A review of metal contamination in seagrasses with an emphasis on metal kinetics and detoxification.

Seagrasses are important foundation species in coastal ecosystems, and they provide food and habitat that supports high biodiversity. However, seagrasses are increasingly subjected to anthropogenic disturbances such as metal pollution, which has been implicated as a significant factor driving seagrass losses. There have been several reviews synthesizing the metal concentrations in seagrasses and evaluating their utility as biomonitors for metal pollution in the coastal environment at the local scale. However, the interpretation of metal data in seagrass biomonitors requires a more mechanistic understanding of the processes governing metal bioaccumulation and detoxification. In this review, the progress and trends in metal studies in seagrasses between 1973 and 2022 were analyzed to identify frontier topics in this field. In addition, we tried to (1) analyze and assess the current status of metal contamination in seagrasses on a global scale by incorporating more metal data from tropical and Indo-Pacific seagrasses, (2) summarize the geochemical and biological factors governing metal uptake and loss in seagrasses, and (3) provide an up-to-date understanding of metals' effects on seagrasses and their physiological responses to metal challenges. This review improves our understanding of the highly variable metal concentrations observed in the field.

Reaching the Goal: Superior Navigators in Late Adulthood Provide a Novel Perspective into Successful Cognitive Aging.

Normal aging is typically associated with declines in navigation and spatial memory abilities. However, increased interindividual variability in performance across various navigation/spatial memory tasks is also evident with advancing age. In this review paper, we shed the spotlight on those older individuals who exhibit exceptional, sometimes even youth-like navigational/spatial memory abilities. Importantly, we (1) showcase observations from existing studies that demonstrate superior navigation/spatial memory performance in late adulthood, (2) explore possible cognitive correlates and neurophysiological mechanisms underlying these preserved spatial abilities, and (3) discuss the potential link between the superior navigators in late adulthood and SuperAgers (older adults with superior episodic memory). In the closing section, given the lack of studies that directly focus on this subpopulation, we highlight several important directions that future studies could look into to better understand the cognitive characteristics of older superior navigators and the factors enabling such successful cognitive aging.

Boundary shapes guide selection of reference points in goal localization.

In this study, we contrasted two hypotheses theorizing the role of the global shape of a boundary in object location memory: People might differentiate reference points based on the global shape extracted from the environment configuration and choose appropriate parts for encoding a specific location, or, alternatively, only the number of reference points provided by a shape might be important for accurate encoding. We designed a location memory task in an immersive virtual environment in order to examine these two hypotheses. Participants first learned four target locations with a circular wall and a landmark array. During testing, participants recalled the locations with either one entire cue or part of one cue removed. Location memory was impaired when the testing cues did not form a circle, but it was not impaired when the testing configuration retained the circular shape. In Experiment 2, the circle formed by a landmark array and the circular wall did not share the same center during learning. Memory performance decreased when either the wall or the landmark array was removed during testing. These results indicated that participants might segment the shape of the circular wall into parts (similar to segmenting a clock face into 12 hours) and encode target locations relative to the differentiated parts. When such segmentation could be recovered from the testing configuration, object location memory was retained. Otherwise, impairment occurred during testing. These findings suggest that although the individual reference points on a boundary are important for encoding specific target locations, the global shape of the boundary nonetheless affects segmentation and the selection of individual reference points.

The effects of cue placement on the relative dominance of boundaries and landmark arrays in goal localization.

Two types of visual features are identified as reference points used by individuals to encode locations: surface-based boundaries and discrete-object-based landmarks. Previous research show that learning locations relative to a boundary can overshadow learning relative to a landmark, but not vice versa, suggesting that environmental boundaries play a privileged role in representing individual locations. However, other research has revealed that a less accurate cognitive map is derived from boundary-related learning than from landmark-related learning, suggesting that a boundary is less privileged in representing inter-location spatial relations. The current study aims to reconcile these inconsistent findings. Experiment 1, using both a cue-competition paradigm and a cognitive mapping task, replicated the finding that participants preferred a circular boundary to a four-landmark array for encoding four locations (1A), but that the cognitive maps of the locations derived from the landmark array were more accurate (1B). Using the cue-competition paradigm, Experiments 2-4 manipulated the placement and distinctiveness of the two cues. The results showed that manipulating the placement of the landmark array effectively modulated the relative reliance upon the boundary/landmark-array in encoding individual location. Whereas increasing the distinctiveness of the landmark-array alone is not sufficient to eliminate the boundary advantage in localization. We propose that the boundary privilege occurs in selecting reference points for encoding locations due to its relative peripheral placement in the environment, whereas the landmark advantage occurs in inferring inter-location spatial relations due to the common reference point provided by the single landmark.

The limits of boundaries: unpacking localization and cognitive mapping relative to a boundary.

