Posterior scleral reinforcement using genipin-cross-linked sclera for macular hole retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate the surgical outcomes of posterior scleral reinforcement (PSR) using genipin-cross-linked sclera to treat macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) in highly myopic eyes. METHODS: Nineteen patients with high myopia (19 eyes) with MHRD were treated sequentially with genipin-cross-linked PSR and were followed at least for 1 year after the surgery. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), axial length (AL), optical coherence tomography (OCT) outcomes and the complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Macular hole was closed in 73.7% of the eyes, foveal reattachment rate was 100%. The mean logMAR BCVA improved from 1.27±0.55 preoperatively to 0.88±0.55 postoperatively. The preoperative AL (29.88±1.97 mm) was decreased (27.73±1.84 mm) after the operation (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For at least a 1-year period of follow-up, PSR with genipin-cross-linked sclera should be considered as a preferred surgical approach to treat MHRD in highly myopic eyes, especially when foveal retinoschisis is also documented.

Comparison between toric and spherical phakic intraocular lenses combined with astigmatic keratotomy for high myopic astigmatism.

BACKGROUND: To compare the outcomes of a toric phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) and a spherical PIOL combined with astigmatic keratotomy (AK) for the correction of high myopic astigmatism. METHODS: This study enrolled patients with high myopic astigmatism, including 30 eyes (22 patients) that received a toric PIOL implantation (TICL group), and 32 eyes (24 patients) that received combined AK and a spherical PIOL implantation (AK+ ICL group). The outcomes were compared between the two groups before surgery, and at the following time points after surgery: 1 week, 1, 3, 6 months, and 1, 2 years. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the mean manifest spherical equivalent (SE) was -14.14 ± 2.12 D in the TICL group and -14.83 ± 2.79 D in the AK + ICL group (P = 0.28), and the mean manifest refractive cylinder, -2.87 ± 1.09 D and -2.58 ± 0.85 D, respectively (P = 0.28). Two years postoperatively, the mean safety index was 1.53 ± 0.55 in the TICL group and 1.60 ± 0.70 in the AK + ICL group (P = 1.00), and the mean efficacy index, 1.18 ± 0.45 and 1.38 ± 0.52, respectively (P = 0.86). The mean manifest refractive cylinder correction was 1.94 ± 1.07 D in the TICL group and 1.39 ± 0.71 D in the AK + ICL group (P = 0.02). The mean changes in SE and refractive cylinder from 1 week to 2 years were less than 0.50 D in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both TICL implantation and AK + ICL implantation are a good alternative for correction of astigmatism in addition to high myopia. TICL implantation has better predictability in correction of high myopic astigmatism. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03202485.

Clinical Investigation of the Posterior scleral contraction to Treat Macular Traction Maculopathy in Highly Myopic Eyes.

Myopic traction maculopathy (MTM) can cause vision disabilities in highly myopic eyes. This retrospective case series investigated the clinical outcomes of posterior scleral contraction (PSC) using genipin-cross-linked sclera as the material to treat MTM in highly myopic eyes. In total, 32 eyes from 29 highly myopic patients who underwent PSC for MTM were recruited. The changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and axial length were evaluated, macular reattachment and macular hole (MH) closure was assessed by optical coherence tomography, and complications were evaluated. At the final follow-up, the retina was completely reattached in 25 eyes (78.1%), essentially reattached in 4 eyes (12.5%), and partially reattached in 3 eyes (9.4%). The logMAR BCVA improved significantly from 1.18 ± 0.45 preoperatively to 0.87 ± 0.45 postoperatively (P < 0.001). The 32 eyes were further divided into the MH group (16 eyes) and the non-MH group (16 eyes) for comparison. The MH was closed in 9 eyes (56.3%). The retinal reattachment rate was 75.0% in the MH group and 81.25% in the non-MH group, and the logMAR BCVA improved significantly in both groups. The PSC using genipin-cross-linked sclera as the material can effectively treat MTM in highly myopic eyes, and significant visual improvement can be achieved with minimal complications.

The efficacy and safety of posterior scleral reinforcement using genipin cross-linked sclera for macular detachment and retinoschisis in highly myopic eyes.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of posterior scleral reinforcement (PSR) using genipin cross-linked sclera as the material to treat macular detachment and retinoschisis, both without macular hole, in highly myopic eyes. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with highly myopic eyes (24 eyes) with macular detachment and retinoschisis were treated sequentially with genipin cross-linked PSR and were followed for at least 1 year after surgery. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent (SE) power, axial length (AL), optical coherence tomography, and the complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean SE decreased from -13.81±4.67 D preoperatively to -9.64±4.86 D postoperatively, while the improvement in the logMAR BCVA values was from 1.24±0.57 before surgery to 1.03±0.57 after surgery. The preoperative AL (29.73±2.31 mm) was decreased (28.08±2.08 mm) after the operation. The retina in 21 eyes (87.5%) was successful reattached and the macular detachment was significantly decreased in two eyes; a macular hole occurred in one eye. CONCLUSIONS: For at least a 1 year period of follow-up, PSR with genipin cross-linked sclera was safe and effective to treat macular detachment and retinoschisis in high myopia when a macular hole was not present. The reinforcement effect tended to be stabilised and maintained for 6 months after treatment.

