Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cancer ; 91(7): 1231-7, 2001 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11283921

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of breast carcinoma have led to a multidisciplinary approach to management for patients with breast carcinoma. To assess the effect of this approach, the authors performed an evaluation for a cohort of patients examined in a multidisciplinary breast cancer center. METHODS: An analysis was performed for the records of 75 consecutive women with 77 breast lesions examined in consultation in a multidisciplinary breast cancer center between January and June 1998. Each patient's case was evaluated by a panel consisting of a medical oncologist, surgical oncologist, radiation oncologist, pathologist, diagnostic radiologist, and, when indicated, plastic surgeon. A comprehensive history and physical examination was performed, and the relevant mammograms, pathology slides, and medical records were reviewed. Treatment recommendations made before this evaluation were compared with the consensus recommendations made by the panel. RESULTS: For the 75 patients, the multidisciplinary panel disagreed with the treatment recommendations from the outside physicians in 32 cases (43%), and agreed in 41 cases (55%). Two patients (3%) had no treatment recommendation before consultation. For the 32 patients with a disagreement, the treatment recommendations were breast-conservation treatment instead of mastectomy (n = 13; 41%) or reexcision (n = 2; 6%); further workup instead of immediate definitive treatment (n = 10; 31%); treatment based on major change in diagnosis on pathology review (n = 3; 9%); addition of postmastectomy radiation treatment (n = 3; 9%); or addition of hormonal therapy (n = 1; 3%). CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary breast cancer evaluation program provided an integrated program in which individual patients were evaluated by a team of physicians and led to a change in treatment recommendation for 43% (32 of 75) of the patients examined. This multidisciplinary program provided important second opinions for many patients with breast carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Cancer Care Facilities , Comprehensive Health Care , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Referral and Consultation
2.
Cancer Pract ; 1(1): 35-9, 1993.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8324528

ABSTRACT

The American Cancer Society (ACS), Philadelphia Division, through its Nurses' Education Committee (NEC), accepted the challenge to provide cancer prevention and early detection programs to several culturally diverse populations to directly reach the underserved, the working poor, and healthcare professionals who care for the poor. Populations selected included (1) students enrolled in nursing-assistant programs, (2) committed members of the ACS's NEC, (3) registered nurses employed by the local department of public health, and (4) a group of female immigrants from Russia.


Subject(s)
Health Education/organization & administration , Medically Underserved Area , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Poverty , Preventive Health Services/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Neoplasms/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...