Attachment expectations moderate links between social support and maternal adjustment from 6 to 18 months postpartum.

Significant links exist between one's perception of available social support and mental health outcomes, including during the transition to motherhood. Yet, attachment theory posits that individuals do not benefit equally from social support. As such, we examined the influence of attachment representations (i.e., secure base script knowledge) as they potentially moderate links between social support and psychological distress in a 1-year longitudinal study of an ethnically diverse (56% White) sample of infant-mother dyads. We hypothesized that higher social support would predict lower maternal psychological distress and this relation would be strongest in those with higher secure base script knowledge. Results indicated that maternal perceptions of social support were significantly negatively correlated with psychological distress. Analyses revealed that secure base script scores significantly moderated these associations. Interestingly, for those high in script knowledge, low social support predicted greater psychological distress. For those low in script knowledge, social support was unrelated to psychological distress. This pattern suggested that those who expect care (i.e., high secure base script knowledge) but receive minimal support (i.e., low perceived social support) find motherhood uniquely dysregulating. Practitioners may do well to examine individuals' attachment expectations in relation to their current social support.

Patient perception of community pharmacists prescribing pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to determine patients' perceptions of pharmacists prescribing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention. DESIGN: An anonymous, 26-item, cross-sectional survey was administered to individuals and data collection occurred during a 12-week period from January to March 2019. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Individuals were recruited to complete the survey in person at 5 locations of a large grocery-chain pharmacy in Washington, D.C. and Maryland. Inclusion criteria included individuals who were at least 18 years old and able to read and write English. Exclusion criteria included persons living with HIV or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. OUTCOME MEASURES: In order to measure perception, participants were asked on the survey to select their level of agreement using a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Researchers analyzed overall perception in addition to differences in perception based on various demographic characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 117 surveys were collected and analyzed. Most participants were comfortable with pharmacists prescribing PrEP. Notable statistically significant findings included participants who interacted with pharmacists through medication therapy review (4.4, 3.1 [P < 0.05]) and vaccinations (4.3, 3.1 [P < 0.05]) were more likely to agree with pharmacists prescribing PrEP than participants who had no previous interactions with pharmacists. Participants who had previously used PrEP were more likely to agree with pharmacists prescribing PrEP than those who had not used PrEP before. CONCLUSION: This study provided a glimpse into patients' perceptions of pharmacists prescribing PrEP. Patients were generally favorable of pharmacists prescribing PrEP; however, there are still barriers to overcome before prescribing PrEP for HIV prevention can feasibly occur in the community setting.