Preliminary study of short-term outcomes and learning curves of robotic-assisted THA: comparison between closed platform robotic system and open platform robotic system.

BACKGROUND: Both closed platform and open platform robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) have recently been recommended as a viable treatment option for achieving accurate positioning of components. Yet, limited studies paid attention to the differences between the closed platform robotic system and the open platform robotic system. Hence, this study aimed to investigate clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, complication rates and learning curve of two systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 62 patients (31 closed robotic system and 31 open robotic system) who underwent THA between February 2021 and January 2023. The demographics, operating time, cup positioning, complications and hip Harris score were evaluated. Learning curves of operation time was conducted using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. RESULTS: There were no differences in surgical time (76.7 ± 12.1 min vs. 72.3 ± 14.8 min), estimated blood loss (223.2 ± 13.2 ml vs. 216.9 ± 17 ml) and Harris Hip score (HHS) between closed platform robotic system and the open platform robotic system. The closed robotic system and the open robotic system were associated with a learning curve of 9 cases and 7 cases for surgical time respectively, based on the satisfying rate of Lewinnek's safe zone outliers (1/31, 96.8%) and no occurrence of complication. Both robotic systems had significant reduction in overall surgical time, the duration of acetabulum registration, and estimated blood loss between learning phase and proficiency phase. CONCLUSION: The authors suggest that the surgical outcomes and safe zone outlier rate of the open robotic-assisted THA were similar to those of the closed robotic-assisted THA. These two robotic-assisted are associated with comparable learning curves and both have the precise positioning of acetabular component. From learning phase to proficiency phase, the rate of positions within the safe zone differed only marginally (88.9-100% vs. 85.7-100%) based on a rather low number of patients. This is not a statistically significant difference. Therefore, we suggest that THA undergoing with the robotic-assisted system is the relatively useful way to achieve planned acetabular cup position so far.

Outcomes of dual mobility articulation total hip arthroplasty in ipsilateral residual poliomyelitis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with poliomyelitis underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) are known to be at higher risk of dislocation on account of muscular atrophy. This study aimed to investigate clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, complication rates, and survivorship of dual mobility THA in displaced femoral neck fractures of elderly with poliomyelitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 17 patients (17 hips) with residual poliomyelitis who underwent THA with dual mobility articulation. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Oxford hip score, and University of California Los Angeles activity (UCLA) score. Radiographic outcomes were examined by radiographs. Complications and re-operations following THA were recorded. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 77.05 months. The mean VAS, Oxford hip score, and UCLA score were improved significantly. In all but one patient, no complications were occurred. Re-operation was carried out in one patient due to posterior dislocation. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship with an end point of re-operation for any reason was 94.1%. CONCLUSIONS: THA with dual mobility system is proved to be effective in strengthening stability and reducing the risk of dislocation, which is suitable for patients with neuromuscular disease. Hence, in elderly with residual poliomyelitis, dual mobility THA is a valid choice as a treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures.

The role of routine postoperative laboratory tests following hip hemiarthroplasty for an elderly femoral neck fracture.

BACKGROUND: Performing postoperative laboratory tests following joint arthroplasty is a regular practice. However, the role of routine postoperative laboratory tests in primary hip arthroplasty is currently in doubt. This study aimed to assess the role of routine postoperative laboratory tests for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty and to evaluate the risk factors for postoperative laboratory testing abnormalities and related interventions. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed 735 consecutive patients with femoral neck fractures (FNFs) who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty at a single tertiary academic organization. Patient characteristic features and laboratory testing values were recorded. Logistic regression models were calculated to identify risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 321 elderly patients (> 75 years of age) were ultimately enrolled for analysis. Abnormal postoperative laboratory tests were found in 265 patients (82.6%). Only a minority of the included patients (7.5%) needed medical intervention to treat postoperative laboratory testing abnormalities. Multivariate logistic regression analysis reported that a higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (P = 0.03), abnormal preoperative haemoglobin level (P < 0.01), higher intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.01) and less frequent tranexamic acid use (P = 0.05) were risk factors for abnormal postoperative laboratory tests. Furthermore, a higher CCI has been identified as a risk factor for patients needing clinical interventions related to laboratory abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Because 92.5% of laboratory tests did not influence postoperative management, the authors suggest that routine laboratory tests after hip hemiarthroplasty for FNFs are less instructive for the majority of elderly patients. Nevertheless, for patients with identified risk factors, postoperative laboratory tests are still required to identify the abnormalities that need to be managed.

