[Characteristics and treatments of the Essex-Lopresti injury].

OBJECTIVE: To summarize experiences of operative treatment for Essex-Lopresti injury, and analyze the effect of the compare repair of interosseous membrane of forearm(IOM)on the forearm function. METHODS: Twenty-four patients of Essex-Lopresti injury were treated from January 2005 to December 2013, 16 patients(group A) with radius and/or ulna fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation of radius or ulna and repair of forearm bone membrane at the same time, and then treated with open reduction and internal fixation of head of radius, as well as lower ulnar joint fixation or repair of wrist triangle fiber complex. Another 8 patients without radius and or ulna fractures(group B) were treated with open reduction and internal fixation of head of radius, as well as lower ulnar joint fixation or repair of wrist triangle fiber complex. The wrist joint function was evaluated using Cooney wrist functional rating index, and the elbow joint function was evaluated using Mayo elbow-performance score 2 weeks and 2 years after operation. RESULTS: According to Cooney wrist functional rating index, 4 patients in group A got a fair result and 12 poor, 2 patients in group B got a fair result and 6 poor 2 weeks after operation; 8 patients in group A got a good result, 6 fair and 2 poor, 5 patients in group B got a good result, 2 fair and 1 poor 2 years after operation. According to Mayo elbow-performance score, 2 patients in group A got a good result, fair and 6 poor, 1 patient in group B got a good result, 5 fair and 2 poor 2 weeks after operation; 8 patients in group A got a good result, 6 fair and 2 poor, 4 patients in group B got a good result, 3 fair and 1 poor. There were no statistically differences between two groups 2 weeks and 2 years after operation. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to restore the length of radius and/or ulna and maintain the dynamic stabilization of elbow and wrist for treat Essex-Lopresti injury. The repair of IOM has no effect on the forearm function.

[Analysis of diagnosis and treatment of Segond fracture].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical characteristics of Segond fracture and its operative method and opportunity. METHODS: From June 2008 to December 2011, arthroscopic exploration was performed in 16 patients with Segond fracture. Six patients were explored at 1 week after injury ,their anterior cruciate ligament were broken completely combined with meniscus injury. Ten patients were explored at 8-10 weeks after injury, 4 patients with anterior and posterior cruciate ligament breakage completely, 4 patients with anterior cruciate ligament breakage completely,and 2 patients with anterior cruciate ligament breakage incompletely,among 10 cases, 8 cases of anterior cruciate ligament breakage completely combined with meniscus injury, 1 case of anterior cruciate ligament breakage incompletely without obviously meniscus injury, 1 case combined with fibular head fracture and lateral collateral ligament injury. All broken cruciate ligaments were rebuilt after arthroscopic exploration and meniscus injuries were sutured in 5 cases. Clinical effects were evaluated according to Lysholm-Gillquist scoring of knee joint function. RESULTS: Six patients were operated at 1 week after injury,their knee joint swelled obviously at 3 days after operation,unloaded blood oozing by joint puncture,and out-of-bed activity with assistance at the I week after operation. Other 10 patients were operated at 8-10 weeks after injury,no knee joint obviously swelled,no blood oozing was found by joint puncture ,and out-of-bed activity with assistance at 3 days after operation. All patients were followed up from 12 to 50 months with an average of 24 months. Postoperative Lysholm-Gillquist scoring of all patients were higher than preoperative and recovered well. CONCLUSION: Segond fractures often associated with anterior cruciate ligament breakage and meniscus injury,it is important that early detection for treatment. The best time of cruciate ligament rebuilding and meniscus repairing may be at 8-10 weeks after injury.

Rectovestibular fistula with normal anus: a simple resection or an extensive perineal dissection?

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to review a 10-year experience of operative procedures for rectovestibular fistula with normal anus (RVFNA) at one institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1999 to December 2008, 182 female patients of RVFNA were treated surgically in the Department of Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, China. The patients' age ranged from 4 months to 15 years, with a mean age of 3.4 years. Fourteen children had a failed previous operation in other institutions. One hundred fifty-six patients (85.71%) had a definite history of vulvar inflammation within 3 months after birth and fecal leakage thereafter. In 61 of the 156 patients, a perineal abscess appeared after an episode of diarrhea. Four cases (2.20%) had associated anomalies of the VACTERL type. One hundred seventy-three patients (95.05%) had 1 external opening, whereas 9 others (4.95%) had 2 external openings separated by a skin bridge. In all cases, the internal orifice opened above the dentate line. The fistula in 135 cases (74.18%) presented as an opening with a small diameter (<5 mm). In our series, vestibular-rectal pull-through procedure was performed in 98 cases, transanal procedure in 69 cases, and anterior perineal anorectoplasty in 15 cases. None had a diverting colostomy. RESULTS: Recurrence of fistula occurred in 5 to 10 days after operation in 21 cases (11.54%). Eight of them healed spontaneously after daily sitz bath with 3% boric acid, whereas other 13 patients (7.14%) required reoperation. Follow-up was obtained by telephone or by personal visit in the outpatient department, from 3 months to 10 years (median, 5.7 years). All the patients were continent and had regular bowel movement. CONCLUSIONS: Most RVFNA was acquired after infection. Procedure requiring extensive perineal dissection and diverting colostomy are unnecessary in most RVFNA cases. We performed simple resection in most patients with satisfactory results. In the cases with a large external opening and abnormal perineal appearance, a more extensive perineal dissection might be necessary.