Association of Tear Cytokine Ratios with Symptoms and Signs of Dry Eye Disease: Biomarker Data from the Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between tear inflammatory cytokine ratios (CRs) and signs and symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) to investigate the possible use of tear CRs, which may better address the complexity of cytokine interactions than absolute cytokine levels, as a DED biomarker. METHODS: Tear concentrations of IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, IFN-g, and TNF-a were measured using standardized procedures, as were DED signs (corneal and conjunctival staining scores, tear break-up time, Schirmer test, Meibomian gland plugging, tear osmolarity, composite sign severity score) and symptoms [Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)]. Ratios between pro-inflammatory (IL-1b, IL-8, IL-17A, IFN-g, and TNF-a) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines were calculated. Given its opposing roles in inflammation, IL-6 was tested as both a pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine. Correlations between CR and DED symptoms and signs were calculated using Spearman correlation coefficients (rho). RESULTS: At baseline, 131 patients, 80.2% female and mean age 54.2 years (SD 14.1, range 20-82), from 10 sites of the Dry Eye Assessment and Management study had sufficient tear volumes ≥4 µL for analysis. IL-6:IL-10, IL-8:IL-10, and TNF-a:IL-10 had some significant correlations, mostly with conjunctival or corneal staining or the composite sign severity score (IL-8:IL-10 and conjunctival staining: rho = 0.19, p = 0.03; IL-6:IL-10 and corneal staining: rho = 0.31, p < 0.001; IL-8:IL-10 and corneal staining: rho = 0.21, p = 0.01; IL-6:IL-10 and composite sign severity score: rho = 0.26, p = 0.003; IL-8:IL-10 and composite sign severity score: rho = 0.26, p = 0.003; TNF-a:IL-10 and corneal staining: rho = 0.29, p < 0.001; TNF-a:IL-10 and Schirmer test: rho = -0.23, p = 0.009). CRs had no significant correlation with DED symptoms. All significant correlations using IL-6 in the denominator (anti-inflammatory) produced counterintuitive results based on clinical understanding of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Pro- to anti-inflammatory CR was weakly correlated with some DED signs and not with symptoms, as measured by OSDI. Future studies in different dry eye populations are needed and should address sampling biases and tear collection techniques.

Artificial Intelligence Improves Patient Follow-Up in a Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Program.

Purpose: We examine the rate of and reasons for follow-up in an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based workflow for diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening relative to two human-based workflows. Patients and Methods: A DR screening program initiated September 2019 between one institution and its affiliated primary care and endocrinology clinics screened 2243 adult patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes without a diagnosis of DR in the previous year in the San Francisco Bay Area. For patients who screened positive for more-than-mild-DR (MTMDR), rates of follow-up were calculated under a store-and-forward human-based DR workflow ("Human Workflow"), an AI-based workflow involving IDx-DR ("AI Workflow"), and a two-step hybrid workflow ("AI-Human Hybrid Workflow"). The AI Workflow provided results within 48 hours, whereas the other workflows took up to 7 days. Patients were surveyed by phone about follow-up decisions. Results: Under the AI Workflow, 279 patients screened positive for MTMDR. Of these, 69.2% followed up with an ophthalmologist within 90 days. Altogether 70.5% (N=48) of patients who followed up chose their location based on primary care referral. Among the subset of patients that were seen in person at the university eye institute under the Human Workflow and AI-Human Hybrid Workflow, 12.0% (N=14/117) and 11.7% (N=12/103) of patients with a referrable screening result followed up compared to 35.5% of patients under the AI Workflow (N=99/279; χ2df=2 = 36.70, p < 0.00000001). Conclusion: Ophthalmology follow-up after a positive DR screening result is approximately three-fold higher under the AI Workflow than either the Human Workflow or AI-Human Hybrid Workflow. Improved follow-up behavior may be due to the decreased time to screening result.

Outcome of silicone sling frontalis suspension in children with simple congenital and complex ptosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of silicone sling frontalis suspension (FS) surgery in children with simple congenital ptosis and children with complex ptosis. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: All pediatric patients who underwent silicone sling FS surgery between 2009 and 2020 at a single centre. METHODS: Patients were divided based on etiology into simple congenital ptosis and complex congenital ptosis. Pre- and postoperative margin-to-reflex distance (MRD1) measurements were determined from clinical photographs. Main outcome measures were assessed as differences in improvement in eyelid height and reoperation rate between the groups. RESULTS: Two-hundred and eight children were included: 139 simple and 69 complex cases, with 83 females (40%). Mean (±SD) age at intervention was 1.9 ± 2.9 years. Complex cases included blepharophimosis epicanthus inversus syndrome (n = 35), Marcus Gunn jaw-winking syndrome (n = 12), oculomotor palsy (n = 8), congenital fibrosis of extraocular muscles (n = 3), chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (n = 3), and others. Mean MRD1 improved by an average of 1.6 mm in both groups. Repeat ptosis correction was performed in 50 of 171 patients (29%) without a history of failed ptosis procedures, and this rate was similar between simple and complex cases. Children under 3 years of age had higher rates of repeat ptosis repair than older children (n = 59 of 175 [34%] vs n = 5 of 33 [15%]; p = 0.03, χ2 test). CONCLUSIONS: Silicone sling FS has a favourable outcome in 70% of pediatric patients. Preoperative and final MRD1 and reoperation rates were similar between both groups, suggesting that despite the higher complexity in atypical cases, the outcome is similar.

Introducing Surgical Equity into Contemporary Medical Education: Results From Operation Equity, a Pilot Curriculum.

OBJECTIVE: To date, education about health equity for early-stage healthcare trainees is largely situated outside of surgical disciplines. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a surgical equity curriculum offered to a voluntary group of medical and graduate students. DESIGN: Mixed-methods cohort study from January to June 2021. Pre- and post-course surveys measured domains of attitudes, self-reported confidence, and knowledge via 5-point Likert scale and multiple-choice questions. Paired t tests were used to analyze quantitative responses. Qualitative responses were studied via iterative thematic analysis. SETTING: At the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, PA which provides tertiary level, institutional care, 10, interdisciplinary 1.5-hour sessions were held over 1 semester, teaching surgical equity topics that spanned the peri-operative continuum. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four medical and graduate students from across the University of Pennsylvania enrolled. Twenty completed both surveys. RESULTS: From pre- to post-course, students improved across all domains. Students improved in their self-rated ability to identify strategies to talk about sensitive health topics with patients (pre: 20%, post: 90%) and identify strategies to address healthcare disparities in surgery (pre: 10%, post: 90%). Qualitatively, from pre- to post-course, more students could articulate the role of bias and identify opportunities for surgeons to engage in surgical equity. The course strengthened any pre-existing interest in surgical equity, and for 1 student, created interest in a surgical career where it had not previously existed. Many also expressed greater resolve to provide patient-centric care. CONCLUSIONS: Formal curricula can improve students' ability to advocate for surgical equity. A similar framework may fill a need for medical students interested in health equity and surgical careers at other institutions.