Comparison of 2-Octylcyanoacrylate Versus 5-0 Fast-Absorbing Gut During Linear Wound Closures and the Effect on Wound Cosmesis.

BACKGROUND: Although the use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate (OCA) in cutaneous surgery offers increased efficiency, there is scant data comparing scar outcomes achieved with OCA versus 5-0 fast-absorbing gut suture (FG). OBJECTIVE: To compare scar cosmesis achieved with OCA versus FG for surgical wound closure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 44 patients with postoperative defects of at least 3 cm were included. Half of each wound was randomized to receive closure with either OCA or FG. At 3 months, patients and 2 blinded observers evaluated each scar using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). RESULTS: The total observer POSAS score (mean [SD]) for the side repaired with OCA (12.3 [4.72]) and the side that received FG (11.6 [4.36]) did not differ significantly (p = .40). There was no significant difference in the total patient POSAS scores between closure with OCA (14.9 [8.67]) and FG (14.6 [8.90]) (p = .70). Based on observer POSAS scores, scar pigmentation was significantly worse on the scar half repaired with OCA (1.98 [0.91]) compared with FG (1.79 [0.80]) (p = .05). CONCLUSION: With the exception of inferior scar pigmentation with OCA, there was no statistically significant difference in wound cosmesis after linear wound closure with OCA versus FG.

Dermal suture only versus layered closure: A randomized, split wound comparative effectiveness trial.

BACKGROUND: Layered closure of cutaneous wounds is a commonly used surgical practice. However, there are studies that suggest the additional layer of epidermal sutures might not be necessary. OBJECTIVE: To compare scar outcomes between the single-layer deep-dermal suture technique and the conventional layered suture technique for primary closure of cutaneous wounds. METHODS: A total of 49 patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded, split scar study to compare the conventional bilayered closure technique with the single-layer deep-dermal suturing technique for primary closure of wounds. The primary outcome measure was mean sum Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: At the 3-month follow-up, there was a statistically significant difference in the mean total POSAS scores for both the blinded observer and patients, indicating a preference for the side with the standard layered closure. However, at the 12-month follow-up, this difference was lost, with the exception of scar color, which was significantly more noticeable on the wound side closed with only dermal sutures. LIMITATION: Single-center study. CONCLUSION: Three months after surgery, the layered closure technique resulted in a slightly better scar outcome than the single-layered closure containing only dermal sutures. At 12-months' follow-up, this difference diminished, with scars for both sides appearing similar.