Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Surg ; 107(9): 1163-1170, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32323879

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in patients with resectable gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (G-NECs) or mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (G-MANECs). METHODS: The study included patients with G-NECs or G-MANECs who underwent surgery in one of 21 centres in China between 2004 and 2016. Propensity score matching analysis was used to reduce selection bias, and overall survival (OS) in different treatment groups was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In total, 804 patients with resectable G-NECs or G-MANECs were included, of whom 490 (60·9 per cent) received adjuvant chemotherapy. After propensity score matching, OS in the chemotherapy group was similar to that in the no-chemotherapy group. Among patients with G-NECs, survival in the fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy group and the non-5-FU-based chemotherapy group was similar to that in the no-chemotherapy group. Similarly, etoposide plus cisplatin or irinotecan plus cisplatin was not associated with better OS in patients with G-NECs. Among patients with G-MANECs, OS in the non-5-FU-based chemotherapy group was worse than that in the no-chemotherapy group. Patients with G-MANECs did not have better OS when platinum-based chemotherapy was used. CONCLUSION: There was no survival benefit in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy for G-NECs or G-MANECs.


ANTECEDENTES: El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar si la quimioterapia adyuvante mejoraba la supervivencia en pacientes con carcinomas gástricos resecables neuroendocrinos (gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas, G-NECs) y carcinomas adenoneuroendocrinos mixtos (mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas, G-MANECs). MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron pacientes con G-NECs y G-MANECs tratados quirúrgicamente en 21 centros en China entre 2004 y 2016. Se utilizó un análisis de emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión para reducir el sesgo de selección y el método de Kaplan-Meier para estimar la supervivencia global (overall survival, OS) de los pacientes en los diferentes grupos de tratamiento. RESULTADOS: En total, se incluyeron en el estudio 804 pacientes con G-NECs y G-MANECs resecables y 490 pacientes (60,9%) recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante. Después del emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión, la OS del grupo con quimioterapia fue similar a la del grupo sin quimioterapia. En los pacientes con G-NECs, la supervivencia en los grupos con quimioterapia basada en 5-FU (fluorouracilo) y de quimioterapia sin 5-FU fue similar a la del grupo sin quimioterapia. Asimismo, la combinación de etopósido y cisplatino o de irinotecán y cisplatino no se asoció con una mejor OS en pacientes con G-NECs. En pacientes con G-MANECs, la OS del grupo con quimioterapia sin 5-FU fue peor que la del grupo sin quimioterapia. Los pacientes con G-MANECs no presentaron una mejor OS cuando se administró quimioterapia basada en platinos. CONCLUSIÓN: La administración de quimioterapia adyuvante en pacientes con G-NECs y G-MANECs no mejoró la supervivencia.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/drug therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/mortality , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/mortality , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Etoposide/therapeutic use , Female , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Humans , Irinotecan/administration & dosage , Irinotecan/therapeutic use , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Propensity Score , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Survival Analysis
2.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 43(2): 485-492, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28041649

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To investigate the incidence of and factors associated with anastomotic leakage (AL) following gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 3632 patients who underwent a laparoscopic gastrectomy or open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. A logistic regression model was used to identify the determinant variables, and a nomogram for AL was developed. RESULTS: A total of 3632 patients were included in the study, 50 of whom (1.4%) developed AL. Postoperative deaths occurred in 6 (0.2%) patients with AL failure to rescue. Esophagojejunal AL (27/50) and Billroth I AL (20/50) were the most common types of AL. Gastrografin swallow was the main diagnostic method. The diagnosis was made a median of 9 days postoperatively. The median healing time for AL was 34.5 days. Of the 50 AL patients, 56% of patients could be managed nonsurgically, whereas 28% of patients required percutaneous radiologic drainage, 6% of patients were treated by endoscopy, and 10% of patients required a second surgery. A multivariate analysis showed the following adverse risk factors for AL: age ≥65 years, hemoglobin ≤8.0 g/dL and malnourishment. A multivariable model for AL showed a strong optimism-adjusted discrimination (concordance index, 0.675). The 5-year overall survival rates for patients without or with AL were 59.4% and 67.4%, respectively (p = 0.354). CONCLUSIONS: AL was infrequent but was more prevalent in patients with age ≥65 years, hemoglobin ≤8.0 g/dL and malnourishment. We created a novel nomogram that can provide individualized prediction of AL in patients after a gastrectomy for gastric cancer, which may help clinicians in making treatment decisions.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Gastrectomy , Nomograms , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
3.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 42(10): 1464-70, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27570115

