Clinical and molecular genetic analysis of a Chinese family with hereditary elliptocytosis caused by a novel mutation in the EPB41 gene.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary elliptocytosis (HE) is a heterogeneous red blood cell membrane disorder characterized by the presence of elliptocytes on a peripheral blood smear. Clinical manifestations of HE vary widely from asymptomatic carriers to patients with severe transfusion-dependent anemia. Most patients are asymptomatic or have mild anemia, which hinders diagnosis. The proband in this case had mild anemia and jaundice over a period of 4 years, the etiology of which was unclear. Hence, he was admitted to our hospital for further diagnosis. METHODS: Peripheral blood smears and routine blood tests were performed and biochemical parameters of the proband, and his family members were determined. To confirm the diagnosis, gene mutations were screened in the proband using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and verified by Sanger sequencing in other family members. RESULTS: A novel mutation (c.1294delA, p.Ser432 fs) in exon 15 of the EPB41 gene was detected in the proband and his family members. This mutation results in a frameshift and a premature stop codon at position 455, encoding a truncated protein. The variant was likely pathogenic according to the criteria of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. SWISS-MODEL protein structure prediction indicated partial loss of the spectrin and actin binding and C-terminal domains. CONCLUSION: A heterozygous mutation 1294delA in exon 15 of the EPB41 gene was identified using NGS and Sanger sequencing in members of a Chinese family. This identification expands the spectrum of EPB41 mutations and contributes to the genetic diagnosis of families with HE.

What makes D-dimer assays suspicious-heterophilic antibodies?

BACKGROUND: Heterophilic antibodies are still an important source of interference in immunoassays, but reports of interference with D-dimers are rare. Are D-dimer level abnormalities, found in the clinic, caused by heterophilic antibodies as well, or are other mechanisms involved? We will elaborate on this issue through two different examples in this article. METHODS: Serum from two patients with significantly elevated levels of D-dimers were measured and compared by different methods, diluted, and dealt with heterophilic antibody blockers. At the same time, to retrieve the interference, we focused on the cause of D-dimer false positives and made a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: The D-dimer values were normal (0.49 and 0.15 µg/mL) detected with different testing method and decreased after addition of heterophilic antibody blocking reagent. According to literature data, there were 66.7% (4/6) references showed the interference were heterophilic antibody. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of heterophilic antibodies on the measurement of D-dimers remains a big challenge. Different measuring instruments and methods may have significant differences in the measurement of D-dimers. By using a combination of instrumental methods for measuring, incorporating heterophilic antibody blockers, and combining with clinical performance and imaging data, most of the interference can be eliminated.