Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biomark Med ; 12(6): 607-618, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29707986

ABSTRACT

AIM: The two genders are different ranging from the molecular to the phenotypic levels. But most studies did not use this important information. We hypothesize that the integration of gender information may improve the overall prediction accuracy. MATERIALS & METHODS: A comprehensive comparative study was carried out to test the hypothesis. The classification of the stages I + II versus III + IV of the clear cell renal cell carcinoma samples was formulated as an example. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: In most cases, female-specific model significantly outperformed both-gender model, as similarly for the male-specific model. Our data suggested that gender information is essential for building biomedical classification models and even a simple strategy of building two gender-specific models may outperform the gender-mixed model.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , DNA Methylation , Early Detection of Cancer , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Sex Characteristics , Adult , Biomarkers/metabolism , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/physiopathology , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Phenotype
2.
Biomark Med ; 12(3): 205-215, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29424557

ABSTRACT

AIM: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous-cell carcinoma (LUSC) are two major subtypes of lung cancer and constitute about 70% of all the lung cancer cases. The patient's lifespan and living quality will be significantly improved if they are diagnosed at an early stage and adequately treated. METHODS & RESULTS: This study comprehensively screened the proteomic dataset of both LUAD and LUSC, and proposed classification models for the progression stages of LUAD and LUSC with accuracies 86.51 and 89.47%, respectively. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION: A comparative analysis was also carried out on related transcriptomic datasets, which indicates that the proposed biomarkers provide discerning power for accurate stage prediction, and will be improved when larger-scale proteomic quantitative technologies become available.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Proteome/metabolism , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Disease Progression , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Models, Theoretical , Proteomics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...