Janus Kinase Inhibitor Therapy and Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Autoimmune Disease.

Importance: The involvement of chronic inflammation in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) opens therapeutic possibilities to AMD management. Objective: To determine whether Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are associated with a reduced risk of AMD development in patients with autoimmune diseases. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective observational cohort study used administrative claims data from Merative MarketScan research databases (Commercial and Medicare Supplemental) and Optum Clinformatics Data Mart databases between January 1, 2010, and January 31, 2022. Patients with autoimmune diseases satisfying study eligibility criteria and who received JAKi treatment (9126 in MarketScan and 5667 in Optum) were propensity score matched (1:1) to identical numbers of study-eligible patients who received non-JAKi-based immunotherapy. Exposure: Treatment duration of 6 months or longer. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence rates of AMD (exudative and nonexudative) over the first 6 to 18 months of treatment were determined, and bayesian Poisson regression models were used to estimate incidence rate ratios, 95% CIs, and posterior probabilities of AMD. Results: After matching, female sex represented the majority of the patient population in both MarketScan and Optum (14 019/18 252 [76.6%] and 8563/3364 [75.2%], respectively in the JAKi patient population). More than 60% of the patient population was older than 55 years of age in both cohorts. Over the specified treatment period, a 49% relative reduction in incidence of AMD was observed among patients who received JAKi therapy (10/9126 events; adjusted incidence rate ratio [AIRR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.19-0.90) vs those who received non-JAKi therapy (43/9126 events; AIRR, 1 [reference]) in MarketScan, and a 73% relative reduction in incidence of AMD was observed among patients who received JAKi therapy (3/5667 events; AIRR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.03-0.74) vs those who received non-JAKi therapy (21/5667 events; AIRR, 1 [reference]) in Optum. The absolute percentage reductions were 0.36% (MarketScan) and 0.32% (Optum), favoring patients who received JAKi therapy. Posterior probabilities of the adjusted risk being less than unity were 97.6% (MarketScan) and 98.9% (Optum) for those who received JAKi therapy vs those who received non-JAKi therapy in MarketScan and Optum, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: JAKi use may be associated with a reduced risk of incident AMD in US adults with major autoimmune diseases. The absolute percentage reduction is consistent with a potential role for JAKi in this population. Future studies with long-term follow-up are recommended to investigate the association between JAKi use and incident AMD in other disease indications. Investigation into the role of systemic inflammation and JAK-signal transducers and activators of transcription signaling in AMD may improve understanding of the pathophysiology of AMD and lead to new treatment options.

Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Non-Responsive to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment in Ontario, Canada.

Purpose: To understand the demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, visual and anatomic responses of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) initially treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in the real-world clinical setting. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records to identify consecutively presenting patients with DME who received their first documented anti-VEGF injection (index injection) on or after 1 October 2015 and before 30 September 2016 (index period) at 4 clinical sites in Ontario, Canada. Patients receiving anti-VEGF injections in the study eye were followed for ≥18 months. After the first 3 monthly injections, patients were classified as "responder" (≥20% reduction in central retinal thickness [CRT] from index date) or "nonresponder" (<20% reduction in CRT) to anti-VEGF treatment. Results: At 12 months, change from baseline (CFB) in best visual acuity (BVA) of responders (n = 30) was mean (SD) 12.8 (13.00) letters; CFB in nonresponders (n = 56) was 3.2 (16.3) letters. Sensitivity analyses stratified by initial BVA were supportive. Mean (SD) change in CRT (µm) was -160.4 (111.4) in responders and -62.2 (98.6) in nonresponders. While changes in anti-VEGF therapy were lower in responders versus nonresponders (10.0% vs 23.2%), mean number of injections was similar (8.3 in each cohort). Conclusion: Despite receiving a substantial number of injections and requiring changes in therapy more frequently, nonresponders showed a lack of clinically meaningful change in BVA and CRT. Nonresponders could be identified after 3 anti-VEGF injections. There remains an unmet need for treatment options in patients with DME who show a nonresponse after 3 months of anti-VEGF treatment.

Topical Medication Adherence and Visual Field Progression in Open-angle Glaucoma: Analysis of a Large US Health Care System.

