Stereotactic body radiotherapy for recurrent and oligometastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a malignant tumor of highly heterogeneous mesenchymal origin. STS has a biological pattern and clinical transformation with localized invasive growth and is susceptible to hematogenous metastasis. Local therapeutic strategies may treat recurrent and oligometastatic STS, including surgery and radiation therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for recurrent and oligometastatic STS. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 37 recurrent and oligometastatic STS patients with 58 lesions treated with SBRT from 2009 to 2019 at our institution. Oligometastatic is defined as metastatic lesions less than or equal to 3. The primary endpoint was local control (LC); secondary endpoints were survival and toxicity. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 21.0 months (3.0 to 125.0 months). Among 37 patients, 18 were recurrent patients, and 19 were oligometastatic patients. Median LC was 25.0 months (95% CI 20.0-45.0). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year LC rates were 80.2%, 58.3%, and 46.6%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 24.0 months (95% CI 13.0-28.0), and the survival rates after SBRT were 71.5%, 40.0%, and 29.1% at 1, 2, and 3-year, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.0 months (95% CI 8.0-15.0 months), PFS rate after SBRT was 43.6%, 26.8%, and 18.4% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Late grade 3 radiation dermatitis was observed in one patient (2.7%). Using univariate and multivariate COX analysis, better OS, PFS, and LC were obtained in the histologic grade 1(G1) group, and tumor size and a number of lesions influenced LC. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for patients with recurrent and oligometastatic STS. Histological grade influences local control and survival. SBRT may be a promising treatment option for recurrent and oligometastatic STS.

Neoadjuvant Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Blockade Combined With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Stage III(N2) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Series.

The addition of radiotherapy in neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not improve event-free or overall survival in resectable non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Neoadjuvant immunotherapy produced major pathologic response(MPR) rate of up to 45%. The potential synergy between radiotherapy and immunotherapy has been described in several studies. We reported outcomes of three cases of stage III/N2 NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in a single center. This explanatory trial included treatment-naive patients with stage III resectable NSCLC who received two doses of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor toripalimab after 1 week of receiving SBRT for lung lesions. Thereafter, surgery was planned 4-6 weeks after the second dose. The primary endpoints were safety and feasibility, while the secondary endpoint was the pathologic response rate. Toripalimab combined with SBRT as a neoadjuvant treatment had well-tolerable side effects and did not lead to a delay in surgery. Among the included patients, one achieved pathologic complete response (PCR), one achieved MPR, and one with 20% residual tumor did not achieve MPR. There were few side effects of toripalimab combined with SBRT as a neoadjuvant treatment, and the treatment did not cause a delay in surgery. This study preliminarily explored the outcomes of a new neoadjuvant treatment.

Study on Motion Management of Pancreatic Cancer Treated by CyberKnife.

PURPOSE: We investigated the movement characteristics of pancreas and the clinical accuracy of tracking pancreas with the Synchrony Respiratory Tracking System (SRTS) during the CyberKnife treatment. These data provide a clinical data basis for the expansion margins of pancreatic tumor target. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-two patients with pancreatic cancer treated by CyberKnife were retrospectively studied. The pancreatic displacement calculated from the x-ray images collected during the time interval between two consecutive movements constituted a data set. RESULTS: The total mean motion amplitudes and standard deviations of pancreatic tumors in SI, LR, AP, and radial directions were 3.66 ± 1.71 mm, 0.97 ± 0.62 mm, 1.52 ± 1.02 mm, and 1.36 ± 0.49 mm, respectively. The overall mean correlation errors and standard deviations were 0.82 ± 0.46 mm, 0.47 ± 0.33 mm, 0.41 ± 0.24 mm, and 0.98 ± 0.37 mm, respectively. The overall mean prediction errors and standard deviations were 0.57 ± 0.14 mm, 0.62 ± 0.28 mm, 0.39 ± 0.17 mm, and 1.58 ± 0.36 mm, respectively. The correlation errors and prediction errors of pancreatic tumors at different anatomical positions in SI, LR, and AP directions were statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The tumor motion amplitude, the tumor location, and the treatment time are the main factors affecting the tracking accuracy. The pancreatic tumors at different anatomical locations should be treated differently to ensure sufficient dose coverage of the pancreatic target area.