Diabetes mellitus accelerates the progression of osteoarthritis in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice by deteriorating bone microarchitecture, bone mineral composition, and bone strength of subchondral bone.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop an optimal diabetes-osteoarthritis (DM-OA) mouse model to validate that diabetes aggravates osteoarthritis (OA) and to evaluate the microarchitecture, chemical composition, and biomechanical properties of subchondral bone (SB) as a consequence of the DM-OA-induced damage induced. METHODS: Mice were randomly divided into three groups: DM-OA group, OA group, and sham group. Blood glucose levels, body weight, and food intake of all animals were recorded. Serum calcium (Ca) and osteocalcin (OCN) levels were compared in the three groups. The messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and protein expression of key regulators for bone metabolism were detected. A semi-quantitative grading system [Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI)] was used to evaluate cartilage and SB degeneration. Microspectroscopy, microindentations, micro-computed tomography (CT) imaging, and fracture load of compression testing were also used to evaluate trabecular SB properties. RESULTS: Glycemic monitoring and pancreas pathological results indicated stable high blood glucose and massive destruction of pancreas and islet cells in the DM-OA group. Serum levels of bone specific alkaline phosphatase (ALP-B) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) in the DM-group were higher than those of the other two groups while levels of serum Ca and OCN were lower. Meanwhile, the protein and mRNA expression of osteoblast-specific biomarkers [osteoprotegerin/receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (OPG/RANKL) ratio, collagen type I (COL-I), Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX-2), OCN] were suppressed, and osteoclast-specific biomarkers [sclerostin (SOST)] was elevated in the DM-OA group. The mineral-to-collagen ratio, microindentation elastic modulus, hardness, micro-architectural parameters, bone mineral density, and fracture load of SB trabecular bone of the DM-OA group joint were lower than those of the other two groups. On the other hand, The OARSI score, trabecular spacing, and structural model index of the DM-OA group joint were higher than those of the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The glycemic and pancreatic pathological results indicated that the DM-OA model was a simple and reliable model induced by streptozotocin (STZ) and surgery. The results revealed the mechanisms through which diabetes accelerates OA; that is, by damaging and deteriorating the functions of SB, including its microarchitecture, chemical composition, and biomechanical properties.

Hemiarthroplasty compared with internal fixation for treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Internal fixation (IF) with cannulated screws is the most widely accepted operation method for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in elderly patients. However, there were higher rate of reoperation, severe complications and poorer functional outcomes reported in these patients treated with IF. The purpose of this research is to compare the prognosis, complications, reoperation and mortality of bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA) with IF of cannulated screws in elderly patients. METHODS: All elderly patients (>75 years of age) with nondisplaced FNFs from January 2010 to December 2015 at our institution were included in this study. Patients treated with HA and IF with cannulated screws were compared. Outcome measures included the surgical complications, perioperative parameters, hip joint function, reoperation and mortality. RESULTS: The blood loss of HA group (150.0 ± 55.1 mL) was statistically more than IF group (40.5 ± 15.7 mL, p = 0.001). However, the blood transfusion rate was similar between two groups (p = 0.102). At the last follow-up, there were total 14 (34.1%) severe surgical complications in the IF group, compared to 9 (10.1%) in the HA group (P = 0.001). No difference was detected between two groups with respect to the HHS and VAS at the last follow-up. Compared with the HA group, the IF group had much more reoperation in the follow up period (p = 0.001). There was no statistically differences of mortality rate between HA group (39.3%, 35/89) and IF group (34.1%, 14/41) (p=0.571). CONCLUSIONS: As a treatment option for nondisplaced intracapsular FNFs in elderly patients, HA showed the merits of a less surgical complications and less reoperations, while IF demonstrated a shorter surgical time and less intraoperative blood loss. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in the hip joint function and mortality rate in midterm follow-up. Further evaluation with a longer follow-up is recommended to strengthen these findings.