Benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma in real life: confirmed effectiveness and contrasted effect on sputum eosinophilia versus exhaled nitric oxide fraction - PROMISE.

Background: Randomised controlled trials have shown that benralizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 receptor monoclonal antibody, reduces exacerbations and oral corticosteroid dose and improves asthma control and lung function in severe eosinophilic asthma. The aim of this study was to confirm results of randomised controlled trials in real life in a population of 73 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab for at least 12 months. Methods: Patients underwent careful monitoring of asthma exacerbations, exhaled nitric oxide fraction, lung function, asthma control and quality of life questionnaire responses and sputum induction, and gave a blood sample at baseline, after 6 months and then every year. Results: We found significant reductions in exacerbations (by 92%, p<0.0001) and oral corticosteroid dose (by 83%, p<0.001) after 6 months that were maintained over time, with 78% of patients able to stop oral corticosteroid therapy. Patients improved their Asthma Control Test (ACT) score (from 11.7±5.1 to 16.9±5.35, p<0.0001), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score (from 2.88±1.26 to 1.77±1.32, p<0.0001) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score (+1.04, p<0.0001) at 6 months and this was maintained during follow-up. Only 35% and 43% of patients reached asthma control according to an ACT score ≥20 and ACQ score <1.5, respectively. We observed stable post-bronchodilation lung function over time and a significant reduction in sputum eosinophil count, with 85% of patients exhibiting sputum eosinophil counts <3% after 6 months (p<0.01) with no effect on exhaled nitric oxide fraction. Conclusion: In our real-life study, we confirm the results published in randomised controlled trials showing a sharp reduction in exacerbations and oral corticosteroid therapy, an improvement in asthma control and quality of life, and a dramatic reduction in sputum eosinophil count.

Patients With Asthma Only Sensitized to Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxins Have More Exacerbations, Airflow Limitation, and Higher Levels of Sputum IL-5 and IgE.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins (SE) may act as superantigens and induce an intense T-cell activation, causing local production of polyclonal IgE and resultant eosinophil activation. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether asthma with sensitization to SE but not to common aeroallergens (AAs) displays different inflammatory characteristics. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study on a series of 110 consecutive patients with asthma recruited from the University Asthma Clinic of Liège. We compared clinical, functional, and inflammatory characteristics of this general population of patients with asthma categorized into 4 groups according to sensitization to AAs and/or SE. We also compared sputum supernatant cytokines in patients sensitized to SE or not. RESULTS: Patients with asthma sensitized only to AAs represented 30%, while 29% were sensitized to both AAs and SE. One-fifth of the population had no specific IgE. Sensitization to SE but not to AA (21%) was associated with later onset of disease, higher rate of exacerbations, nasal polyps, and more severe airway obstruction. As for airway type 2 biomarkers, patients presenting with specific IgE against SE displayed higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide, sputum IgE, and sputum IL-5 levels but not IL-4. We confirm that the presence of specific IgE against SE is associated with elevated serum IgE to levels well above those observed in patients sensitized only to AAs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that asthma specialists should measure specific IgE against SE during the phenotyping process because it may allow the identification of a subgroup of patients with more asthma exacerbations, more nasal polyposis and chronic sinusitis, lower lung function, and more intense type 2 inflammation.

[Dyspnea «sine materia¼]. / La dyspnée «sine materia¼.

Dyspnea is a symptom of respiratory discomfort commonly encountered in clinical practice which, in most of the cases, relates to a cardiopulmonary or a metabolic disorder. Its genesis is complex and results from numerous interactions within cortical and limbic brain areas following intero- and nociceptive stimuli. The term dyspnea «sine materia¼ points to a state where no clear underlying cardiopulmonary or metabolic pathology has been identified and we include here the hyperventilation syndrome and the physical deconditioning. Treatment of dyspnea «sine materia¼ is based on behavioural psychotherapy and on reathtletisation programme in case of physical deconditioning.

La dyspnée est un symptôme d'inconfort respiratoire extrêmement courant en médecine qui traduit, le plus souvent, un désordre cardiorespiratoire ou métabolique. Sa genèse est complexe et résulte de l'intégration, au niveau du cortex et du système limbique, de messages intéro- et nociceptifs. Par dyspnée «sine materia¼, nous entendons ici une dyspnée sans pathologie cardiorespiratoire ou métabolique sous-jacente avérée et nous y incluons celle du syndrome d'hyperventilation et du déconditionnement physique. La prise en charge de la dyspnée «sine materia¼ et, notamment, celle du syndrome d'hyperventilation repose sur la psychothérapie comportementale et la gestion du déconditionnement physique par des programmes de réathlétisation.