Efficacy of Lenvatinib Combined with Anti-PD-1 Antibodies plus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study.

Purpose: The prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is extremely poor, and systemic therapy is currently the mainstream treatment. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (triple therapy) in patients with HCC and PVTT. Materials and Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included patients with HCC and PVTT who received triple therapy, were aged between 18 and 75 years, classified as Child Pugh class A or B, and had at least one measurable lesion. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates, and disease control rates were analyzed to assess efficacy. Treatment-related adverse events were analyzed to assess safety profiles. Results: During a median follow-up of 11.23 months (range, 3.07-34.37 months), the median OS was greater than 24 months, and median PFS was 12.53 months. The two-year OS rate was 54.9%. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 69.8% (74/106) and 84.0% (89/106), respectively; 20.8% (22/106) of the patients experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events and no treatment-related deaths occurred. The conversion rate to liver resection was 31.1% (33/106), with manageable postoperative complications. The median OS was not reached in the surgery group, but was 19.08 months in the non-surgery group. The median PFS in the surgery and non-surgery groups were 20.50 and 9.00 months, respectively. Conclusion: Triple therapy showed promising survival benefits and high response rates in patients with HCC and PVTT, with manageable adverse effects.

The TAE score predicts prognosis of unresectable HCC patients treated with TACE plus lenvatinib with PD-1 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors (triple therapy) exhibits promising efficacy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). We aimed to evaluate the prognosis of patients with uHCC who received triple therapy and develop a prognostic scoring model to identify patients who benefit the most from triple therapy. METHODS: A total of 246 patients with uHCC who received triple therapy at eight centers were included and assigned to the training and validation cohorts. Prognosis was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier curves. The prognostic model was developed by utilizing predictors of overall survival (OS), which were identified through the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In the training cohort, the 3-year OS was 52.0%, with a corresponding progression-free survival (PFS) of 30.6%. The median PFS was 13.2 months [95% confidence interval, 9.7-16.7]. Three variables (total bilirubin ≥ 17 µmol/L, alpha-fetoprotein ≥ 400 ng/mL, and extrahepatic metastasis) were predictors of poor survival and were used for developing a prognostic model (TAE score). The 2-year OS rates in the favorable (0 points), intermediate (1 point), and dismal groups (2-3 points) were 96.9%, 61.4%, and 11.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). The PFS was also stratified according to the TAE score. These findings were confirmed in an external validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Triple therapy showed encouraging clinical outcomes, and the TAE score aids in identifying patients who would benefit the most from triple therapy.

Clinical Complete Response After Conversion Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Is Salvage Hepatectomy Necessary?

Background: This study aimed to determine whether salvage hepatectomy offers prognostic advantages for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after conversion therapy. Methods: A total of 74 consecutive uHCC patients with cCR after conversion therapy at seven major cancer centers in China between October 2018 and December 2021 were included. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize the influence of potential confounders. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between the surgical group and the non-surgical group. Results: Before PSM, 45 patients received salvage hepatectomy, and 29 patients received nonsurgical treatment. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year DFS rates were 77.8%, 61.5%, and 61.5% in the surgical group and 81.2%, 60.9%, and 60.9% in the non-surgical group, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 92.9%, 92.9%, and 69.7% in the surgical group and 100%, 70%, and 70% in the non-surgical group, respectively. There were no statistical differences in DFS and OS between groups [hazard ratio (HR)=0.715, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.250-2.043, p=0.531; HR=0.980, 95% CI: 0.177-5.418, p=0.982, respectively]. After PSM, 26 pairs of patents were selected; there remained no significant differences in DFS and OS between these two groups (HR=1.547, 95% CI: 0.512-4.669, p=0.439; HR=1.024, 95% CI: 0.168-6.242, p=0.979, respectively). Conclusion: Through the study, it tend to show that salvage hepatectomy may be not essential for uHCC patients with cCR, especially for patients with a high risk of surgical complications. Prospective trials with long term follow-up are warranted to evaluate this treatment option.

Prognostic effects of different malignant obstructive jaundice sites on percutaneous biliary intervention: A retrospective controlled study.

Purpose: To compare the survival prognosis of percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting (PTBS) in the treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ) at different horizontal sites. Methods: A total of 120 patients with MOJ who underwent biliary stenting were retrospectively included and analyzed and divided into the high-position group (36 patients), middle-position group (43 patients), and low-position group (41 patients) according to biliary obstruction plane by biliary anatomy. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to test for differences in the overall survival (OS), risk assessment of death and potential risk factors for 1-year survival were analyzed using multifactorial Cox regression. Results: The median survival of the high-, middle-, low-position groups were 16, 8.6, and 5.6 months, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.017). The 1-year survival rate was 67.6%, 41.9%, and 41.5% in the high-, middle-, low-position groups (P < 0.05), and the 1-year risk of death was 2.35 and 2.93 times higher in the medium- and low-position groups, respectively. The incidences of the main complications were 25%, 48.8%, and 65.9% in the high-, middle-, and low-position groups, respectively, (P = 0.002). While the differences in median stent patency were not statistically significant (P > 0.05) in the groups, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, and total bilirubin levels decreased gradually in each group at 1 month and 3 months after interventional therapy (P < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in the decrease between the groups. Conclusions: Different levels of biliary obstruction in patients with MOJ affect survival, especially at 1 year, where high obstruction treated with PTBS has a low incidence of complications and a low risk of death.