Comparison of proximal and distal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy for complete duplex kidneys in children.

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy of proximal and distal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy (UU) for complete duplex kidneys in children. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic UU for complete duplex kidneys between December 2016 and July 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. 71 patients who had normal lower pole moiety without vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) were recruited. All of them underwent ultrasound, voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), renal scintigraphy, and magnetic resonance urography preoperatively. Proximal laparoscopic UU was performed in 35 patients and distal laparoscopic UU in 36 patients. Double J stents were placed in normal lower pole moieties. Clinical data, including general information, diagnosis, surgical management, imaging characteristics, clinical symptoms and postoperative complications (classified according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification), and length of stay were recorded. Measurement date comparisons between groups were performed by t test, counting date were analyzed by chi-square test. RESULTS: The study consisted of 71 patients (56 females and 15 males) with complete duplex kidneys (41 in left kidney and 30 in right kidney). The patients' mean age was 34 m (range 3-161 m) and follow-up ranged from 25 to 81 m. No significant difference was found in age and follow-up time between the two groups. Laparoscopic UU was performed in all patients successfully. The operation time of the two groups was 108.42 ± 26.95 min for distal UU vs 121.46 ± 35.15 min for proximal UU(p = 0.14). No significant difference in postoperative complications was seen between the two groups (22.2% vs 31.4%, p = 0.345). However, in terms of the grading of postoperative complications, the proximal UU group had a higher grade (3 of them had a grade of IV) and more serious complications. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of complications between distal and proximal UU. Compared with proximal laparoscopic UU, distal laparoscopic UU is easier to perform with less injury to the peripheral tissues. Postoperative complications of proximal UU are more serious and more difficult to manage. We recommend complete duplex kidney ureteral reconstruction with distal UU.

Modified onlay island flap versus tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for hypospadias reoperation.

This study aimed to assess the outcomes of modified onlay island flap (MOIF) urethroplasty for hypospadias reoperation. A retrospective analysis was conducted using clinical data on children reoperated with MOIF or tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty for hypospadias in the Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Nanjing, China) from December 2016 to September 2020. A total of 90 children with hypospadias who failed primary repair and were reoperated on with MOIF (MOIF group, n = 46) or TIP urethroplasty (TIP group, n = 44) were recruited. All children were postoperatively followed up for at least 6 months. Six patients with postoperative urinary fistula, 2 patients with glans dehiscence, and 1 patient with urethral diverticulum were reported in the MOIF group, while 7 patients with postoperative urinary fistula, 2 patients with urethral stricture, and 1 patient with glans dehiscence were reported in the TIP group. Postoperative infection, flap necrosis and other complications were not recorded. A total of 37 (80.4%) patients in the MOIF group and 34 (77.3%) patients in the TIP group were successfully reoperated. Although the success rates of MOIF and TIP urethroplasty are comparable, pediatricians should master different types of repair techniques for individualized hypospadias reoperation. MOIF urethroplasty can be recommended after failure of the primary repair.

[Staged urethroplasty by tubularization of reconstructed urethral plate using the preputial island flap for severe hypospadias].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application value of staged urethroplasty by tubularization of the reconstructed urethral plate using the preputial island flap in the treatment of severe hypospadias. METHODS: From May 2014 to February 2019, 91 children with severe hypospadias received one- or two-stage urethroplasty by tubularization of the reconstructed urethral plate with the preputial island flap. We compared the patients' age, glans diameter, length of the straightened urethral defect, and incidence rates of postoperative urethral fistula, urethral diverticulum, glans dehiscence and urethral stricture between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: The 56 patients in the one-stage group were aged 7－144 (21.92 ± 13.37) months old, the urethral defect 3－5 (3.565 ± 0.528) cm in length and the glans 1.0－1.4 (1.195 ± 0.083) cm in diameter, and the 35 in the two-stage group aged 7 －153 (24.78 ± 13.59) months, the urethral defect 3－5 (3.857 ± 0.696) cm in length and the glans 0.8－2.5 (1.206 ± 0.389) cm in diameter. There were no statistically significant differences in age, glans diameter and the length of urethral defect between the two groups. In the one-stage group were found 18 cases of postoperative urinary fistula, 1 case of glans dehiscence, 1 case of urethral diverticulum, and 1 case of both urethral diverticulum and glans dehiscence, all cured by repeated urinary fistula repair/urethroplasty. No urinary fistula occurred in the two-stage group postoperatively except 4 cases of glans dehiscence, of which 2 were cured by repeated repair and the other 2 refused reoperation. The success rate was significantly higher in the two-stage than in the one-stage urethroplasty group (88.57% vs 62.50%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage urethroplasty by tubularization of the reconstructed urethral plate with the preputial island flap can significantly reduce the incidence of urethral fistula in patients with severe hypospadias, but may increase the number of operations in those who do not need staged surgery. The necessity of two-stage urethroplasty can be determined according to the development of the glans, the degree of penile curvature, and the length of urethra defect.