Preliminary clinical investigation of cataract surgery with a noncontact femtosecond laser system.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) is rapidly gaining popularity due to the improved consistency and predictability for capsulorhexis. This study aimed to investigate the preliminary clinical outcomes of FLACS with a noncontact femtosecond laser system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 25 eyes in the trial group underwent FLACS (LLS-fs 3D, LENSAR, USA), and 29 eyes in the control group underwent conventional cataract surgery (Stellaris, Bausch & Lomb, USA). The phacoemulsification time, energy, and complications during operation were recorded. Postoperative refraction at 1 day, 1 week, 1 and 3 months, the capsulorhexis size and corneal endothelial density at 1 and 3 months were also measured. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, reduction in phacoemulsification time was 51.5% (P = 0.02), and in overall energy, 65.1% (P = 0.02) in the trial group. In the trial group and the control group, total time of cataract procedure was 10.04 ± 1.37 minutes, 10.52 ± 1.92 minutes, respectively (P = 0.31); the absolute difference between attempted and achieved capsulorhexis diameter at 1 month was 192.9 ± 212.0 µm, 626.9 ± 656.6 µm, respectively (P = 0.04), and at 3 months, 256.6 ± 181.9 µm, 572.1 ± 337.0 µm, respectively (P= 0.03); the absolute difference between attempted and achieved spherical equivalent at 3 months was 0.16 ± 0.16 D, 0.74 ± 0.65 D, respectively (P < 0.01); mean corneal endothelial cell loss at 1 month was 15.6% and 14.2%, respectively (P = 0.77), and at 3 months, 2.9%, 4.2%, respectively (P = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: With the noncontact femtosecond laser system, FLACS can significantly improve the accuracy and repeatability of capsulorhexis, reduce the phacoemulsification time and overall energy, and enhance the predictability and stability of postoperative refraction.

[Three-year follow-up of iris-claw phakic intraocular lens implantation for high myopia].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate long-term efficacy and safety of an iris-claw phakic intraocular lens (ICPIOL) implantation for high myopia. METHODS: A consecutive group of 86 eyes in 49 patients with -15.33±3.81 diopters (D) of myopia was implanted with the Artisan ICPIOL (Ophtec), and was evaluated preoperatively and 1, 2, 3 years postoperatively. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction, intraocular pressure, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The implantation was successful in all of 86 eyes. Compared with preoperative data, UCVA, BCVA, and spherical equivalent (SE) were improved significantly (F=513.68, 20.88, 827.65; P<0.01). At 3-year postoperatively, UCVA in 85% eyes was 0.5 or better, in 35% was 0.8 or better; No loss of BCVA was found, 17% gained 1 line, and 59% gained 2 lines or more; SE in 81%, 54% eyes was within ±1.00 D, ±0.50 D of attempted, respectively. At 1-, 2-, 3-year follow-up, the corneal endothelial loss was 3.60%, 5.78%, 7.74%, respectively. There were 2 macular haemorrhages resulted from CNV, and 1 ICPIOL repositioning due to inappropriate iris capture. No other severe complications occurred. CONCLUSION: At 3-year follow-up, the implantation of the ICPIOL proved to be safe and effective for the correction of myopia in phakic eyes.

Spherical aberration after implantation of an aspheric versus a spherical intraocular lens in high myopia.

PURPOSE: To compare visual performance and wavefront aberration in high myopia implanted with an aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) and a spherical IOL. METHODS: In this prospective investigation, 31 highly myopic patients were randomized to receive two IOL types: aspheric IOL (Acri.Smart 36A, 22 eyes) and spherical IOL (Rayner Superflex 620H, 23 eyes). Complete ophthalmological examination including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and corneal aberration (Humphrey corneal topography) were performed preoperatively, 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Ocular aberration (WASCA wavefront analyser) was performed 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Contrast sensitivity under different lighting condition (CSV-1000) was performed 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The aspheric IOL group and the spherical IOL group did not differ in baseline characteristics, including corneal spherical aberration Z(4) (0) (for 5-mm pupil diameter 0.13 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.15 +/- 0.08 microm, P = 0.317; for 6-mm pupil diameter 0.30 +/- 0.11 vs. 0.29 +/- 0.13 microm, P = 0.764). Compared with the spherical IOL group, the aspheric IOL group showed statistically significant less induction of Z(4) (0) of total ocular aberration at a pupil size of 5 and 6 mm 3 months postoperatively (0.07 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.12 +/- 0.06 microm, P = 0.017; 0.17 +/- 0.11 vs. 0.27 +/- 0.12 microm, P = 0.010), but not for 4-mm pupil (0.03 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.02 +/- 0.04 microm, P = 0.54). The BCVA and contrast sensitivity were not statistically different between the two groups postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The aspheric IOL induces significantly less spherical aberration than the spherical IOL after implantation in high myopia. Implantation of an aspheric IOL may reduce spherical aberration in high myopia, but clinically superior vision is not achieved.