A randomized double-blinded study assessing the dose-response of ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine for maintenance of labor with epidural analgesia in nulliparous parturients.

Background: The combination of ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine has been used as an epidural analgesic for inducing labor. However, there is limited data regarding the administration of epidural analgesia for labor maintenance, hence, this study aimed to determine the optimum concentration through dose-response curves of ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine, which could be used along with the Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus (PIEB) technique. Methods: One hundred parturients were randomized into 4 groups who were administered four different doses of ropivacaine (dexmedetomidine at 0.4 µg mL-1): 0.04%, 0.06%, 0.08%, and 0.1%. The primary outcome that was determined included the proportion of patients experiencing breakthrough pain during their 1st stage of labor. Breakthrough pain was described as a visual analog scale [VAS] score of >30 mm, requiring supplemental epidural analgesia after the administration of at least one patient-controlled bolus. The effective concentration of analgesia that was used for labor maintenance in 50% (EC50) and 90% (EC90) of patients were calculated with the help of probit regression. Secondary outcomes included epidural block characteristics, side effects, neonatal outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Results: The results indicated that the proportion of patients without breakthrough pain was 45% (10/22), 55% (12/22), 67% (16/24), and 87% (20/23) for 0.04%, 0.06%, 0.08%, and 0.10% doses of the analgesic that were administered, respectively. The EC50 value was 0.051% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.011%-0.065%) while the EC90 value was recorded to be 0.117% (95% CI, 0.094%-0.212%). Side effects were similar among groups. Conclusion: A ropivacaine dose of 0.117% can be used as epidural analgesia for maintaining the 1st stage of labor when it was combined with dexmedetomidine (0.4 µg mL-1) and the PIEB technique. Clinical Trial Register: https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx, identifier ChiCTR2200059557.

Differences in the global exposure, mortality and disability of low bone mineral density between men and women: the underestimated burden in men.

Talking about osteoporosis, we tend to focus on post-menopause women who are at increased risk due to estrogen depletion, while less attention has been paid to the disease in men. Currently, there is a lack of understanding about the difference of osteoporosis incidence and burden by sex. In this study, we used data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) to compare the difference in the prevalence and burden of low bone mineral density (LBMD) between men and women, by location, year, age and socio-demographic index. We found the prevalence of LBMD was higher in women than in men. However, the age standardized mortality rate was greatly higher in men than in women. Using disability-adjusted life year (DALY) to measure the burden, we also observed higher age standardized DALY rate in men. Using sociodemographic index (SDI) as the measure of social development level, we found that higher mortality and DALY rates were mainly seen in middle and high SDI countries. Falls were the leading cause for of deaths and disabilities in both men and women with LBMD, followed by transport injuries. Fall-related mortality was higher in women, while transport injuries caused more deaths and disabilities in men. Conclusively, more attention should be paid to osteoporosis in men, and related policies, clinical practices, and guidelines are in need to reduce the burden of LBMD and osteoporosis in men.

Epidemiology and burden of pelvic fractures: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic fracture is a severe injury resulting in high mortality and disability rate, and brought heavy health burden. However, existing research conclusions only restricted to the national level while global estimation of pelvic fracture was lack. We aimed to estimate the global incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability (YLDs) of pelvic fracture by region, age, gender, cause and sociodemographic index (SDI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Publicly available data was gained based on the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2019. We calculated the estimated annual percent change (EAPC) to analyze the temporal trends of pelvic fractures from 1990 to 2019. Incidence, prevalence and YLDs were analyzed by region, age, gender, cause and SDI. Spearman's rank order correlation was used to determine the correlation between SDI and incidence, prevalence and YLDs. RESULTS: Globally, there were about 6 million incident cases, 18.8 million prevalent cases and 3.2 million YLDs cases of pelvic fractures for both sexes in 2019. The incidence number increased over 40% compared to 1990. However, the age standardized rate of incidence (ASIR) (EAPC = -0.22; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.05), prevalence (ASPR) (EAPC = -0.42; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.32) and YLDs (ASYR) (EAPC = -0.41; 95% CI, -0.50 to -0.32) all presented downward trends. Males had higher ASIR, ASPR and ASYR than females in each year from 1990 to 2019. The incidence, prevalence and YLDs rates were higher in males in early adulthood but exceeded in females at older age. A positive correlation was observed between ASIR and SDI (rho = 0.3732, p < 0.01). Regions with higher SDI tended to have higher ASIR, ASPR and ASYR than lower SDI regions. Falls and road injuries were the major causes of pelvic fracture at all ages and during the whole period. CONCLUSION: The global health burden of pelvic fracture still remained high during the past thirty years. More policies and strategies are needed to face the challenge brought by population growth and aging.