[Application of the lateral preputial fascial island flap in hypospadias reoperation].

Objective: To evaluate the application and effect of the lateral preputial fascial island flap (LPFIF) in hypospadias reoperation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data on the children patients undergoing hypospadias reoperation with LPFIF in our Department of Urology from December 2016 to June 2019. RESULTS: A total of 85 cases were included in this study, including 18 cases of LPFIF, 19 cases of Duplay technique, 25 cases of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIP) and 23 cases of Mathieu urethroplasty. The patients were aged from 18 months to 12 years and 8 months, averaging 4.6 years. Postoperatively, all the children were followed up for ≥ 6 months, which found satisfactory appearance of the penis body and glans, the urethral orifice in the normal position of the glans, and the external orifice of the urethra fissured. Urethral fistula occurred in 2 cases and glans dehiscence in 1 after LPFIF; 5 of the patients presented urethral fistula after Duplay; 3 developed urethral fistula and 1 urethral stricture after TIP; 6 showed urethral fistula and 2 glans dehiscence after Mathieu urethroplasty. No postoperative urethral stricture, urethral diverticulum or flap necrosis occurred in any of the cases. Hypospadias reoperation succeeded in 83.3% (15/18) of the cases after LPFIF. The urine flow curve of the LPFIF cases was bell-shaped or high flat-shaped, with a maximum urinary flow rate of 8.56 ± 3.99 ml/s and an average urinary flow rate of 5.23 ± 2.32 ml/s, not significantly different from those of the TIP and Duplay cases. CONCLUSIONS: There is no statistically significant difference in the success rate of hypospadias reoperation between TIP and LPFIF. Urethroplasty with LPFIF can be used as one of the surgical options for hypospadias reoperation.

Retrospective analysis of individual risk factors for urethrocutaneous fistula after onlay hypospadias repair in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: To retrospectively identify the individual risk factors for the urethrocutaneous fistula (UCF) in pediatric patients after hypospadias repair (HR) with onlay island flap urethroplasty. METHODS: A total of 167 patients who underwent primary HR at Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Children Hospital from January 2009 to December 2012 were enrolled. Clinical data including the patient' age at HR, hypospadias type and urethral defect length were documented. RESULTS: Among 167 patients, 12.6% patients (n = 21) developed UCF after HR. Postoperative UCF occurred in 3.9% (3/76) cases at age of 0-2 years, 14.3% (9/63) at 2-4 years, 20.0% (2/10) at 4-6 years and 38.9% (7/18) at 6-12 years. The incidences of UCF were 12.0% (3/25), 11.4% (5/132) and 30.0% (3/10) for distal, middle and proximal types of hypospadias. As to the urethral defect length, the incidences of UCF were 8.2% (5/61) in patients with a length of ≤ 2 cm, 12.8% (9/70) in 2-3 cm, 22.6% (7/31) in 3-4 cm and 0% (0/5) in above 4 cm. Older age at HR was significantly associated with the high incidence of UCF formation (P = 0.004), while the hypospadias type and urethral defect length did not affect it (P = 0.264 and P = 0.312, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The patient' age at HR was a risk factor for the UCF formation after HR, and treatment of HR within two years old might be with the least incidence of UCF.