Chemotaxis assays for eukaryotic cells.

Chemotaxis is a complex response of a cell to an external stimulus. It involves detecting and measuring the concentration of the chemoattractant, biochemical transmission of the information, and the motility and adhesive changes associated with the response. This unit describes a number of chemotaxis assays that can be used to identify chemoattractants individually and in large-scale screenings, to distinguish chemotaxis from chemokinesis, and to analyze cellular behavioral and biochemical responses. Some of these assays such as the filter, under agarose, and small population assays, can be used to monitor the behavior of large groups of cells; the bridge, pipet, and upshift assays can be used to analyze the responses of single cells.

Profilin enhances Cdc42-induced nucleation of actin polymerization.

We find that profilin contributes in several ways to Cdc42-induced nucleation of actin filaments in high speed supernatant of lysed neutrophils. Depletion of profilin inhibited Cdc42-induced nucleation; re-addition of profilin restored much of the activity. Mutant profilins with a decreased affinity for either actin or poly-l-proline were less effective at restoring activity. Whereas Cdc42 must activate Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome protein (WASP) to stimulate nucleation by the Arp2/3 complex, VCA (verpolin homology, cofilin, and acidic domain contained in the COOH-terminal fragment of N-WASP) constitutively activates the Arp2/3 complex. Nucleation by VCA was not inhibited by profilin depletion. With purified N-WASP and Arp2/3 complex, Cdc42-induced nucleation did not require profilin but was enhanced by profilin, wild-type profilin being more effective than mutant profilin with reduced affinity for poly-l-proline. Nucleation by the Arp2/3 complex is a function of the free G-actin concentration. Thus, when profilin addition decreased the free G-actin concentration, it inhibited Cdc42- and VCA-induced nucleation. However, when profilin was added with G-actin in a ratio that maintained the initial free G-actin concentration, it increased the rate of both Cdc42- and VCA-induced nucleation. This enhancement, also seen with purified proteins, was greatest when the free G-actin concentration was low. These data suggest that under conditions present in intact cells, profilin enhances nucleation by activated Arp2/3 complex.

Cdc42-induced actin filaments are protected from capping protein.

Each actin filament has a pointed and a barbed end, however, filament elongation occurs primarily at the barbed end. Capping proteins, by binding to the barbed end, can terminate this elongation. The rate of capping depends on the concentration of capping protein [1], and thus, if capping terminates elongation, the length of filaments should vary inversely with the concentration of capping protein. In cell extracts, such as those derived from neutrophils, new actin filaments can be nucleated by addition of GTPgammaS-activated Cdc42 (a small GTPase of the Rho family). To determine whether elongation of these filaments is terminated by capping, we manipulated the concentration of capping protein, the major calcium-independent capping protein in neutrophils, and observed the effects on filament lengths. Depletion of 70% of the capping protein from extracts increased the mean length of filaments elongated from spectrin-actin seeds (very short actin filaments with free barbed ends) but did not increase the mean length of filaments induced by Cdc42. Furthermore, doubling the concentration of capping protein in cell extracts by adding pure capping protein did not decrease the mean length of filaments induced by Cdc42. These results suggest that the barbed ends of Cdc42-induced filaments are protected from capping by capping protein.

The platelet cytoskeleton regulates the affinity of the integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3) for fibrinogen.

Agonist-generated inside-out signals enable the platelet integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3) to bind soluble ligands such as fibrinogen. We found that inhibiting actin polymerization in unstimulated platelets with cytochalasin D or latrunculin A mimics the effects of platelet agonists by inducing fibrinogen binding to alpha(IIb)beta(3). By contrast, stabilizing actin filaments with jasplakinolide prevented cytochalasin D-, latrunculin A-, and ADP-induced fibrinogen binding. Cytochalasin D- and latrunculin A-induced fibrinogen was inhibited by ADP scavengers, suggesting that subthreshold concentrations of ADP provided the stimulus for the actin filament turnover required to see cytochalasin D and latrunculin A effects. Gelsolin, which severs actin filaments, is activated by calcium, whereas the actin disassembly factor cofilin is inhibited by serine phosphorylation. Consistent with a role for these factors in regulating alpha(IIb)beta(3) function, cytochalasin D- and latrunculin A-induced fibrinogen binding was inhibited by the intracellular calcium chelators 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N', N'-tetraacetic acid acetoxymethyl ester and EGTA acetoxymethyl ester and the Ser/Thr phosphatase inhibitors okadaic acid and calyculin A. Our results suggest that the actin cytoskeleton in unstimulated platelets constrains alpha(IIb)beta(3) in a low affinity state. We propose that agonist-stimulated increases in platelet cytosolic calcium initiate actin filament turnover. Increased actin filament turnover then relieves cytoskeletal constraints on alpha(IIb)beta(3), allowing it to assume the high affinity conformation required for soluble ligand binding.