PRCIS: Modeling of visual field and pharmacy data (Kaiser Permanente, 2001 to 2014) from open-angle/pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients in clinical practice indicated a significant inverse association between the level of medication adherence and rate of visual field progression. PURPOSE: The aim was to quantify the effect of nonadherence to topical hypotensive medication on glaucomatous visual field progression in clinical practice. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of combined visual field and pharmacy data from Kaiser Permanente Southern California's HealthConnect electronic health record database. Patients with a diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma or pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (2001 to 2011) and ≥3 subsequent visual field tests of the same Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm type were followed up from first medication fill to final visual field test. Medication adherence (proportion of days covered) was estimated from pharmacy refill data. A conditional growth model was used to estimate the effect of adherence level in modifying the progression of mean deviation over time after adjusting for potential confounders, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, baseline glaucoma severity, and comorbidity. RESULTS: In total, 6343 eligible patients were included in the study and followed for (mean) 5.8 years; average treatment adherence during follow-up was 73%. After controlling for confounders and the interaction between time and baseline disease severity, the model indicated that mean deviation progression was significantly (P=0.006) reduced by 0.006 dB per year for each 10% (absolute) increase in adherence. Model estimates of time to glaucoma progression (mean deviation change -3 dB from baseline) were 8.3 and 9.3 years for patients with adherence levels of 20% and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Improving patient adherence to topical glaucoma medication may result in slower deterioration in visual function over time.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs in Patients with Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: Geographic atrophy (GA) is an advanced form of nonexudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) that lacks treatment options. With considerable interpatient variability in the rate of GA progression due to lesion characteristics, information characterizing the disease burden is limited. The aim of this study was to describe the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with increasing severity levels of GA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using claims data from IQVIA's PharMetrics Plus database. Patients with a prevalent GA diagnosis were identified between October 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017 and classified by disease severity and laterality. Disease-specific HCRU and costs by disease severity were assessed during the 12-month follow-up period, with multivariable analyses performed adjusting for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 28,773 GA cases were identified (mean age = 68.7; 58.5% female), of which 24% and 76% had unilateral and bilateral GA, respectively, with varying levels of recorded severity (in increasing order): early or intermediate (EI) AMD, GA without subfoveal involvement (GAwoSF), and GA with subfoveal involvement (GAwSF). Patients with greater baseline severity in the bilateral group had a significantly higher number of outpatient (OP) visits per year (1.98 EI AMD; 2.57 for GAwoSF; 2.63 for GAwSF). Increasing disease severity was associated with higher patient-related costs in the outpatient setting (mean [SD] of $82 [$157], $110 [$559] for unilateral EI AMD and GAwSF, respectively, and $56 [$94], $64 [$97], $59 [$85] for bilateral EI AMD, GAwoSF, GAwSF, respectively). Similarly, higher payer-related costs were seen in patients with bilateral GAwSF compared to bilateral EI AMD (mean [SD] $280 [$325]; $198 [$262]). CONCLUSION: Study findings demonstrate that patients, with more severe GA at baseline, experience greater HCRU and costs in the outpatient setting. Further research should explore specific contributing factors to the long-term economic burden of GA.

Burden of illness and healthcare resource use in United States patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis.

INTRODUCTION: We analyzed the burden of illness of sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) patients and the costs to the healthcare system. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of 333 sIBM patients aged ≥ 50 years was performed using United States (U.S.) claims data. sIBM patients were matched in a 1:5 ratio to randomly selected individuals with ≥1 healthcare encounter within the year of index date. RESULTS: sIBM patients presented with higher rates of disease- and muscle-related conditions, such as myalgia, myositis, muscle weakness, dysphagia, pneumonia, and falls. Use of healthcare resources, including physical therapy, office visits, emergency room (ER) visits, and hospitalizations, was greater in sIBM patients. This was also reflected in significantly higher overall healthcare costs in the sIBM population driven mainly by more all-cause office visits, all-cause ER visits and hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: sIBM imposes a substantial burden on U.S. patients in terms of additional healthcare usage and associated costs. Muscle Nerve 56: 861-867, 2017.

Factors associated with adherence to oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United Kingdom.

To evaluate adherence to oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of a UK clinical database. The mean proportion of days covered was 73.5%, and 60.1% of patients were adherent. Younger age and fewer concomitant medications were negatively associated with the likelihood of being adherent.

Factors associated with adherence to oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To estimate the rate of adherence to oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes in the US and describe factors associated with adherence in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort analysis, patients aged 18 years or older with a type 2 diabetes diagnosis received between 1 January 2007 and 31 March 2010 were identified using a large US-based health care claims database. The index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy during this period. Patients had to have continuous enrollment in the claims database for 12 months before and after the index date. Adherence was assessed using proportion of days covered (PDC) and an adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with adherence (PDC ≥80%). RESULTS: Of the 133,449 eligible patients, the mean age was 61 years and 51% were men. Mean PDC was 75% and the proportion of patients adherent to oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy was 59%. Both mean PDC and PDC ≥80% increased with increasing age and the number of concomitant medications, and were slightly higher in men compared to women. Results from the logistic regression demonstrate an increased likelihood of non-adherence for patients who were younger, new to therapy, on a twice-daily dose, female, or on fewer than three concomitant medications compared to their reference groups. Higher average daily out-of-pocket pharmacy expense was also associated with an increased likelihood of non-adherence. All results were statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Patient characteristics, treatment regimens, and out-of-pocket expenses were associated with adherence to oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy in our study.