Re-irradiation of multiple brain metastases using CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy: Case report.

INTRODUCTION: Brain metastasis (BM) is the commonest adult intracranial malignancy and many patients with brain metastases require two course radiotherapy. Re-irradiation is frequently performed in Radiotherapy (RT) departments for multiple brain metastases. PATIENT CONCERNS: We present a case of a 55-year-old male patient suffering from brain metastases, who had previously received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and first CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiotherapy (CKSRT) for metastases, presented with a recurrence of metastasis and new lesions in the brain. DIAGNOSES: An enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the brain revealed abnormalities with double-dosing of intravenous contrast that identified >10 lesions scattered in the whole brain. INTERVENTIONS: Re-irradiation was performed using CKSRT. The patient was treated with 30 Gy in 5 fractions for new lesions and 25 Gy in 5 fractions for lesion that were locally recurrent and close to brainstem lesions. OUTCOME: The lesions were well-controlled, and the headache of the patient was significantly relieved one month after radiotherapy. The total survival time of the patients was 17 months from the beginning of the Cyberknife treatment. CONCLUSION: The present case report demonstrates that CyberKnife therapy plays a significant role in the repeated radiotherapy for multiple metastatic brain tumors. CKSRT can be used as a salvage method in recurrent multiple brain metastases.

A deep learning based automatic segmentation approach for anatomical structures in intensity modulation radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the automatic segmentation approach for organ at risk (OARs) and compare the parameters of dose volume histogram (DVH) in radiotherapy. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-three patients were selected to contour OARs using automatic segmentation approach which based on U-Net, applying them to a number of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), breast, and rectal cancer respectively. The automatic contours were transferred to the Pinnacle System to evaluate contour accuracy and compare the DVH parameters. RESULTS: The time for manual contour was 56.5 ± 9, 23.12 ± 4.23 and 45.23 ± 2.39min for the OARs of NPC, breast and rectal cancer, and for automatic contour was 1.5 ± 0.23, 1.45 ± 0.78 and 1.8 ± 0.56 min. Automatic contours of Eye with the best Dice-similarity coefficients (DSC) of 0.907 ± 0.02 while with the poorest DSC of 0.459 ± 0.112 of Spinal Cord for NPC; And Lung with the best DSC of 0.944 ± 0.03 while with the poorest DSC of 0.709 ± 0.1 of Spinal Cord for breast; And Bladder with the best DSC of 0.91 ± 0.04 while with the poorest DSC of 0.43 ± 0.1 of Femoral heads for rectal cancer. The contours of Spinal Cord in H & N had poor results due to the division of the medulla oblongata. The contours of Femoral head, which different from what we expect, also due to manual contour result in poor DSC. CONCLUSION: The automatic contour approach based deep learning method with sufficient accuracy for research purposes. However, the value of DSC does not fully reflect the accuracy of dose distribution, but can cause dose changes due to the changes in the OARs volume and DSC from the data. Considering the significantly time-saving and good performance in partial OARs, the automatic contouring also plays a supervisory role.

Metformin inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma development by inducing apoptosis and pyroptosis through regulating FOXO3.

This study aimed to expand our understanding of metformin (Met) in inhibiting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression and to investigate its underlying mechanism. Met was administrated to HCC cells at 5, 10, and 20 µM, after which the cell phenotype was evaluated. RNA-seq cluster analysis was used to screen for target genes modulated by Met. Luciferase activity and ChIP assays were performed to detect the effect of FOXO3 on the transcriptional activation of NLRP3. We evaluated the effect of Met and FOXO3 and on the growth of HCC cells in vivo. Met inhibited HCC cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis. Met also induced pyroptosis of HCC cells. FOXO3 was significantly upregulated by Met treatment, and FOXO3 activated transcription of NLRP3. Cells after Met treatment together with FOXO3 knockdown have a stronger colony formation and migration ability but a lower apoptosis rate compared to the Met treatment alone group. In vivo, Met inhibited HCC tumor growth. The tumors in Met treatment and FOXO3 knockdown group grew faster than in Met treatment group. Thus, Met attenuates HCC cell development by inducing apoptosis and pyroptosis. This effect of metformin is partially dependent on FOXO3 which can activate the transcription of NLRP3.

Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization Combined With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for BCLC Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not amenable to resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: From February 2012 to January 2017, a total of 57 BCLC stage B HCC patients who were unsuitable candidates for resection and RFA treated with TACE combined with CyberKnife SBRT were included in this retrospective study. Patients underwent TACE for a median of two times (1-5 times) before SBRT. SBRT prescription doses ranged from 30 Gy to 50 Gy in 3-5 fractions. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 42 months. The objective response rate (CR + PR) was 85.9%, and the disease control rate (CR + PR + SD) was 96.5%. The local control (LC) rates were 91.1% and 84.3% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-year overall survival (OS) and the median survival time were 73.2%, 51.4%, 32.4% and 26.6 months, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) were 34.2%, 21.6%, and 9%, respectively, with a median PFS time of 9.7 months. A subgroup analysis was conducted in 32 patients with AFP ≥ 200 ng/ml before TACE. OS was significantly prolonged in those with AFP that decreased by more than 75% than those with AFP that decreased by less than 75% (P = 0.018) after SBRT. The treatment was well tolerated with only one patient (1.8%) developed grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity, and another patient developed non-classical RILD. In multivariate analysis, tumor length ≥ 10 cm and AFP ≥ 200 ng/ml were independent poor prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSION: The combination of TACE and Cyberknife SBRT showed optimal efficacy with acceptable toxicity for BCLC stage B HCC.

Development and Validation of Multicenter Predictive Nomograms for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer After Chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Due to common practice of hypofractionated radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer and heterogeneous chemotherapy regimens in previous studies, modified nomograms are required. Therefore, we aim to develop and validate prognostic nomograms for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and chemotherapy. METHODS: The development cohort comprised 925 patients with LAPC receiving SBRT and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in our center, while 297 patients from another two centers formed the validation cohort. Nomograms were created from COX models and internally validated by bootstrap. Model discriminations were evaluated by calibration plots and concordance index (C-index). A decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate clinical benefits of nomograms. Additionally, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used for stratifications of survival probability based on the total score of each patient calculated by nomograms. RESULTS: Weight loss, tumor diameter, radiation dose, CA19-9 kinetics after treatment and surgical resection were included in the nomogram for overall survival (OS), while the five factors plus performance status formed the nomogram for progression free survival (PFS). The corrected C-indexes for estimated 1-year and 2-year OS of the development cohort were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.90). For those of the validation cohort, it was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.94) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.74-0.91). Additionally, the corrected C-index for predicted 1-year PFS in the development and validation cohort was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81-0.86) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87), respectively. The calibration plots showed good agreement of 1- and 2-year OS and 1-year PFS between the estimations and actual observations. Potential clinical benefits were demonstrated with DCA. Additionally, for 1- and 2-year OS and 1-year PFS, patients were stratified into four groups with different survival probability by RPA. CONCLUSION: The validated nomograms provided useful predictions of OS and PFS for LAPC with chemoradiotherapy.

Combined inhibition of AURKA and HSF1 suppresses proliferation and promotes apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma by activating endoplasmic reticulum stress.

PURPOSE: In this study we aimed to assess the anti-tumor effect of co-inhibition of Aurora kinase A (AURKA) and heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1) on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as well as to explore the mechanism involved. METHODS: Expression of AURKA and HSF1 in primary HCC tissues and cell lines was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC), qRT-PCR and Western blotting. AURKA was knocked down in HepG2 and BEL-7402 HCC cells using lentivirus-mediated RNA interference. Next, CCK-8, clone formation, transwell and flow cytometry assays were used to assess their viability, migration, invasion and apoptosis, respectively. The expression of proteins related to cell cycle progression, apoptosis and endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) was analyzed using Western blotting. In addition, in vivo tumor growth of HCC cells was assessed using a nude mouse xenograft model, and the resulting tumors were evaluated using HE staining and IHC. RESULTS: Both AURKA and HSF1 were highly expressed in HCC tissues and cells, while being negatively related to HCC prognosis. Knockdown of AURKA significantly inhibited the colony forming and migrating capacities of HCC cells. In addition, we found that treatment with an AURKA inhibitor (Danusertib) led to marked reductions in the proliferation and migration capacities of the HCC cells, and promoted their apoptosis. Notably, combined inhibition of AURKA and HSF1 induced HCC cell apoptosis, while increasing the expression of ERS-associated proteins, including p-eIF2α, ATF4 and CHOP. Finally, we found that co-inhibition of AURKA and HSF1 elicited an excellent in vivo antitumor effect in a HCC mouse model with a relatively low cytotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Combined inhibition of AURKA and HSF1 shows an excellent anti-tumor effect on HCC cells in vitro and in vivo, which may be mediated by ERS. These findings suggest that both AURKA and HSF1 may serve as targets for HCC treatment.

