Application of the New Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Surveillance Criteria for Ventilator-Associated Events to a Cohort of PICU Patients Identifies Different Patients Compared With the Previous Definition and Physician Diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the performance of the 2008 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Pediatric criteria for ventilator-associated pneumonia, the 2013 Adult Ventilator-Associated Condition criteria, the new Draft Pediatric Ventilator-Associated Condition criteria, and physician-diagnosed ventilator-associated pneumonia in a cohort of PICU patients. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a previously conducted prospective observational study. SETTING: PICU within a tertiary care children's hospital between April 1, 2010, and April 1, 2011. PATIENTS: Patients between 31 days and 18 years old, mechanically ventilated via endotracheal tube for more than 72 hours and no limitations of care. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ventilator-associated pneumonia criteria applied in real time and ventilator-associated condition criteria applied retrospectively. Outcomes assessed between cases and noncases within criteria. Of the 133 eligible participants, 24 (18%) had ventilator-associated pneumonia by 2008 Pediatric criteria and 27 (20%) by physician diagnosis. Sixteen (12%) and 10 (8%) had ventilator-associated condition by 2013 Adult and Draft Pediatric criteria, respectively. We found significant overlap between cases identified with 2008 Pediatric criteria and physician diagnosis (p = 0.549), but comparisons between the other definitions revealed that the newer criteria identify different patients than previous Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ventilator-associated pneumonia criteria and physician diagnosis (p < 0.01). Although 20 participants were diagnosed with ventilator-associated pneumonia by 2008 Pediatric criteria and physician diagnosis, only three participants were identified by all four criteria. Three subjects uniquely identified by the Draft Pediatric criteria were noninfectious in etiology. Cases identified by all criteria except Draft Pediatric had higher ratios of actual ICU length of stay to Pediatric Risk of Mortality III-adjusted expected length of stay compared with noncases. CONCLUSIONS: The Draft Pediatric criteria identify fewer and different patients than previous ventilator-associated pneumonia criteria or physician diagnosis, potentially missing patients with preventable harms, but also identified patients with potentially preventable noninfectious respiratory deteriorations. Further investigations are required to maximize the identification of patients with preventable harms from mechanical ventilation.

Racial/Ethnic Variation in Emergency Department Care for Children With Asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the variation between racial/ethnic groups in emergency department (ED) treatment of asthma for pediatric patients. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional analysis of pediatric (2-18 years) asthma visits among 6 EDs in the Upper Midwest between June 2011 and May 2012. We used mixed-effects logistic regression to assess the odds of receiving steroids, radiology tests, and returning to the ED within 30 days. We conducted a subanalysis of asthma visits where patients received at least 1 albuterol treatment in the ED. RESULTS: The sample included 2909 asthma visits by 1755 patients who were discharged home from the ED. After adjusting for demographics, insurance type, and triage score, African American (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.26) and Hispanic (aOR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.22-2.22) patients had higher odds of receiving steroids compared with whites. African Americans (aOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.74) also had lower odds of radiological testing compared with whites. Asians had the lowest odds of 30-day ED revisits (aOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.84), with no other significant differences detected between racial/ethnic groups. Subgroup analyses of asthma patients who received albuterol revealed similar results, with American Indians showing lower odds of radiological testing as well (aOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.22-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, children from racial/ethnic minority groups had higher odds of steroid administration and lower odds of radiological testing compared with white children. The underlying reasons for these differences are likely multifactorial, including varying levels of disease severity, health literacy, and access to care.

Leaving the emergency department without complete care: disparities in American Indian children.

BACKGROUND: Children who leave the emergency department (ED) without complete evaluation or care (LWCET) have poorer outcomes in general. Previous studies have found that American Indian (AI) children have higher rates of LWCET than other racial or ethnic groups. Therefore, this study aims to examine LWCET in AI children by exploring differences by ED location and utilization patterns. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of five EDs in the upper Midwest between June 2011 and May 2012. We included all visits by children aged 0-17 who identified as African American (AA), AI or White. Logistic regression was used to determine differences in LWCET by race and ED location controlling for other possible confounding factors including sex, age, insurance type, triage level, distance from ED, timing of visit, and ED activity level. RESULTS: LWCET occurred in 1.73% of 68,461 visits made by 47,228 children. The multivariate model revealed that AIs were more likely to LWCET compared to White children (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.62, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.30-2.03). There was no significant difference in LWCET between AA and White children. Other factors significantly associated with LWCET included triage level, distance from the ED, timing of visit, and ED activity level. CONCLUSION: Our results show that AI children have higher rates of LWCET compared to White children; this association is different from other racial minority groups. There are likely complex factors affecting LWCET in AI children throughout the upper Midwest, which necessitates further exploration.

Community Perspectives on Emergency Department Use and Care for American Indian Children.

Emergency department (ED) utilization by American Indian (AI) children is among the highest in the nation. Numerous health disparities have been well documented in AI children, but limited information is available on parental experiences of care for AI children in the ED. Our objective was to understand parental attitudes towards ED care for AI children. Focus groups were held with AI parents/caregivers at five sites in the Upper Midwest. Traditional content analysis was used to identify themes. A total of 70 parents participated in ten focus groups. Three main themes were identified: healthcare environment, access to care, and interaction with providers. Healthcare environment issues included availability of specialists, wait times, and child-friendly areas. Transportation and financial considerations were major topics in access to care. Issues in interaction with providers included discrimination, stereotyping, and trust. This is one of the first studies to assess parent perspectives on ED use for AI children. Obtaining parental perspectives on ED experiences is critical to improve patient care and provide important information for ED providers.