Comparison of epidural dexmedetomidine to fentanyl in reducing ropivacaine dose in Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus plus Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia during labor: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study.

Background: Dexmedetomidine has been documented to reduce the dose of both intrathecal local anesthetic during cesarean delivery, and the concentration of ropivacaine needed for inducing analgesia during labor. However, few studies have compared adjuvant dexmedetomidine to fentanyl on how they impact the dose of ropivacaine required during labor. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of epidural dexmedetomidine at doses of 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 and 2 µg/ml of fentanyl (the traditional clinical concentration), when added to epidural 0.125% ropivacaine. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blinded study that comprised one hundred eighty-eight patients, allocated into four groups receiving either epidural fentanyl at 2 µg/ml, or dexmedetomidine at 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 µg/ml for labor analgesia. The primary outcome was the amount of ropivacaine necessary per hour. Secondary outcomes included visual analogue pain scale (VAS), motor block (Bromage Scale), side effects, patient satisfaction, and neonatal outcomes. Results: At the completion of the study, data from 165 participants were analyzed. The mean hourly amount of epidural ropivacaine administered was 16.2 ± 3.3, 14.0 ± 3.1, 13.1 ± 3.7 and 12.1 ± 2.5 ml/h in the 2 µg/ml fentanyl group, and the 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 µg/ml dexmedetomidine groups, respectively. There was a significant difference among groups in the mean hourly consumption of epidural ropivacaine (P < 0.0001 for 1 way ANOVA). The frequency of PCEA (patient-controlled epidural analgesia) was significantly higher in the fentanyl group than in the three dexmedetomidine groups (P < 0.001), and similar among the dexmedetomidine groups. The mean values of the VAS among all groups were similar over time, P > 0.05. The incidence of pruritus in the fentanyl group was 17.5%, whereas no patient experienced pruritus in any of the dexmedetomidine groups, P < 0.0001. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that epidural dexmedetomidine (0.3 and 0.4 µg/ml) was superior to standard dose epidural fentanyl in reducing the mean hourly amount of ropivacaine administered, and minimizing opioid-related side effects. Further large and multicenter studies would be necessary to confirm the benefits of dexmedetomidine, and potentially serve as an alternative to opioids for routine use in labor analgesia. Clinical trial registration: [http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=62846], identifier [ChiCTR2000039067].

Blocking the cytohesin-2/ARF1 axis by SecinH3 ameliorates osteoclast-induced bone loss via attenuating JNK-mediated IRE1 endoribonuclease activity.

cytohesin-2 is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor to activate ARF1 and ARF6, which are involved in various biological processes, including signal transduction, cell differentiation, cell structure organization, and survival. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence revealing the role of cytohesin-2 in osteoclast differentiation and in the development of osteoporosis. In this study, we find cytohesin-2 and ARF1 positively regulate osteoclast differentiation and function. Blocking the cytohesin-2 /ARF1 axis with SecinH3 or by genetic silencing of cytohesin-2 inhibits osteoclast formation and function in vitro. In vivo treatment with SecinH3 ameliorates ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis. Mechanistically, RNA-sequencing combined with molecular biological methodologies reveal that the regulatory function of cythohesin-2/ARF1 axis in osteoclast differentiation is mainly dependent on activating the JNK pathway. Further, in addition to the common viewpoint that JNK is activated by IRE1 via its kinase activity, we found that JNK can act upstream and regulate the endoribonuclease activity of IRE1 to promote XBP1 splicing. Both SecinH3 and silencing of cytohesin-2 inhibit JNK activation and IRE1 endoribonuclease activity, leading to the suppression of osteoclast differentiation. Taken together, our findings add new insights into the regulation between JNK and IRE1, and reveal that inhibiting the cytohesin-2/ARF1/JNK/IRE1 axis might represent a potential new strategy for the treatment of post-menopause osteoporosis.