Clinical Effects of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Targeting the Primary Tumor of Liver-Only Oligometastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) targeting the primary tumor for liver-only oligometastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We compared the efficacy and safety of SBRT plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone in patients with liver-only oligometastatic pancreatic cancer. The populations were balanced by propensity score-weighted and propensity score-matched analyses based on baseline variables. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes included progression free survival (PFS), local progression, metastatic progression and symptomatic local control. RESULTS: This is a retrospective study of 89 pancreatic cancer patients with liver-only oligometastasis. Overall, 34 (38.2%) and 55 (61.8%) patients received SBRT plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, respectively. After propensity score matching, 1-year OS rate was 34.0% (95%CI, 17.8-65.1%) in the SBRT plus chemotherapy group and 16.5% (95%CI, 5.9-46.1%) in chemotherapy alone group (P=0.115). The 6-month PFS rate was 29.4% (95%CI, 15.4-56.1) in SBRT plus chemotherapy and 20.6% (95%CI, 8.8-48.6) in chemotherapy alone group (P=0.468), respectively. Further subgroup analysis indicated that the addition of SBRT improved OS in patients with primary tumor located in the head of pancreas (stratified HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.90) or good performance status (stratified HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.86). In terms of disease control, SBRT delayed local progression of pancreas (P=0.008), but not distant metastatic progression (P=0.56). Besides, SBRT offered significant abdominal/back pain relief (P=0.016) with acceptable toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of SBRT to chemotherapy in patients with liver-only oligometastatic pancreatic cancer improves the OS of those with primary tumor located in the head of pancreas or good performance status. In addition, it is a safe and effective method for local progression control and local symptomatic palliation in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Role of thoracic radiotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of thoracic consolidation radiotherapy in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in these patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library to identify qualified clinical studies. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were extracted, and toxicity of the TRT group versus non-TRT group was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 936 patients in the TRT group and 1,059 patients in the non-TRT group. The combined results showed that TRT significantly improved OS (HR =0.65; 95% CI: 0.55-0.77, P<0.00001), PFS (HR =0.64; 95% CI: 0.56-0.72, P<0.00001) and LRFS (HR =0.38, 95% CI: 0.26-0.53, P<0.00001). Subgroup analysis showed that OS benefits were observed in patients receiving sequential TRT (HR =0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.84, P=0.0006). The addition of TRT significantly improved OS in patients over 65 years of age (HR =0.55; 95% CI: 0.40-0.74, P=0.0001). For patients with only one organ metastasis, there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups (HR =0.61; 95% CI: 0.36-1.01, P=0.06). There was no statistical difference in hematologic toxicity (leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia) and non-hematologic toxicity (nausea or vomiting) between the two groups. The incidence of grade ≥3 esophageal toxicity was 4.6% in the TRT group and 0% in the non-TRT group (P=0.0001). Grade ≥3 bronchopulmonary toxicity was 2.9% in the TRT group and 0.8% in the non-TRT group (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: TRT improves OS, PFS and LRFS in patients with ES-SCLC, with a low increase in esophageal and bronchopulmonary toxicity. More randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are expected to confirm our conclusions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020190575.

