Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Mol Med Rep ; 12(2): 2355-9, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25901521

ABSTRACT

MicroRNAs (miRs) are a class of small non-coding RNAs that are involved in the regulation of gene expression, and in cancer development and progression. In the present study, miR-320 expression was found to be significantly reduced in glioma tissue in comparison with that in adjacent healthy tissues. In the present study, in vitro analyses demonstrated that overexpression of miR-320 inhibited cell proliferation and metastasis, while antisense miR-320 oligonucleotides enhanced cell proliferation and migration in U251 and SHG-44 glioma cell lines, compared with that in negative control cells. Protein expression of E2F1, a cell-cycle regulator, was negatively regulated by miR-320. Therefore, the present study provides novel insights into the association between miR-320 and glioma development.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/genetics , E2F1 Transcription Factor/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Glioma/genetics , MicroRNAs/genetics , Base Sequence , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Movement , Cell Proliferation , E2F1 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Genes, Reporter , Glioma/metabolism , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Luciferases/genetics , Luciferases/metabolism , MicroRNAs/antagonists & inhibitors , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Molecular Sequence Data , Oligonucleotides, Antisense/genetics , Oligonucleotides, Antisense/metabolism
2.
Mol Med Rep ; 10(4): 2160-4, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25070000

ABSTRACT

Small non­coding RNAs from the microRNA family (miRs) are important elements in the posttranscriptional control of gene expression. miRs are known to regulate numerous cellular processes and are of crucial importance during development and in pathological conditions, including tumor initiation and progression. In the present study, the expression level of miR­181 was reduced in glioma tissues compared with the adjacent normal tissues. The enforced expression of miR­181 was able to inhibit cell proliferation in U251 and SHG­44 cells, while antisense miR­181 oligonucleotides (antisense miR­181) enhanced cell proliferation. At the molecular level, these results further revealed that the expression of cyclin B1, a positive cell­cycle regulator, was negatively regulated by miR­181. Therefore, the data reported in the present study demonstrates that miR­181 is an important regulator in glioma. These results may contribute to improving the understanding of the key misregulated miRNAs in glioma.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Cyclin B1/metabolism , Glioma/pathology , MicroRNAs/metabolism , 3' Untranslated Regions , Base Sequence , Brain/metabolism , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation , Cyclin B1/chemistry , Cyclin B1/genetics , Glioma/metabolism , Humans , MicroRNAs/antagonists & inhibitors , Oligonucleotides, Antisense/metabolism , Sequence Alignment
3.
Tumour Biol ; 35(7): 6687-93, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24705863

ABSTRACT

We conducted a meta-analysis in order to investigate the relationships between PTEN gene mutations and the prognosis in glioma. The following electronic databases were searched for relevant articles without any language restrictions: Web of Science (1945 ~ 2013), the Cochrane Library Database (Issue 12, 2013), PubMed (1966 ~ 2013), EMBASE (1980 ~ 2013), CINAHL (1982 ~ 2013), and the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1982 ~ 2013). Meta-analyses were conducted using the STATA software (Version 12.0, Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas USA). Hazard ratio (HR) with its corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated. Six independent cohort studies with a total of 357 glioma patients met our inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis results indicated that glioma patients with PTEN gene mutations exhibited a significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than those without PTEN gene mutations (HR = 3.66, 95%CI = 2.02 ~ 5.30, P < 0.001). Ethnicity-stratified subgroup analysis demonstrated that PTEN gene mutations were closely linked to poor prognosis in glioma among Americans (HR = 3.72, 95%CI = 1.72 ~ 5.73, P < 0.001), while similar correlations were not observed among populations in Sweden, Italy, and Malaysia (all P > 0.05). Our meta-analysis provides direct and strong evidences for the speculation of PTEN gene mutations' correlation with poor prognosis of glioma patients.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Glioma/genetics , PTEN Phosphohydrolase/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Mutation , Prognosis
4.
PLoS One ; 9(2): e87432, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24586276

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although international guideline recommended routine intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring for patients with severe traumatic brain injury(TBI), there were conflicting outcomes attributable to ICP monitoring according to the published studies. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICP monitoring in patients with TBI. METHODS: Based on previous reviews, PubMed and two Chinese databases (Wangfang and VIP) were further searched to identify eligible studies. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included unfavourable outcome, adverse events, length of ICU stay and length of hospital stay. Weighted mean difference (WMD), odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using fixed-effects or random-effects model. RESULTS: two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and seven cohort studies involving 11,038 patients met the inclusion criteria. ICP monitoring was not associated with a significant reduction in mortality (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.87-1.54), with substantial heterogeneity (I(2) = 80%, P<0.00001), which was verified by the sensitivity analyses. No significant difference was found in the occurrence of unfavourable outcome (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.99-1.98; I(2) = 4%, P = 0.35) and adverse events (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.64-1.70; I(2) = 78%, P = 0.03). However, we should be cautious to the result of adverse events because of the substantial heterogeneity in the comparison. Furthermore, longer ICU and hospital stay were the consistent tendency according to the pooled studies. CONCLUSIONS: No benefit was found in patients with TBI who underwent ICP monitoring. Considering substantial clinical heterogeneity, further large sample size RCTs are needed to confirm the current findings.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/pathology , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Monitoring, Physiologic/adverse effects , Monitoring, Physiologic/mortality , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Models, Statistical , Odds Ratio
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...