Optimal duration of fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although several clinical trials have suggested that postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy can improve survival of patients with gastric cancer, the optimal treatment duration has not been studied. This retrospective analysis evaluated the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer treated with six cycles of fluorouracil-based treatment compared with a cohort treated with four or eight cycles. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 237 patients with stage IB-IIIC gastric cancer who received four, six, or eight cycles of fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks after radical gastrectomy. The endpoint was overall survival (OS). Factors associated with prognosis were also analyzed. RESULTS: The estimated 3-year OS rates for the four-, six-, and eight-cycle cohorts were 54.4%, 76.1%, and 68.9%, respectively; and the estimated 5-year OS rates were 41.2%, 74.0%, and 65.8%, respectively. Patients who received six cycles were more likely to have a better OS than those who received four cycles (P = 0.002). Eight cycles failed to show an additional survival benefit (P = 0.454). In the multivariate analysis, the number of chemotherapy cycles was associated with OS independent of clinical covariates (P<0.05). Subgroup analysis suggested that among patients in all age groups examined, male patients, and subgroups of fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin combined chemotherapy, stage III, poor differentiation, and gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with a statistically significant benefit of OS compared with four cycles (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy might lead to a favorable outcome for patients with gastric cancer, and two further cycles could not provide an additional clinical benefit.

[Phase II study of docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination of docetaxel plus epirubicin (TE) versus docetaxel plus cisplatin (TP) as first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients were randomized into two groups with a ratio of 2:1, either to receive TE or TP regimen. The patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus epirubicin 60 mg/m2 (TE group) or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (TP group) administrated intravenously. Both regimens were once repeated 3 weeks later. The efficacy, time to progression and safety were evaluated at the end of the second cycle. RESULTS: Complete response was achieved in 5% of TE group and 3.6% of TP. Overall (complete plus partial) response rates in TE and TP group were 48.3% and 60.7%, respectively (P = 0.2788). Disease control rates (CR + PR + SD) for TE and TP groups were 83.6% and 80%, respectively (P = 0.4899). The median time to progression (TTP) was 10 months for TE versus 8 months for TP groups (P = 0.7119). The major grade III or IV toxicities were neutropenia (66.7% in TE; 53.6% in TP, P = 0.2373); and alopecia (30.0% in TE; 10.7% in TP, P = 0.0508). CONCLUSION: Both TE and TP regimens as first-line chemotherapy were similarly effective, safe and tolerable in the treatment for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.