Multi-quadrant biopsy technique improves diagnostic ability in large heterogeneous renal masses. Abel EJ, Heckman JE, Hinshaw L, Best S, Lubner M, Jarrard DF, Downs TM, Nakada SY, Lee FT Jr, Huang W, Ziemlewicz T.J Urol. 2015 Oct;194(4):886-91. [Epub 2015 Mar 30]. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.106.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous biopsy obtained from a single location is prone to sampling error in large heterogeneous renal masses, leading to nondiagnostic results or failure to detect poor prognostic features. We evaluated the accuracy of percutaneous biopsy for large renal masses using a modified multi-quadrant technique vs. a standard biopsy technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and pathological data for all patients with cT2 or greater renal masses who underwent percutaneous biopsy from 2009 to 2014 were reviewed. The multi-quadrant technique was defined as multiple core biopsies from at least 4 separate solid enhancing areas in the tumor. The incidence of nondiagnostic findings, sarcomatoid features and procedural complications was recorded, and concordance between biopsy specimens and nephrectomy pathology was compared. RESULTS: A total of 122 biopsies were performed for 117 tumors in 116 patients (46 using the standard biopsy technique and 76 using the multi-quadrant technique). Median tumor size was 10cm (IQR: 8-12). Biopsy was nondiagnostic in 5 of 46 (10.9%) standard and 0 of 76 (0%) multi-quadrant biopsies (P = 0.007). Renal cell carcinoma was identified in 96 of 115 (82.0%) tumors and nonrenal cell carcinoma tumors were identified in 21 (18.0%). One complication occurred using the standard biopsy technique and no complications were reported using the multi-quadrant technique. Sarcomatoid features were present in 23 of 96 (23.9%) large renal cell carcinomas studied. Sensitivity for identifying sarcomatoid features was higher using the multi-quadrant technique compared to the standard biopsy technique at 13 of 15 (86.7%) vs. 2 of 8 (25.0%) (P = 0.0062). CONCLUSIONS: The multi-quadrant percutaneous biopsy technique increases the ability to identify aggressive pathological features in large renal tumors and decreases nondiagnostic biopsy rates.

Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using the sagittal reconstruction from routine abdominal CT for combined assessment of vertebral fractures and density.

SUMMARY: Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using abdominal CT scans obtained for other purposes has the potential to increase detection of those at increased risk for fragility fractures. We sought to combine the tasks of density measurement and vertebral fracture assessment on the sagittal view. We confirm that this represents a robust approach and recommend its implementation in clinical practice. INTRODUCTION: Opportunistic osteoporosis screening at routine abdominal CT has been proposed by measuring axial (transverse) L1 trabecular attenuation and by sagittal reconstruction for vertebral fracture assessment. We sought to combine this dual evaluation on the sagittal reconstruction alone to improve efficiency. METHODS: Routine contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans performed for any indication on 571 consecutive adults age 60 years or older (mean age 70.7 years) were retrospectively analyzed. These were performed at a single center over a 3-month period. L1 trabecular attenuation was measured using an ovoid region-of-interest on both the transverse and sagittal series. The sagittal reconstruction was also analyzed for moderate-to-severe vertebral compression fractures using the Genant visual semi-quantitative method. Likely osteoporosis was defined by a moderate-to-severe fracture and/or sagittal L1 trabecular attenuation of ≤110 Hounsfield units (HU) (previously found to be >90% specific for osteoporosis on our calibrated GE CT scanners at 120 kV(p)). Correlation was made with hip and spine dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). RESULTS: Mean absolute difference in L1 trabecular attenuation between transverse and sagittal reconstructions was 6.7 HU (±5.7) or 6.2%. The transverse and sagittal HU measurements were in agreement (i.e., both measurements above or below this threshold) in 94.5% of cases at the 110-HU cutoff. A total of 243 (42.3%) patients had likely osteoporosis by CT criteria, of which only 48 (19.8%) had previous DXA screening. CONCLUSION: Assessment of the sagittal view alone at routine abdominal CT for both vertebral fractures and trabecular bone mineral density provides a rapid and effective opportunistic screen for detecting individuals at increased risk for fragility fractures.