Disparities in SGLT2 Inhibitor or Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Initiation Among Medicare-Insured Adults With CKD in the United States.

Rationale & Objective: Information regarding disparities in initiating sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is limited. We examined sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with the initiation of SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, or second-generation sulfonylureas in a Medicare Fee-For-Service patient population with CKD and type 2 diabetes. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting & Participants: The 20% random sample of Medicare Fee-For-Service claims, 2012-2018. Exposures: Patients' sociodemographic and clinical factors. Outcomes: Use of SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, or sulfonylureas. Analytical Approach: Patients with a newly initiated prescription of SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, or second-generation sulfonylureas from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018, were identified. Multinomial logistic regression model was used to evaluate demographic and clinical factors associated with the initiation of SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, or second-generation sulfonylureas. Results: The study cohort comprised 53,029 adults (aged greater than or equal to 18 years) with CKD and type 2 diabetes, of whom 10.0%, 17.4%, and 72.6% had a first prescription for SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, and sulfonylurea, respectively. Patients aged greater than or equal to 75 years versus those aged 65-74 years had lower odds to start SGLT2i or GLP-1RA compared with sulfonylureas. Black patients were associated with lower odds of initiation of SGLT2i (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.61-0.74) and GLP-1RA (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.79), compared with White patients. Hispanic and Asian patients had lower odds of initiation of GLP-1RA. Patients with cardiovascular disease or hyperlipidemia had higher odds to start SGLT2i or GLP-1RA. Limitations: CKD and type 2 diabetes diagnosis; CKD stage; and patient clinical status were identified with diagnosis or procedure codes. There is potential for residual confounding with the use of retrospective data. Conclusions: The results of this study identified disparities in the use of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA in patients with CKD. Black and older patients were significantly less likely to be initiated on SGLT2i or GLP-1RA than on second-generation sulfonylureas.

Patient Support Program and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients Using Clean Intermittent Catheterization for Bladder Management.

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a patient-centered, chronic care self-management support program of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) on emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations within the first 30 days of starting CIC. Secondary research objectives were to compare reuse of catheters, adherence to healthcare provider-instructed frequency of CIC, and reasons for nonadherence. DESIGN: A correlational survey design with 2 respondent groups. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Four hundred forty-five respondents met inclusion criteria for this study; 321 respondents enrolled in an intermittent catheter manufacturer-supported CIC support program, and 124 respondents were not enrolled in a support program (comparison group). METHODS: Participants completed a 37-item online questionnaire designed for purposes of this study. Chi-square test was used to assess differences in the proportions of patients with ED visits and overnight hospital admissions comparing respondents enrolled in the patient support program to those not enrolled. Regression analyses were performed to estimate the effect of the CIC support program on ED visit events and on hospital overnight stays. RESULTS: Within the first month of CIC initiation, 16.1% and 10.2% of the respondents in the comparison group reported at least 1 ED visit and at least 1 overnight hospital stay, respectively. Respondents participating in the CIC support program experienced a 47% decrease in ED visits (adjusted rate ratio: 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.30-0.94, P = .036) and a 77% decrease (adjusted rate ratio: 0.24; 95% confidence interval: 0.10-0.62, P = .002) in hospital overnight stays within the first month of CIC initiation, while controlling for age, sex, education, duration of CIC use, region, health insurance status, and medical conditions necessitating CIC. Respondents in the CIC support program group reported an 8% higher adherence rate with the healthcare provider-instructed frequency of CIC usage compared to the comparison group (88% vs 80%, P = .039). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of CIC-related complications within the first month of CIC initiation is significant. A patient-centered, chronic care self-management program for CIC was associated with fewer ED visits and overnight hospital stays during the first month of CIC and improved adherence to prescribed frequency of CIC use.

Hypoglycemia Risk With SGLT2 Inhibitors or Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Versus Sulfonylureas Among Medicare Insured Adults With CKD in the United States.

Rationale & Objective: Information on safety issues of newer glucose-lowering medications from a large population perspective in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with type 2 diabetes is limited. Our study aimed to examine hypoglycemia risk associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) versus second-generation sulfonylureas in a general population of older patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes, across race, age, sex, and socioeconomic subgroups. Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting & Participants: The 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service claims, 2012-2018. Exposures: Use of SGLT2is, GLP-1RAs, or sulfonylureas. Outcomes: Hypoglycemic events resulting in health care utilization. Analytical Approach: Cox proportional hazard model evaluated the 90-day risk of hypoglycemia associated with SGLT2is or GLP-1RAs versus sulfonylureas. Results: A total of 18,567 adults (mean age: 73 years) with CKD and type 2 diabetes was included; 14.0% (n = 2,528) had a prescription for a SGLT2i or GLP-1RA, and 86.0% (n = 16,039) with a sulfonylurea. Compared with sulfonylureas, use of SGLT2is or GLP-1RAs was associated with a significantly lower risk of hypoglycemia (adjusted HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.14-0.65). Black individuals had higher risk of developing hypoglycemia than White individuals (adjusted HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.07-2.26). Low-income subsidy compared to no low-income subsidy status was associated with higher risk of hypoglycemic events. The risk of hypoglycemia also increased with higher comorbid condition score. Limitations: CKD and type 2 diabetes diagnosis, CKD stage, and patient clinical status were identified with diagnosis or procedure codes. There is potential for residual confounding with use of retrospective data. Conclusions: Use of SGLT2is or GLP-1RAs compared with sulfonylureas was associated with a lower risk of hypoglycemia among patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes. Black race was not only associated with lower use of newer agents with demonstrated cardiovascular and kidney benefits and lower hypoglycemia risk, but also with a higher rate of hypoglycemic events as compared with White individuals.

Glucose-Lowering Medication Use in CKD: Analysis of US Medicare Beneficiaries Between 2007 and 2016.

BACKGROUND: Information regarding the use of glucose-lowering medications in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is limited. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Medicare 5% random sample of patients with CKD with type 2 diabetes, 2007 to 2016. PREDICTORS: Study year, CKD stage, low-income subsidy status, and demographic characteristics (age, sex, and race/ethnicity). OUTCOMES: Trends in use of glucose-lowering medications. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Yearly cohorts of patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes were created. Descriptive statistics were used to report proportions of patients using glucose-lowering medications. To test overall trends in glucose-lowering medication classes, linear probability models with adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, CKD stage, and low-income subsidy status were used. RESULTS: Metformin use increased significantly from 32.7% in 2007 to 48.7% in 2016. Use of newer classes of glucose-lowering medications increased significantly, including dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (5.6%, 2007; 21.7%, 2016), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (2.3%, 2007; 6.1%, 2016), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (0.2%, 2013; 3.3%, 2016). Newer insulin analogue use increased from 37.2% in 2007 to 46.3% in 2013 and then remained steady. Use of sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, older insulins (human regular and neutral protamine Hagedorn), α-glucosidase inhibitors, amylin mimetics, and meglitinides decreased significantly. Insulin was the most highly used single medication class. Insulin use was higher among low-income subsidy than among non-low-income subsidy patients. Combination therapy was less common as CKD stage increased. LIMITATIONS: Patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes and the CKD stages were identified with diagnosis codes and could not be verified through medical record review. Our results may not be generalizable to younger patients with CKD with type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Use of metformin and newer glucose-lowering medication classes is increasing in patients with CKD with type 2 diabetes. We anticipate that percentages of patients with CKD using these newer agents will increase.