ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Postlaminectomy syndrome (PLS), also known as failed back surgery syndrome, is the persistence of radicular pain in the face of surgical intervention. Despite its prevalence in 10 to 40% of spine surgery patients, outpatient pharmacologic and interventional management remains poorly characterized. METHODS: The 2007 to 2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) was utilized to include all outpatients diagnosed with PLS. For each visit, documented pain medications (opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], neuropathic agents, etc) as well as patient demographics and comorbidities (sex, age, race, insurance coverage, and medical history) were recorded. The association between medication class and rate of prescription relative to sex was assessed in the population-weighted cohort, using propensity score matching to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 70,343 PLS patients were identified, including 36,313 (51.6%) women. After accounting for baseline demographics and comorbidity differences between male and female patients, men were 2 to 3 times more likely to be prescribed opioids (OR: 2.38; 95%CI: 2.30-2.46) and procedural interventions for PLS compared to the female cohort, while women utilized neuropathic agents (OR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.51-0.55) and NSAIDs (OR: 0.68; 95%CI: 0.65-0.70) more frequently. CONCLUSION: Pain management in outpatients presenting with PLS-related pain consisted of higher opioid utilization for men and higher neuropathic agents and NSAIDs utilization for the female patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This article is the first to shed light on disparities in pain management among patients with post-laminectomy syndrome.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess public response to cancellations of elective surgeries following the American College of Surgeons' (ACS) recommendation on March 13. METHODS: We queried text comments from Reddit, a social media platform and the fifth most popular website in the United States. Comments were manually reviewed to assess for relevance to elective surgery in the United States during the global coronavirus outbreak, whether the text was written by a healthcare worker (HCW), whether the user was based in the United States, and whether the text documented cancellations of surgery, expected cancellations of surgery, or surgery ongoing after the ACS announcement. Analysis of overall sentiment and negativity in comment text was performed using the Valence Aware Dictionary for sEntiment Reasoning (VADER), a validated natural language processing tool previously used in studies of health behaviors using social media. Non-parametric tests were used for subgroup comparisons based on posting date and characteristics identified during manual review. RESULTS: Following manual review, 1272 comments were included for analysis. Overall sentiment among non-HCWs became significantly more negative following the ACS announcement (P = 0.037). Overall sentiment did not significantly differ between HCWs and non-HCWs prior to the ACS announcement (P = 0.98), but non-HCW sentiment became significantly more negative than HCW sentiment after the announcement (P = 0.027). Negativity scores in posts describing cancellations were significantly higher among posts written by non-HCWs than HCWs (P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Cancellation of elective surgeries had an adverse emotional impact on non-HCWs. This finding highlights the importance of access to elective surgery to patients' emotional well-being.