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research on the clinicopathology and prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) is rare, and a uniform standard for treatment has not been established. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 132 cases of GNEC to investigate the factors influencing prognosis. METHODS: A total of 132 patients diagnosed with GNEC at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from January 2006 to December 2013 were enrolled. This study was performed to analyze the factors related to patient prognosis. RESULTS: In total, 58 men and 74 women whose ages ranged from 38 to 83 years old (62 ± 10) were enrolled. The 1- and 3-year survival rates for these patients were 83.9% and 47.6%, respectively. Of these patients, 100 underwent radical resection, 22 underwent palliative resection, and 10 received chemotherapy alone. The median survival times following radical resection, palliative resection and chemotherapy alone were 48, 20 and 12 months, respectively (P < 0.01). Univariate and multivariate survival analyses of patients who underwent radical resection showed that tumor size, N stage, Ki-67 labeling index, mitotic index and the application of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were independent factors affecting patient prognosis. The correlation analysis of the Ki-67 labeling index and mitotic index with prognosis showed that patient survival decreased significantly when the Ki-67 labeling index increased (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent radical resection had the best prognosis among GNEC. For these patients, tumor size, N stage, Ki-67 labeling index, mitotic index and the application of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were the clinicopathological factors significantly associated with patient prognosis.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/mortality , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/surgery , Female , Humans , Ki-67 Antigen/analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery
4.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 37(6): 481-7, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21371852

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term effect of negative lymph node (LN) counts on the prognosis after curative distal gastrectomy among gastric cancer patients. METHODS: The study enrolled 634 patients with gastric cancer, who had undergone curative resection (R0) with distal gastrectomy from 1995 to 2004. Long-term surgical outcomes and relationships between the negative LN count and the 5-year survival rate were investigated. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate of the entire cohort was 57.6%. The number of metastasis negative LN was positively associated with the retrieved node according to the Pearson's correlation test (P < 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed the negative LN count was an independent predictor of survival (P < 0.05). Based on the statistical assumption the best fitting linear, linear regression showed a significant survival improvement based on increasing negative LN count for patients with stages I (P = 0.014), II (P = 0.011) and III (P = 0.003). The greatest survival differences were observed at cutoff value 10 negative LN counts for stage I, and 15 for stages II, III and IV. CONCLUSION: Negative LN counts can reflect the extent of lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy. The higher the negative LN count, the better the survival would be; the best long-term survival outcome was observed on the negative LN count more than 10 (stage I) or 15 (stages II, III, and IV).


Subject(s)
Gastrectomy , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Actuarial Analysis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Chi-Square Distribution , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Linear Models , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome
5.
Acta Virol ; 55(1): 69-73, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21434707

ABSTRACT

The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) tegument protein VP22 encoded by the UL49 gene is essential for HSV-1 infection. However, its precise functions in the virus life cycle are unknown. A relatively important tool for disclosing these functions is an antiserum specifically detecting VP22 in the infected cell. To this end, a recombinant truncated VP22 protein consisting of C-terminal 45 aa fused to EYFP (enhanced yellow fluorescent protein) and His-tag was expressed in Escherichia coli, purified by the Ni2+-NTA affinity chromatography, and used for the preparation of antiserum in rabbits. Western blot and immunofluorescence assay showed that this antiserum specifically detected purified truncated VP22 as well as full-length VP22 in the HSV-1 infected cells. These results indicate that the prepared antiserum could serve as a valuable tool for further studies of VP22 functions.


Subject(s)
Herpesvirus 1, Human/immunology , Immune Sera/immunology , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/immunology , Viral Structural Proteins/immunology , Animals , Bacterial Proteins/chemistry , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Herpesvirus 1, Human/genetics , Luminescent Proteins/chemistry , Peptide Fragments/genetics , Peptide Fragments/immunology , Rabbits , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/isolation & purification , Viral Structural Proteins/genetics , Viral Structural Proteins/isolation & purification
6.
J Asian Nat Prod Res ; 9(2): 187-90, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17454317

ABSTRACT

A new cucurbitacin with an unusual ring A, isocucurbitacin D 25-O-acetate (1), was isolated from Bolbostemma paniculatum Franguent together with one known compound, cucurbitacin E (2). The structure of new compound was established by spectroscopic methods.


Subject(s)
Cucurbitaceae/chemistry , Triterpenes/isolation & purification , Cucurbitacins , Molecular Structure , Triterpenes/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL