. The following endpoints were analyzed: survival rate of the flap, sensibility, and functional outcomes and complications. MAIN RESULT: Eight studies were included in this review. The included studies were published between 1995 and 2014, and a total of 207 patients with 230 fingertip defects were reported. The overall survival rate of the flap was 98 % (including partial survival). The mean static two-point discrimination (2PD) was 7.2 mm. The average range of motion of the DIP joint was 63°. The average return-to-work time was 7 weeks after injury. On average, 2 % of the patient had complete flap necrosis, 5 % had partial flap necrosis, 4 % developed venous congestion, 4 % developed flexion contracture, and 12 % experienced mild-to-moderate cold intolerance. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Survival of reconstructed fingertips (98 %) is better with reverse-flow homodigital island flaps than fingertip replantation (86 %). The sensibility outcome using sensate flaps (mean s2PD = 7.2 mm) is similar to the sensibility outcome following replantation (mean s2PD = 7 mm). The common complications include cold intolerance, venous congestion, and flexion contracture. Therefore, reverse-flow homodigital island flaps may not be the ideal choice but are a very reliable alternative for fingertip reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Second toe microsurgical free-flap for aesthetic and sensory reconstruction of palmar soft tissue defects of fingers.

OBJECTIVES: To illustrate the surgical methods and clinical efficacy of microsurgical free-flaps obtained from second toe for the reconstruction of palmar soft-tissue defect of fingers. METHODS: We enrolled 22 patients (13 men and 9 women), who received second toe free-flap for 22 finger defects between August 2007 and July 2013. The average age was 35 years (range, 18-62 years). The average size of flap was 2.7 cm × 2.0 cm (range, 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm-3.5 cm × 2.5 cm). RESULTS: All flaps survived well without any complications. Follow-up period ranged from 8 to 30 months (mean 15 months). The Visual Analog Scale for flap appearance (VAS flap) was ranged from 8 to 10 (average, 9.5). Based on the CISS questionnaires, 6 cases had mild cold intolerance. The average value of Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHOQ) scoring for overall hand function was 8 (range, 5-13). The sensibility outcomes in 10 patients who underwent nerve repair were satisfactory. Average value of static two point discrimination (2PD) was 6.4 mm (range, 4-10 mm) and SWM test was 3.45 (range 2.83-4.12). CONCLUSIONS: Second toe free micro-flap is a very useful and reliable alternative for the reconstruction of palmer soft-tissue defect of fingers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Aesthetic and sensory reconstruction of finger pulp defects using free toe flaps.

BACKGROUND: This study illustrates aesthetic and sensory reconstruction of finger pulp defects with free toe flaps from the lateral aspect of the great toe or the medial aspect of the second toe. METHODS: Between August 2007 and July 2010, free toe flaps were harvested and used for 21 fingers of 21 patients. The average patient age was 34.5 years (range 19-62 years). The soft tissue defects were found in the thumb of 6 patients, the index finger of 7 patients, the middle finger of 5 patients, and the ring finger of 3 patients. The donor site was the great toe for 9 patients and the second toe for 12 patients. The average flap size was 2.8 × 2.0 cm (range 1.7 × 1.7 to 3.5 × 3.0 cm). Restoration of the sensitivity, aesthetic appearance, and mobility of the injured fingers compared with the opposite side was assessed using appropriate tools during the follow-up time. RESULTS: All the flaps in this series survived completely, with a high survival rate of 100 %. No urgent operative revision necessitated by postoperative thrombosis of the vessels was performed during the follow-up period. During a mean follow-up period of 18.4 months (range 12-24 months), the average static two-point discrimination score for the injured finger pulp was 4.8 mm (range 3-7 mm), and the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire score was 4.9 mm. The mean range of motion of the distal interphalangeal joint in the injured finger was 69.7°. CONCLUSION: Transplantation of free microvascular flaps from the great toe or the second toe is a useful and reliable technique for finger pulp defect reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Treatment of distal fingertip degloving injuries using a cross-finger flap based on the dorsal branch of the proper digital artery at the middle phalanx.

This study reports our experience with reconstruction of distal fingertip degloving injuries using a single cross-finger flap based on the dorsal branch of the proper digital artery at the middle phalanx. From January 2009 to October 2011, 18 patients (18 fingers) presented with distal fingertip degloving injuries and were treated with this technique. The mean size of the soft tissue defects was 4.5 cm in length and 2.0 cm in width. The mean size of the cross-finger flaps was 4.7 × 2.1 cm. In the series, all flaps survived completely. No complication was reported, and no further flap debunking procedure was required. At the mean follow-up period of 20.5 months (range, 12-48 mo), the mean static two-point discrimination was 6.3 mm (range, 5-9 mm) of the reconstructed finger pulp. The total range of active motion of the proximal and the distal interphalangeal joints of the donor fingers were 105 and 77.4 degrees, respectively. The cross-finger flap based on the dorsal branch of the proper digital artery at the middle phalanx is a reliable and simple method in reconstruction of distal degloving injuries of the finger.