ABSTRACT
Abusive supervision has long been found to have remarkably negative impacts on individual and organizational outcomes. Accordingly, prior studies have explored many organizational and supervisory predictors of abusive supervision and offered several interventions to reduce it. However, extant research lacks the bottom-up perspective to explore how employees can act to reduce abusive supervision, which is an important factor that enriches abusive supervision literature and helps employees protect themselves from being abused. Drawing on self-disclosure theory, we develop a model of whether and how employee boundary blurring behavior may protect them from being abused by their supervisors. Specifically, we conducted two studies to test the theoretical model, including a scenario-based experimental study and a multi-source, multi-wave field study. The results reveal a negative indirect effect of employee boundary blurring behavior on abusive supervision via supervisor liking toward the employee. By uncovering employee boundary blurring behavior as an antecedent of abusive supervision, we enrich the abusive supervision literature with a bottom-up behavioral strategy for employees to proactively protect themselves from being abused. We hope our findings will encourage future studies to identify boundary conditions and other solutions for employees to minimize the risk of being abused.
ABSTRACT
Early intervention for emerging adults with addiction and mental health disorders is beneficial for long-term recovery. The present study investigated the utility of routine outcome monitoring during acute inpatient hospitalization for identifying emerging adults at risk of poor outcomes. This is a retrospective study using latent class growth analysis (LCGA) to identify patient groups with different recovery trajectories, with additional analyses to clarify the characteristics of these trajectory groups. The results identified four patient groups: Rapid responders (38%), gradual responders (34%), high distress non-responders (9%), and low distress non-responders (19%). The high distress non-responding group is characterized by behaviours and disorders associated with ambivalent care seeking: Voluntary admission, longer length of stay, lower service satisfaction, higher outpatient service utilization, elevated risk of emergency department presentation and hospital readmission, and depression/personality disorder diagnosis. The low distress group is characterized by behaviours and disorders associated with treatment rejection: Involuntary admission, shorter length of stay, reduced post-discharge service utilization, and psychotic disorder diagnosis. The results have implications for identifying at-risk youth and developing stepped-care models for more effective and efficient inpatient care.