Previous research (Zhou, Mou, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 42(8):1316-1323, 2016) showed that learning individual locations relative to a single landmark, compared to learning relative to a boundary, led to more accurate inferences of inter-object spatial relations (cognitive mapping of multiple locations). Following our past findings, the current study investigated whether the larger number of reference points provided by a homogeneous circular boundary, as well as less accessible knowledge of direct spatial relations among the multiple reference points, would lead to less effective cognitive mapping relative to the boundary. Accordingly, we manipulated (a) the number of primary reference points (one segment drawn from a circular boundary, four such segments, vs. the complete boundary) available when participants were localizing four objects sequentially (Experiment 1) and (b) the extendedness of each of the four segments (Experiment 2). The results showed that cognitive mapping was the least accurate in the whole boundary condition. However, expanding each of the four segments did not affect the accuracy of cognitive mapping until the four were connected to form a continuous boundary. These findings indicate that when encoding locations relative to a homogeneous boundary, participants segmented the boundary into differentiated pieces and subsequently chose the most informative local part (i.e., the segment closest in distance to one location) as the primary reference point for a particular location. During this process, direct spatial relations among the reference points were likely not attended to. These findings suggest that people might encode and represent bounded space in a fragmented fashion when localizing within a homogeneous boundary.

Superior cognitive mapping through single landmark-related learning than through boundary-related learning.

Cognitive mapping is assumed to be through hippocampus-dependent place learning rather than striatum-dependent response learning. However, we proposed that either type of spatial learning, as long as it involves encoding metric relations between locations and reference points, could lead to a cognitive map. Furthermore, the fewer reference points to specify individual locations, the more accurate a cognitive map of these locations will be. We demonstrated that participants have more accurate representations of vectors between 2 locations and of configurations among 3 locations when locations are individually encoded in terms of a single landmark than when locations are encoded in terms of a boundary. Previous findings have shown that learning locations relative to a boundary involve stronger place learning and higher hippocampal activation whereas learning relative to a single landmark involves stronger response learning and higher striatal activation. Recognizing this, we have provided evidence challenging the cognitive map theory but favoring our proposal. (PsycINFO Database Record

Use of geometric properties of landmark arrays for reorientation relative to remote cities and local objects.

Five experiments investigated how human adults use landmark arrays in the immediate environment to reorient relative to the local environment and relative to remote cities. Participants learned targets' directions with the presence of a proximal 4 poles forming a rectangular shape and an array of more distal poles forming a rectangular shape. Then participants were disoriented and pointed to targets with the presence of the proximal poles or the distal poles. Participants' orientation was estimated by the mean of their pointing error across targets. The targets could be 7 objects in the immediate local environment in which the poles were located or 7 cities around Edmonton (Alberta, Canada) where the experiments occurred. The directions of the 7 cities could be learned from reading a map first and then from pointing to the cities when the poles were presented. The directions of the 7 cities could also be learned from viewing labels of cities moving back and forth in the specific direction in the immediate local environment in which the poles were located. The shape of the array of the distal poles varied in salience by changing the number of poles on each edge of the rectangle (2 vs. 34). The results showed that participants regained their orientation relative to local objects using the distal poles with 2 poles on each edge; participants could not reorient relative to cities using the distal pole array with 2 poles on each edge but could reorient relative to cities using the distal pole array with 34 poles on each edge. These results indicate that use of cues in reorientation depends not only on the cue salience but also on which environment people need to reorient to.

Reorientation in diamond-shaped environments: encoding of features and angles in enclosures versus arrays by adult humans and pigeons (Columbia livia).

Although geometric reorientation has been extensively studied in numerous species, most research has been conducted in enclosed environments and has focused on use of the geometric property of relative wall length. The current studies investigated how angular information is used by adult humans and pigeons to orient and find a goal in enclosures or arrays that did not provide relative wall length information. In enclosed conditions, the angles formed a diamond shape connected by walls, whereas in array conditions, free-standing angles defined the diamond shape. Adult humans and pigeons were trained to locate two geometrically equivalent corners, either the 60° or 120° angles. Blue feature panels were located in the goal corners so that participants could use either the features or the local angular information to orient. Subsequent tests in manipulated environments isolated the individual cues from training or placed them in conflict with one another. In both enclosed and array environments, humans and pigeons were able to orient when either the angles or the features from training were removed. On conflict tests, female, but not male, adult humans weighted features more heavily than angular geometry. For pigeons, angles were weighted more heavily than features for birds that were trained to go to acute corners, but no difference in weighting was seen for birds trained to go to obtuse corners. These conflict test results were not affected by environment type. A subsequent test with pigeons ruled out an interpretation based on exclusive use of a principal axis rather than angle. Overall, the results indicate that, for both adult humans and pigeons, angular amplitude is a salient orientation cue in both enclosures and arrays of free-standing angles.

Defining a boundary in goal localization: Infinite number of points or extended surfaces.

Four experiments examined the roles of extended surfaces and the number of points in the boundary superiority effect in goal localization. Participants learned the locations of 4 objects in the presence of a boundary, landmarks, or both in an immersive virtual environment by reproducing the locations with feedback. Participants then localized the objects in the presence of either the boundary or the landmarks during testing without feedback. The results showed that when both 1 landmark and a circular boundary were presented during learning, localization error during testing increased significantly when only the landmark was presented during testing, whereas localization error did not increase when only the boundary was presented during testing, thus demonstrating a boundary superiority effect. This boundary superiority effect was not observed when 36 landmarks forming a circle and a circular boundary were presented during learning. The landmark superiority effect was observed when 36 landmarks, forming a circular shape, and 1/36th part of the circular boundary were presented during learning. Furthermore, when a varied number of landmarks were presented with a circular boundary during learning, the localization error when the boundary was removed during testing was negatively correlated with the number of the landmarks. These results indicate that the superiority of a circular boundary to a landmark might be due to the larger number of points in the circular boundary but not due to the extended surface of the circular boundary.