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Salvage Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Post-Surgical Thoracic Oligo-Recurrence/Metastasis of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using CyberKnife (CK) in patients with postoperative thoracic oligo-recurrence/metastasis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NLCLC), and to analyze the prognostic factors affecting overall survival after SBRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 44 patients with postoperative thoracic oligo-recurrence/metastatic of NLCLC treated with SBRT were reviewed. Thoracic oligo-recurrence/was defined as 1-3 loco-regional confined to lung lobe, hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes, bronchial stump, or chest wall. Primary endpoints included local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. Prognostic factors that affected these patients were analyzed by the univariate and multivariate analysis by Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models, respectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up time after salvage SBRT was 48.5 months. Measuring from the date of salvage SBRT, the median OS of the 44 patients was 52.60 (95% CI: 29.59-75.60) months. 1-,3-and 5-year OS rates were 97.7%, 65.3% and 47.7%, respectively. The 1-,3-year and 5-year LC rates were 97.7%, 85.1% and 80.1%, respectively. At 1, 3 and 5 years, the PFS rates were 77.1%, 28.8% and 5.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that pre-SBRT neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were independent prognostic factors (p < 0.05). The treatment-related side-effects were well tolerated. No patients developed grade 3 or greater pulmonary toxicity. CONCLUSION: SBRT is a promising salvage therapeutic option for postoperative thoracic oligo-recurrence/metastasis of non-small-cell lung cancer with acceptable toxicity. Low pre-SBRT neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and low Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were associated with a better prognosis and longer survival and might be considered as reliable and independent prognostic factors in these patients treated with SBRT.

Genetic analysis of rapidly progressing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous investigations have been performed to explore candidate biomarker proteins in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, which could predict the response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Here we report a patient with unresectable ESCC who had unsatisfactory effects with radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy. We performed genetic analysis in this patient to gain insights about the cause of the rapid progression. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 65-year-old man presented with food obstruction, hoarse voice and choking on drinking water for 2 months, and pain behind the breastbone for 1 month. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was clinically diagnosed with ESCC and staged as T4N1M1 Stage IV. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with CRT and immunotherapy. Mutational analyses through high throughput DNA sequencing methodology (next generation sequencing; NGS) was performed on the patient's blood sample. OUTCOMES: The tumor progressed rapidly during the treatment period, and the patient passed away only 3 months from the onset of symptoms. CONCLUSION: Although the role of TP53 gene and PIK3CA gene in the progression, treatment and sensitivity of esophageal cancer has been studied, the mechanism of their simultaneous appearance has not been demonstrated in relevant studies. We speculate that the reason for the rapid progression in this patient during active treatment might be related to this. Further studies are needed to validate our observations.

Combing stereotactic body radiotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors after oligoprogression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy has brought substantial benefit for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, resistance may occur, of which oligoprogression is most common. There are no standard strategies to overcome acquired resistance, thus exploring potential effective approaches is critical. Our study evaluated the clinical outcome of combing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in oligoprogressive NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced NSCLC who received SBRT for oligoprogressive lesions after acquired resistance to CPIs in our hospital between January 2015 and January 2021. Acquired resistance was defined as initial complete/partial response (CR/PR) followed by progression/death. Oligo patterns of acquired resistance were defined as progression in ≤2 sites of disease. We evaluated the local control rate (LR), progression-free survival (PFS-PO), overall survival (OS-PO), and safety of combing SBRT after oligoprogression. RESULTS: Among 177 patients reviewed, 24 patients were included. Fifteen (62.5%) were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, and 20 (83.3%) were with stage IV. Before oligoprogression, immunotherapy was used as first-line treatment in 16 (66.7%) patients, and 4 (16.7%) received monotherapy. After combing SBRT with CPIs, the median PFS-PO and OS-PO were 11 months (95% CI: 8-NA) and 34 months (95% CI: 19-NA). The median LC of 34 oligoprogressed lesions was 43 months (95% CI: 7.7-78.3). The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 100% and 81.8%, respectively. Patients with adenocarcinoma, lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) (≥1), and positive PD-L1 tended to achieve favorable survival benefits. CONCLUSIONS: We observed considerable benefit of local control and survival by combing SBRT in patients with oligoprogression after required resistance to CPIs in NSCLC. The adverse events are well managed. Our results suggest that combing SBRT with CPIs could be a potential strategy to overcome acquired resistance.

