[Preliminary experience of transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma].

Objective: To investigate the oncological and functional efficacy and safety of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma. Methods: Twenty-six patients with oropharyngeal cancer were enrolled who underwent TORS at Beijing United Hospital from June 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020. Among them, 22 patients were males and 4 were females, aged 39 to 76 years old. T1-2 patients accounted for 88.5% (23/26). Clinicopathological data including the time of removal of gastric and endotracheal tube were collected. The SPSS software package was used for survival analysis, and the overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate were calculated. Results: All the 26 patients with oropharyngeal cancer received TORS without conversion to open surgery, and 20 of them underwent simultaneous cervical lymph node dissection. TORS operation time ranged from 65 to 360 minutes with an average of 215 minutes. Intraoperative blood loss ranged from 5 to 600 ml with an average of 70 ml. Four patients (15.4%) underwent tracheotomy, of whom 3 patients had the removals of tracheal tubes within 1 month after surgery and 1 case remained to wear a tube by the end of follow-up. Twelve patients (46.2%) underwent gastric tube implantation, among them, 11 patients had removals of gastric tubes within 1 month after surgery and 1 patient died of oropharyngeal hemorrhage 13 days after operation. One patient (3.8%) had a positive surgical margin and others had pathologically negative surgical margins. Sixteen patients (61.5%) received postoperative radiotherapy, of whom 11 patients (42.3%) received platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy. The median follow-up time was 21.5 months (0.4 to 45 months). The overall survival and the disease-free survival rates were 83.0% and 75.8%, respectively. Conclusion: The application of TORS in treatment of oropharyngeal cancer can achieve good oncological and functional outcomes in selected patients.

[Clinical analysis of robot-assisted laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair].

Objective: To explore the clinical value of robot-assisted laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent robotic inguinal hernia repair from January 2018 to December 2019 at Beijing United Family hospital. The patients were all male with mean age 48.8 (17-72) years and BMI 25.8 (21.2-32.6)kg/m(2). Data examined included perioperative bleeding, operative times, length of stay, pain scale ratings and postoperative complication. Results: There were no major complications during the surgeries including no significant intraoperative bleeding, injury to the vas deferens or major vascular structures. There were no conversions to open. No patients received prophylactic antibiotics according to our hospital policy. No surgical site infections were found. All patients were discharged home within the 24-hour postoperative period. The mean operating time of 13 cases of unilateral hernia was 121 (82-165) min, and that of 10 cases of bilateral hernia was 166 (100-315) min. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 13.3 ml (5-25 ml). The average pain score in recovery was 0.96 (0-3). The total length of stay was 28.4 (24.2-37.5) h. During a follow-up period of 3-18 months, none of the patients experienced a recurrent hernia. None experienced chronic pain or discomfort in the operative field. Conclusions: The robotic surgical platform facilitates a new safe, minimally invasive approach to groin hernia. Because of improved ergonomics, visualization and wristed instrumentation, the robotic approach enabled creation of larger peritoneal flaps and had the potential for less injuries. The major advantage to the patient is a shorter hospital stay, and more rapid postoperative recovery and decreased postoperative pain, lower complications and recurrences.