Anesthesia management of combined sequential heart-liver transplantation using a caval clamp without venovenous bypass: A case report.

Familial amyloid polyneuropathy, an autosomal-dominant disease due to mutations in the transthyretin gene, often affects the heart and liver, and is treated best with a combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT). Although it remains an uncommonly performed procedure, the number of patients undergoing CHLT is increasing. Because of the complexity associated with dual pathophysiology, CHLT poses an extraordinary challenge for anesthesia management. Either both heart and liver transplantation are performed on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); or heart transplantation is performed on CPB, followed by liver transplantation with venovenous bypass. Recent reports suggested that liver transplantation can be performed without bypass using the inferior vena cava-sparing technique. However, both bypass and caval sparing technique have their own complications. Here, we present the anesthesia management in a case of sequential heart-liver transplantation using a routine caval cross-clamp technique without venovenous bypass. A 48-year-old man complaining of chest tightness, chest pain, and shortness of breath was diagnosed with amyloid cardiomyopathy. Cardiac ultrasonography revealed thickening of ventricular walls and left ventricular systolic insufficiency (ejection fraction decreased from 46% to ∼20% in 6 months), which was refractory to medical therapy. Symptoms occurred repeatedly. Therefore, CHLT was planned. Heart transplantation was performed smoothly under general anesthesia and standard CPB. His heart functioned well with dobutamine and epinephrine infusion. Subsequently, the patient was weaned from CPB. Liver transplantation was planned using the piggyback procedure with the caval sparing technique. However, upon caval clamping, unexpected blood loss occurred. Clamping of the caval was tested followed by cross-clamping. Norepinephrine, epinephrine, and dobutamine were administered. After the hepatic vein was anastomosed, the clamp was released and nitroglycerin was administered. Hemodynamics was stable, and the patient was discharged after 37 days of hospitalization. The case indicates that CHLT could be performed using caval clamp without venovenous bypass in selected patients.

The research on long-term clinical effects and patients' satisfaction of gabapentin combined with oxycontin in treatment of severe cancer pain.

Gabapentin has been used as an adjuvant for treatment of cancer pain. Previous studies showed that opioids combined with gabapentin for management of cancer pain reduced the dosage of opioids.The objective of this study was to explore the clinical effect and patients' satisfaction of oxycontin combined with gabapentin in treatment of severe cancer pain. After titration of morphine, 60 severe cancer patients with visual analog score (VAS) more than 7 were randomly divided into trial group (n = 30) and control group (n = 30). The control group was administered oxycontin and placebo, and the trial group was given oxycontin and gabapentin. VAS score was recorded pre- and post-treatment; while daily dose of oxycontin, daily cost of pain relief and life quality score were observed 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months post-treatment. We found that daily dose of oxycontin 1 month post was comparable between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Three months post, compared with control group (58.0 ±â€Š15.2 mg), average daily dose of oxycontin was significant lower in trial group (33.4 ±â€Š11 mg) (P < 0.001). Average daily cost of pain relief in trail group (34.5 ±â€Š10.2 RMB) was less than the control group (52.4 ±â€Š13.7 RMB) (P < 0.001). Life quality score increased in all of the patients in both group post-treatment (P < 0.05); while life quality score in trail group was greater than in control group 3 months (46.8 ±â€Š4.5 vs 43.5 ±â€Š4.6, P = 0.007) and 6 months (46.5 ±â€Š4.8 vs 41.4 ±â€Š4.3, P < 0.001) post-treatment. The incidence of drowsiness and dizziness was comparable between the 2 groups (P > 0.05), while the incidence of nausea and vomiting (P = 0.038), and constipation (P < 0.001) was higher in the control group.We concluded that oxycontin combined with gabapentin used in severe cancer pain management can control pain effectively, decreased the dose of oxycontin and the cost of cancer pain relief, and reduced the incidence of nausea and vomiting, and constipation, increased the life quality.