Analysis of the efficacy, safety and survival factors of stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with recurrence of pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using Cyber Knife (CK) in the treatment of patients with recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgery, and analyze its survival-related factors. METHODS: The primary endpoint was freedom from local progression (FFLP) and local control (LC) rate after CK. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), symptom relief and toxicities. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the optimal cut-off values of inflammatory composite indicators NLR, PLR, SII and PNI. The prognostic factors that affected these patients were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were enrolled. Median local recurrence disease free interval（DFI）was 11.3 (1.3-30.6) months, LC was 81.5% and 37.0% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Median PFS was 7.1 (1.3-27.1) months. Median OS was 11.3 (1.3-30.6) months. Symptom alleviation was observed in 16 of 17 patients (94.1%) within 2 weeks after CK. Subsequent chemotherapy, CA199≥50% decrease after CK were independent prognostic factors for OS (all P <0.05). CONCLUSION: SBRT is a safe and effective treatment approach for recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Encouraging local control rate, low toxicity, and effective symptom relief suggests the vital role of CK in the treatment of these patients. This clinical application needs to be further studied in the combination of CK and multimodal therapy.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with raltitrexed and nedaplatin regimen for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study reported here was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of raltitrexed and nedaplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with unresectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Eligible patients were adults with newly diagnosed untreated, unresectable esophageal cancer in stages I to IV with lymph node metastases or cervical esophageal cancer. Patients received nedaplatin 25 mg/m per day on day 1-3, raltitrexed 3 mg/m on days 1 repeated every 21 days for 2 cycles, and combined concurrent radiotherapy (2 Gy/fraction, total dose of 60 Gy). RESULT: Thirty patients were included with squamous cell carcinoma. The median follow-up duration was 24 months. The overall response rate was 90%. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates for all patients were 70.4% and 55.7% with a median survival time of 30 months, and the median progression free survival was 20 month. The major toxicities were leukopenia and thrombopenia, with grade 3 to 4 leukopenia and thrombopenia were 50% and 30% of patients. CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with raltitrexed and nedaplatin agents frequently caused myelosuppression but was highly active and suggested to be a promising treatment option for locally advanced ESCC.

Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Oligometastases, Oligoprogression, or Local Control of Dominant Tumors.

AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with oligometastases, oligoprogression, or local control of dominant tumors after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and establish a nomogram model to predict the prognosis for these patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A cohort of 94 patients with 162 mCRC metastases was treated with SBRT at a single institution. Treatment indications were oligometastases, oligoprogression, and local control of dominant tumors. End points of this study were the outcome in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local progression (LP), and cumulative incidence of starting or changing systemic therapy (SCST). In addition, univariate and multivariable analyses to assess variable associations were performed. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. RESULTS: Median PFS were 12.6 months, 6.8 months, and 3.7 months for oligometastases, oligoprogression, and local control of dominant tumors, respectively. 0-1 performance status, < 10 ug/L pre-SBRT CEA, and ≤ 2 metastases were significant predictors of higher PFS on multivariate analysis. Median OS were 40.0 months, 26.1 months, and 6.5 months for oligometastases, oligoprogression, and local control of dominant tumors, respectively. In the multivariate analysis of the cohort, the independent factors for survival were indication, performance status, pre-SBRT CEA, and PTV, all of which were selected into the nomogram. The calibration curve for probability of survival showed the good agreement between prediction by nomogram and actual observation. The C-index of the nomogram for predicting survival was 0.848. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT for metastases derived from colorectal cancer offered favorable survival and symptom palliation without significant complications. The proposed nomogram could provide individual prediction of OS for patients with mCRC after SBRT.

