Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Neurosci ; 21(1): 46, 2020 11 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33218307

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As a noninvasive perfusion-weighted MRI technique, arterial spin-labeling (ASL) was becoming increasingly used to evaluate cerebral hemodynamics in many studies. The relation between ASL-MRI and crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) was rarely discussed. In this study, the aim of our study was to assess the performance of ASL-MRI in the detection of crossed cerebellar diaschisis after stroke in compared with single-photon emission CT (SPECT). RESULTS: 17 of 51(33.3%) patients revealed CCD phenomenon by the SPECT method. In CCD-positive group, CBFASL of ipsilateral cerebellar were significantly increased compared with contralateral cerebellar (p < 0.0001) while no significant differences (p = 0.063, > 0.001) in the CCD-negative group. Positive correlation was detected between admission National institute of health stroke scale (NIHSS) and asymmetry index of SPECT (AISPECT) (r = 0.351, p = 0.011), AIASL (r = 0.372, p = 0.007); infract volume and AISPECT (r = 0.443, p = 0.001), AIASL (r = 0.426, p = 0.002). Significant correlation was also found between cerebral blood flow of SPECT (CBFSPECT) and CBFASL, AISPECT and AIASL (r = 0.204, p = 0.04; r = 0.467, p = 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve value of AIASL was 0.829. CONCLUSIONS: CBF derived from ASL-MRI could be valuable for assessment of CCD in supratentorial stroke patients. Additionally, CCD was significantly associated with larger ischemic volume and higher initial NIHSS score.


Subject(s)
Cerebellar Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Cerebellar Diseases/etiology , Ischemic Stroke/complications , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Aged , Cerebrovascular Circulation , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spin Labels , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
2.
Cell Stress Chaperones ; 25(6): 1013-1024, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32705509

ABSTRACT

By observing the dynamic changes of extracellular histones H1, H2A, H4, and NF-κB expression in brain tissues after brain injury in rats, we explore the association among the expression of extracellular histones H1, H2A, H4, and NF-κB following traumatic brain injury (TBI), as well as the effect of different atmospheres absolute hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) intervention on the expression and possible mechanisms. A total of 120 SD rats were randomly divided into 4 groups: Sham-operated (SH), TBI (traumatic brain injury) group, traumatic brain injury and hyperbaric oxygen treatment 1.6ATA (TBI + HBO1) group, and traumatic brain injury and hyperbaric oxygen treatment2.2ATA (TBI + HBO2) group, with 30 rats in each group. The rats in each group were then randomly divided into five smaller time-specific sub-groups: 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery. TBI models were established, and the brain tissue around the lesion was taken at different time points. On the one hand,we detected the level of local histones H1, H2A, H4, and NF-κB by RT-PCR and Western Blot. On the other hand, we used immunohistochemical methods to detect the expression of NF-κB, while using the TUNEL method to observe the cell apoptosis in experimental groups after brain injury. Extracellular histones H1, H2A, H4, and NF-κB proteins were highly expressed at 3 h, then with a slight fluctuation, reached to peak at 48 h after the injury. HBO can affect the expression of histones H1, H2A, H4, and NF-κB. The decline of each indicator in the 1.6ATA group was significantly lower than that in the 2.2ATA group, especially within 6 h (P < 0. 05). In addition, NF-κB expression was consistent with the pathological changes of apoptosis in experimental groups. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy with relatively low pressure (1.6ATA) at the early stage can significantly inhibit the expression of extracellular histones H1, H2A, H4, and NF-κB around the lesion, reduce the apoptosis of nerve cells, and thus play an important role in alleviating secondary brain injury.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/metabolism , Extracellular Space/metabolism , Histones/metabolism , Hyperbaric Oxygenation , Animals , Apoptosis/genetics , Atmosphere , Brain/metabolism , Brain/pathology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/genetics , Cytokines/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Gene Expression Regulation , Histones/genetics , Male , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Transcription Factor RelA/metabolism
3.
Biomed Res Int ; 2018: 9434637, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30599001

ABSTRACT

The survival of individuals with tumors may be predicted by the peripheral blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) upon diagnosis in recent studies. For patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in the era of novel agents, the prognostic significance of LMR remains unclear. In this study, the prognostic impact of LMR is evaluated by 285 patients with MM who are treated with proteasome inhibitor and/or immunomodulatory drug. LMR is a proven predictor of survival using the receiver operating characteristic curve, with 4.2 as the cutoff point. Patients with LMR ≤ 4.2 at diagnosis had poorer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than those with LMR > 4.2. In addition, multivariate analysis showed that LMR less than 4.2 is an independent predictor for the OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.703; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.020-2.842; P = 0.042) and PFS (HR: 1.831; 95% CI: 1.098-3.053; P = 0.021). According to the test, the LMR at diagnosis, which functions as a simple index reflecting host systemic immunity, can predict clinical outcomes in patients with MM who are treated with new agents.


Subject(s)
Leukocytes, Mononuclear/pathology , Lymphocytes/pathology , Monocytes/pathology , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Aged , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Lymphocyte Count/methods , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models
4.
PLoS One ; 10(4): e0123431, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25875306

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To study the value of assessing renal masses using different methods in parameter approaches and to determine whether BOLD MRI is helpful in differentiating RCC from benign renal masses, differentiating clear-cell RCC from renal masses other than clear-cell RCC and determining the tumour grade. METHODS: Ninety-five patients with 139 renal masses (93 malignant and 46 benign) who underwent abdominal BOLD MRI were enrolled. R2* values were derived from the largest cross-section (R2*largest) and from the whole tumour (R2*whole). Intra-observer and inter-observer agreements were analysed based on two measurements by the same observer and the first measurement from each observer, respectively, and these agreements are reported with intra-class correlation coefficients and 95% confidence intervals. The diagnostic value of the R2* value in the evaluation was assessed with receiver-operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The intra-observer agreement was very good for R2*largest and R2*whole (all > 0.8). The inter-observer agreement of R2*whole (0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.69~0.79) was good and was significantly improved compared with the R2*largest (0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.52~0.68), as there was no overlap in the 95% confidence interval of the intra-class correlation coefficients. The diagnostic value in differentiating renal cell carcinoma from benign lesions with R2*whole (AUC=0.79/0.78[observer1/observer2]) and R2*largest (AUC=0.75[observer1]) was good and significantly higher (p=0.01 for R2*largest[observer2] vs R2*whole[observer2], p<0.01 for R2*whole[observer1] vs R2*largest[observer2]) than R2*largest for observer 2 (AUC=0.64). For the grading of clear-cell RCC, both R2*whole and R2*largest were good (all > 0.7) and were not significantly different (p=0.89/0.93 for R2*largest vs R2*whole[observer1/observer2], 0.96 for R2*whole[observer1] vs R2*largest[observer2] and 0.96 for R2*whole [observer2] vs R2*largest[observer1]). CONCLUSIONS: BOLD MRI could provide a feasible parameter for differentiating renal cell carcinoma from benign renal masses and for predicting clear-cell renal cell carcinoma grading. Compared with the largest cross-section, assessing the whole tumour provides better inter-observer agreement in parameter measurement for differentiating renal cell carcinoma from benign renal masses.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnosis , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/blood , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hemoglobins/metabolism , Humans , Kidney/metabolism , Kidney/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/blood , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasms/blood , Neoplasms/pathology , Observer Variation , Oxygen/metabolism , ROC Curve
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...