Enabling conditions for an equitable and sustainable blue economy.

The future of the global ocean economy is currently envisioned as advancing towards a 'blue economy'-socially equitable, environmentally sustainable and economically viable ocean industries1,2. However, tensions exist within sustainable development approaches, arising from differing perspectives framed around natural capital or social equity. Here we show that there are stark differences in outlook on the capacity for establishing a blue economy, and on its potential outcomes, when social conditions and governance capacity-not just resource availability-are considered, and we highlight limits to establishing multiple overlapping industries. This is reflected by an analysis using a fuzzy logic model to integrate indicators from multiple disciplines and to evaluate their current capacity to contribute to establishing equitable, sustainable and viable ocean sectors consistent with a blue economy approach. We find that the key differences in the capacity of regions to achieve a blue economy are not due to available natural resources, but include factors such as national stability, corruption and infrastructure, which can be improved through targeted investments and cross-scale cooperation. Knowledge gaps can be addressed by integrating historical natural and social science information on the drivers and outcomes of resource use and management, thus identifying equitable pathways to establishing or transforming ocean sectors1,3,4. Our results suggest that policymakers must engage researchers and stakeholders to promote evidence-based, collaborative planning that ensures that sectors are chosen carefully, that local benefits are prioritized, and that the blue economy delivers on its social, environmental and economic goals.

[Clinical value of extravascular lung water and preload parameters in weaning of mechanical ventilation in patients with septic shock].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the values of extravascular lung water and preload parameters of weaning from mechanical ventilation on patients with septic shock. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted. A total of 52 septic shock patients with mechanical ventilation were enrolled from January 2010 to July 2012. All patients were treated and monitored by pulse induced continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) till they reached weaning criteria, and then spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), weaning, and extubation were performed in turn. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups including successful weaning group (n=38) and weaning failure group (n=14) according to clinical manifestations during 48 hours after weaning. Extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), preload parameters such as global end diastolic volume index (GEDVI) and intra-thoracic blood volume index (ITBVI), pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were compared at the time before weaning, 0.5 hour after weaning, 0.5 hour after extubation, and time of weaning failure or 48 hours after weaning. The patients in weaning failure group were sub-divided into high PVPI group (PVPI≥1.5 ml/m(2)) and low PVPI group (PVPI<1.5 ml/m(2)), the NT-proBNP and pulmonary blood volume (PBV) were compared between two groups. RESULTS: Before weaning, there was no statistical difference in NT-proBNP, volume parameters and EVLWI between two groups. EVLWI, GEDVI, ITBVI, PVPI and log NT-proBNP were gradually increased after weaning and extubation in two groups. The EVLWI, PVPI and log NT-proBNP were significantly higher at end point of observation in weaning failure group compared with those in successful weaning group (EVLWI: 12.81±2.13 ml/kg vs. 8.48±1.53 ml/kg, PVPI: 2.79±1.29 ml/m(2) vs. 2.19±0.94 ml/m(2), log NT-proBNP: 3.72±0.35 vs. 3.44±0.28, P<0.05 or P<0.01). GEDVI, ITBVI at 0.5 hour after weaning and end point of observation in weaning failure group were significantly higher than those in successful weaning group (0.5 hour after extubation: GEDVI 986.29±166.44 ml/m(2) vs. 856.47±149.15 ml/m(2), ITBVI: 1171.07±167.03 ml/m(2) vs. 1045.79±146.09 ml/m(2); end point of observation: GEDVI 957.00±67.25 ml/m(2) vs. 816.86±27.58 ml/m(2), ITBVI: 1184.29±209.68 ml/m(2) vs. 993.79±168.90 ml/m(2), P<0.05 or P<0.01). Sub-analysis showed that in weaning failure group, higher log NT-proBNP and PBV were found in patients with low PVPI compared with those with high PVPI (log NT-proBNP: 4.02±0.11 vs. 3.71±0.23, PBV: 507.19±25.72 ml vs. 347.85±47.52 ml, P<0.05 and P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Increased EVLW is the reason of pulmonary edema caused by weaning in septic shock patients, to which both hydrostatic and pulmonary permeability may contribute, and the latter could be more important. Monitoring preload parameters could help distinguish the mechanism of pulmonary edema after weaning, which may be useful in treatment.