Failure patterns and outcomes of dose escalation of stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare recurrence patterns and outcomes of biologically effective dose (BED10, α/ß = 10) of 60-70 Gy with those of a BED10 >70 Gy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: Patients from three centers with a biopsy and a radiographically proven LAPC were retrospectively included and data were prospectively collected from June 2012 to June 2019. Radiotherapy was delivered by stereotactic body radiation therapy. Recurrences were categorized as in-field, marginal, and outside-the-field recurrence. Patients in two groups were required to receive abdominal enhanced contrast CT or MRI every 2-3 months and CA19-9 examinations every month during follow-up. Treatment-related toxicities were evaluated every month. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, there were 486 patients in each group. The median prescription dose of the two groups was 37 Gy/5-8 f (range: 36-40.8 Gy/5-8 f) and 42 Gy/5-8 f (range: 40-49.6 Gy/5-8 f), respectively. The median OS of patients with a BED10 >70 Gy and a BED10 60-70 Gy was 20.3 months (95% CI: 19.1-21.5 months) and 18.2 months (95% CI: 17.8-18.6 months) respectively (p < 0.001). The median PFS of the two cohorts was 15.4 months (95% CI: 14.2-16.6 months) and 13.3 months (95% CI: 12.9-13.7 months) respectively (p < 0.001). A higher incidence of in-field and marginal recurrence was found in patients with BED10 of 60-70 Gy (in-field: 97/486 versus 72/486, p = 0.034; marginal: 109/486 versus 84/486, p = 0.044). However, more patients with BED10 >70 Gy had grade 2 or 3 acute (87/486 versus 64/486, p = 0.042) and late gastrointestinal toxicities (77/486 versus 55/486, p = 0.039) than those with BED10 of 60-70 Gy. CONCLUSION: BED10 >70 Gy was found to have the best survival benefits along with a higher incidence of acute and late gastrointestinal toxicities. Therefore, a higher dose may be required in the case of patients' good tolerance.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with gemcitabine plus capecitabine for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, toxicity, and prognostic factors of SBRT combined with gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP) in treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: A total of 56 patients with LAPC treated with SBRT combined with GEM-CAP were reviewed from October 2010 to October 2016. The median total prescription dose at five fractions was 40 Gy (30-50 Gy). The patients were subjected to two cycles of GEM-CAP before SBRT. GEM-CAP chemotherapy was then offered for four cycles or until disease tolerance or progression. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The median OS and PFS from the date of diagnosis was 19 (95% CI 14.6-23.4) and 12 months (95% CI 8.34-15.66), respectively. The 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 82.1% and 35.7%, whereas the 1-year and 2-year PFS rates were 48.2% and 14.3%, respectively. The median carbohydrate antigen 19-9-determined PFS time was 11 months (95% CI 5.77-16.24). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor diameter, lymph node metastasis, pre-treatment CA19-9 level, and post-treatment CA19-9 decline were independent prognostic factors (p < 0.05). Acute toxicity was minimal, with two cases (3.6%) experiencing grade 3 duodenal obstruction. No adverse events greater than grade 3 occurred. In late toxicity, three patients (5.4%) developed grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity and two (3.6%) suffered from perforation caused by grade 4 radiation enteritis and intestinal fistula. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of Cyberknife SBRT and GEM-CAP achieved excellent efficacy with acceptable toxicity for LAPC.

5-Androstenediol prevents radiation injury in mice by promoting NF-κB signaling and inhibiting AIM2 inflammasome activation.

In the present study, the therapeutic effects of 5-androstenediol on radiation-induced myeloid suppression and tissue damage in mice and the possible mechanism were explored. The mice were subjected to whole-body irradiation, and 5-androstenediol was administered subcutaneously at different times and doses. The evaluation of the survival rate showed that the administration of 5-androstenediol every three days post-irradiation was the most effective in decreasing the death of the mice. Additionally, 5-androstenediol dose-dependently reduced the death caused by 9 Gy radiation. The pharmacological mechanism was investigated by blood analysis, western blot analysis, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry. 5-Androstenediol significantly ameliorated myeloid suppression, as demonstrated by elevated levels of total white blood cells, including neutrophils and platelets, in the peripheral blood. By H&E staining, we found that radiation-induced myeloid suppression in the bone marrow and spleen, as well as tissue damage in the lung and colon, was significantly ameliorated by treatment with 5-androstenediol. Immunohistochemistry showed elevated phosphorylation of p65 in the bone marrow and spleen, indicating the activation of NF-κB signaling. Moreover, 5-androstenediol markedly hampered the radiation-induced activation of caspase-1 and GSDMD in the colon by decreasing the interaction between AIM2 and ASC. Taken together, our results suggest that, by promoting NF-κB signaling and inhibiting inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis, 5-androstenediol can be used as a radioprotective drug.