Limitations of real-world treatment with atorvastatin monotherapy for lowering LDL-C in high-risk cardiovascular patients in the US.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines endorse statin therapy for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to recommended levels, in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, if needed, after lifestyle changes. Atorvastatin is a common statin with greater LDL-C lowering efficacy than most other statins; its availability in generic form will likely increase its use. This study assessed attainment of guideline-recommended LDL-C levels in high-risk CVD patients treated with atorvastatin monotherapy. METHODS: Analyses of two retrospective US cohorts of patients who received a prescription for atorvastatin monotherapy between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2010 (index date defined as first prescription date) in the GE Centricity Electronic Medical Record (EMR) (N=10,693) and Humana Medicare (N=16,798) databases. Eligible patients were ≥18 years, diagnosed with coronary heart disease or atherosclerotic vascular disease, with ≥1 LDL-C measurement between 3 months and 1 year postindex date, and continuously enrolled for 1 year prior to and following the index date. RESULTS: Of the eligible patients, 21.8%, 29.6%, 29.9%, and 18.7% (GE Centricity EMR) and 25.4%, 32.9%, 27.8%, and 14.0% (Humana Medicare) received 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg doses of atorvastatin, respectively. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) follow-up LDL-C levels were 2.1±0.8 mmol/L (83±30 mg/dL) and 2.3±0.8 mmol/L (88±31 mg/dL) for the GE Centricity EMR and Humana Medicare cohorts, respectively. Regardless of dose, only 28.3%-34.8% of patients had LDL-C levels <1.8 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL), and 72.0%-78.0% achieved LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) in both cohorts. As many as 41% and 13% of patients had LDL-C levels ≥0.5 mmol/L (≥20 mg/dL) above LDL-C 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) and 2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL), respectively, in both cohorts; these percentages were generally similar across atorvastatin doses. CONCLUSION: In this real-world US setting, a large number of high-risk CVD patients did not attain guideline-recommended LDL-C levels with atorvastatin monotherapy. More than 65% of the patients had LDL-C levels >1.8 mmol/L (>70 mg/dL), and of these, 30%-40% had LDL-C levels ≥0.5 mmol/L (≥20 mg/dL) above this, regardless of dose. This suggests that more effective lipid-lowering strategies, such as statin uptitration, switching to a higher efficacy statin, and/or combination therapy, may be required to achieve optimal LDL-C lowering in high-risk patients.

LDL-C levels in US patients at high cardiovascular risk receiving rosuvastatin monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Statin therapy is recommended as the first-line pharmacotherapeutic approach for lowering LDL-C levels in patients at high cardiovascular risk. OBJECTIVE: To assess LDL-C levels among patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with rosuvastatin monotherapy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used patient records from the GE Centricity Electronic Medical Records (GE Centricity EMR) database and administrative claims data from Humana Medicare to identify patients at high cardiovascular risk with a first prescription for rosuvastatin monotherapy (index date) from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2010. Eligible adult patients had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis or a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) procedure code indicating coronary heart disease or atherosclerotic vascular disease, ≥1 LDL-C measurement 3 to 12 months after the index date, and continuous data during 1-year baseline and 1-year follow-up. Mean LDL-C levels and distribution of patients around <70 mg/dL and <100 mg/dL thresholds overall and by daily rosuvastatin dose were assessed. RESULTS: Among 6004 GE Centricity EMR patients (mean [SD] age, 66 [10] years; 56% men) and 11,320 Humana Medicare patients (mean [SD] age, 74 [8] years; 44% men) who met selection criteria, the most frequently prescribed rosuvastatin dose was 10 mg, and the mean (SD) follow-up LDL-C level was 89 (37) mg/dL for GE Centricity EMR patients and 92 (36) mg/dL for Humana Medicare patients. Overall, lower mean LDL-C levels were observed as rosuvastatin dose increased. However, less than one-third of GE Centricity EMR and Humana Medicare patients had an LDL-C level <70 mg/dL, and approximately two-thirds had an LDL-C level <100 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: More effective lipid-lowering strategies, such as statin up-titration or combination therapy, may be needed to achieve therapeutic goals in a substantial proportion of high-risk patients.

Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in high-risk patients treated with atorvastatin monotherapy in the United Kingdom: analysis of a primary-care database.

OBJECTIVE: British clinical guidelines recommend statins as first-line lipid-modifying treatment (LMT) for patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We undertook an observational study to assess total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in high-risk patients who were treated with atorvastatin monotherapy by UK general practitioners. METHODS: This retrospective database study included patients with a prescription for atorvastatin monotherapy between November 30, 2008, and November 30, 2011, with the index date defined as the first atorvastatin prescription during this period. Eligible high-risk patients with evidence of coronary heart disease (CHD), atherosclerotic vascular disease (AVD), diabetes mellitus (DM), or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) were required to have ≥1 TC and LDL-C measurement between 3 and 12 months after the index date, and continuous enrollment 1 year before and 1 year after the index date. Cholesterol levels were assessed using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines: TC <4.0 mmol/L or LDL-C <2.0 mmol/L. RESULTS: Of 2999 high-risk patients (60.2% men; mean [SD] age = 67.9 [10.6] years) meeting selection criteria, 23.9% 28.2%, 36.2%, and 11.6% received prescriptions for atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg, respectively (percentages do not sum to 100 because of rounding). Across all doses, the mean (SD) follow-up TC was 4.08 (0.80) mmol/L and LDL-C 2.08 (0.65) mmol/L. A large proportion of patients (88.8%) had TC < 5.0 mmol/L. However, only 45.8% had TC < 4.0 mmol/L, and 46.5% had LDL-C < 2.0 mmol/L. Although a larger proportion of patients with CHD/AVD + DM reached guideline-recommended lipid levels, only 63.7% of such patients had TC < 4.0 or LDL-C < 2.0 mmol/L, which are the current targets for this subgroup as recommended by NICE. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of UK high-CVD-risk patients receiving atorvastatin monotherapy achieved guideline-recommended treatment targets for TC, and less than two-thirds of patients with CHD/AVD + DM had values below TC (4.0 mmol/L) or LDL-C (2.0 mmol/L) targets. More effective lipid-lowering strategies may be warranted to optimize cholesterol lowering and target attainment in high-risk patients. Limitations of this study include its retrospective, observational nature.

Impact of UK Medical Eligibility Criteria implementation on prescribing of combined hormonal contraceptives.

OBJECTIVES: Combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) are the most widely prescribed contraceptive methods in the UK; however, their use is associated with significant cardiovascular risk for women with some medical conditions and risk factors. The objective of this study was to assess the potential change in CHC prescribing among higher-risk women following publication of the UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (UKMEC) in 2006. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using the General Practice Research Database to analyse UK women aged 15-49 years who were prescribed CHCs during the period 2004-2010. Of women prescribed CHCs, those at higher risk of cardiovascular events (with UKMEC Category 3 or 4 risk factors) were identified. The percentage of higher-risk CHC users, among all CHC users, in 2005 (pre-UKMEC) was compared to that in 2010 (post-UKMEC). RESULTS: The percentage of higher-risk CHC users significantly decreased by 0.8% (95% CI 0.68% to 1.02%) following publication of UKMEC [8.1% (95% CI 7.98% to 8.22%) in 2005 vs 7.3% (95% CI 7.14% to 7.38%) in 2010; p<0.001]. However, an estimated 1 74 472 women in the UK were prescribed CHCs in 2010 despite having Category 3 or 4 risk factors. The most common Category 3 or 4 risk factors were body mass index ≥35 kg/m(2), hypertension and smoking in women aged ≥35 years. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the observed reduction in prescribing of CHCs to higher-risk women after publication of UKMEC, a large number of women with Category 3 or 4 risk factors are still prescribed CHCs. The increased risk of cardiovascular events is unnecessary for many of these women given the availability of alternative contraceptive methods.

Association between hypoglycemia and inpatient mortality and length of hospital stay in hospitalized, insulin-treated patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of hypoglycemia on clinical outcomes among hospitalized, insulin-treated patients. METHODS: In a retrospective study, hospitalizations in 2005-2007 were identified from a US inpatient electronic medical records database. All encounters for insulin-treated patients with valid blood glucose measurement were included, except for those with a length of stay <24 hours or >30 days. In an encounter-based analysis, associations between hypoglycemic (glucose ≤70 mg/dL) or severe hypoglycemic (glucose ≤50 mg/dL) episodes and inpatient mortality, ischemic events, neurologic complications, and length of stay were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 107,312 admissions, hypoglycemia occurred in 21,561 (20%) and severe hypoglycemia in 7539 (7%). Inpatient mortality occurred in 6.5% of hospitalizations with hypoglycemia and 3.8% of those without (p < 0.001). Inpatient mortality occurred in 7.6% of hospitalizations with a severe hypoglycemic event. Ischemic events (8.1 vs. 8.0%) and neurologic complications (3.8 vs. 3.7%) were similar in hospitalizations with and without a hypoglycemic event, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusting for age, gender, and selected comorbidities, hypoglycemia was associated with a significant increase in inpatient mortality risk (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.66 [95% CI: 1.55, 1.78]). Similar results were observed with severe hypoglycemia (adjusted OR = 1.44 [1.38, 1.52]). Length of stay was increased in hospitalizations with hypoglycemia (median [interquartile range]: 8.2 days [4.9, 13.9] vs. 5.2 days [3.1, 8.3]; p < 0.0001). LIMITATIONS: Due to the nature of the data source, some data of interest were not available, including insulin dose and dose regimen, outpatient medical histories (including diabetes history), pre-hospitalization medications, and cause of death. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoglycemia was common among hospitalized patients receiving insulin and, while a direct causal relationship cannot be assumed, was associated with an increased risk of inpatient mortality and increased length of hospital stay. Hypoglycemia is an undesirable event and efforts to minimize in-hospital hypoglycemic events are warranted across the spectrum of hospitalized patients.

Factors associated with initiation of antihyperglycaemic medication in UK patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To assess the factors associated with antihyperglycaemic medication initiation in UK patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were identified during the index period of 2003-2005. Eligible patients were ≥ 30 years old at the date of the first observed diabetes diagnosis (referred to as index date) and had at least 2 years of follow-up medical history (N = 9,158). Initiation of antihyperglycaemic medication (i.e., treatment) was assessed in the 2-year period following the index date. Adjusted Cox regression models were used to examine the association between time to medication initiation and patient age and other factors. RESULTS: Mean (SD) HbA1c at diagnosis was 8.1% (2.3). Overall, 51% of patients initiated antihyperglycaemic medication within 2 years (65%, 55%, 46% and 40% for patients in the 30- < 45, 45- < 65, 65- < 75, 75+ age groups, respectively). Among the treated patients, median (25th, 75th percentile) time to treatment initiation was 63 (8, 257) days. Of the patients with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% at diagnosis, 87% initiated treatment within 2 years. These patients with a higher HbA1c also had shorter time to treatment initiation (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 2.44 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.61, 3.70]; p < 0.0001). Increasing age (in years) was negatively associated with time to treatment initiation (HR = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.99]; p < 0.001). Factors significantly associated with shorter time to treatment initiation included female gender and use of cardiovascular medications at baseline or initiated during follow up. CONCLUSIONS: In this UK cohort of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, only 51% had antihyperglycaemic medication initiated over a 2-year period following diagnosis. Older patients were significantly less likely to have been prescribed antihyperglycaemic medications. Elevated HbA1c was the strongest factor associated with initiating antihyperglycaemic medication in these patients.

Compliance and persistence with concomitant statin and oral antihyperglycemic therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare compliance and persistence with statin and oral antihyperglycemic therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes who received concomitant therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using a large US commercial claims database. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes and dispensed prescriptions for both statin and oral antihyperglycemic therapies on the same date in 2006 (index date = first date of such dispensing) were included in the analysis (N = 52,414). Patients were required to have continuous enrollment in the database for 1 year prior to (baseline) and 2 years after (follow-up) index date. The 2-year medication possession ratio (MPR) was compared between statin and oral antihyperglycemic therapy. For the persistence analysis, treatment discontinuation was defined by a gap >30 days between the last date of supply from previous dispensing and subsequent refill. The likelihood of discontinuation of statin versus oral antihyperglycemic therapy was estimated by fitting a robust Cox proportional hazards regression model, adjusted for baseline variables. RESULTS: The 2-year MPR was 70% for statin and 78% for oral antihyperglycemic therapy (P <.0001). The proportion of patients with a 2-year MPR >80% was 52% for statin and 63% for oral antihyperglycemic therapy (P <.0001). The median time to discontinuation of statin was significantly shorter compared with oral antihyperglycemic therapy (284 vs 495 days, P <.001). There was a greater risk to discontinue statin than oral antihyperglycemic therapy (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.47 [95% confidence interval 1.45-1.48]). CONCLUSIONS: Compliance and persistence with statin therapy significantly lagged behind oral antihyperglycemic therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated concomitantly with both therapies.