Actin polymerization: Where the WASP stings.

How do extracellular signals induce actin polymerization, as required for many cellular responses? Key signal transducers, such as the small GTPases Cdc42 and Rac, have now been shown to link via proteins of the WASP family to the Arp2/3 complex, which nucleates actin polymerization.

Actin cytoskeleton: the Arp2/3 complex gets to the point.

Actin filament polymerization results primarily from the addition of monomers to pre-existing filaments. Recent studies have revealed that the Arp2/3 protein complex, which includes two actin-related proteins, can nucleate new actin filaments, and this capacity can be enhanced by ActA, a protein used by Listeria to polymerize actin.

Mechanism of Cdc42-induced actin polymerization in neutrophil extracts.

Cdc42, activated with GTPgammaS, induces actin polymerization in supernatants of lysed neutrophils. This polymerization, like that induced by agonists, requires elongation at filament barbed ends. To determine if creation of free barbed ends was sufficient to induce actin polymerization, free barbed ends in the form of spectrin-actin seeds or sheared F-actin filaments were added to cell supernatants. Neither induced polymerization. Furthermore, the presence of spectrin-actin seeds did not increase the rate of Cdc42-induced polymerization, suggesting that the presence of Cdc42 did not facilitate polymerization from spectrin-actin seeds such as might have been the case if Cdc42 inhibited capping or released G-actin from a sequestered pool. Electron microscopy revealed that Cdc42-induced filaments elongated rapidly, achieving a mean length greater than 1 micron in 15 s. The mean length of filaments formed from spectrin-actin seeds was <0.4 micron. Had spectrin-actin seeds elongated at comparable rates before they were capped, they would have induced longer filaments. There was little change in mean length of Cdc42-induced filaments between 15 s and 5 min, suggesting that the increase in F-actin over this time was due to an increase in filament number. These data suggest that Cdc42 induction of actin polymerization requires both creation of free barbed ends and facilitated elongation at these ends.

Regulation of actin polymerization in cell-free systems by GTPgammaS and Cdc42.

We have established a cell-free system to investigate pathways that regulate actin polymerization. Addition of GTPgammaS to lysates of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) or Dictyostelium discoideum amoeba induced formation of filamentous actin. The GTPgammaS appeared to act via a small G-protein, since it was active in lysates ofD. discoideum mutants missing either the alpha2- or beta-subunit of the heterotrimeric G-protein required for chemoattractant-induced actin polymerization in living cells. Furthermore, recombinant Cdc42, but not Rho or Rac, induced polymerization in the cell-free system. The Cdc42-induced increase in filamentous actin required GTPgammaS binding and was inhibited by a fragment of the enzyme PAK1 that binds Cdc42. In a high speed supernatant, GTPgammaS alone was ineffective, but GTPgammaS-loaded Cdc42 induced actin polymerization, suggesting that the response was limited by guanine nucleotide exchange. Stimulating exchange by chelating magnesium, by adding acidic phospholipids, or by adding the exchange factors Cdc24 or Dbl restored the ability of GTPgammaS to induce polymerization. The stimulation of actin polymerization did not correlate with PIP2 synthesis.

Signal transduction and actin filament organization.

Small GTP-binding proteins of the Rho family appear to integrate extracellular signals from diverse receptor types and initiate rearrangements of F-actin. Active members of the Rho family, Rho and Rac, are now joined by Cdc42 which induces filopodia. Downstream of the Rho family proteins, actin polymerization may be induced by an increase in the availability of actin filament barbed ends. Actin organization may be affected by exposure of actin-binding sites on proteins such as vinculin and ezrin.

Actin filament barbed-end capping activity in neutrophil lysates: the role of capping protein-beta 2.

A barbed-end capping activity was found in high speed supernates of neutrophils lysed in submicromolar calcium. In dilute supernate (> or = 100-fold dilution of cytoplasm), this activity accounted for most of the inhibition of barbed-end elongation of pyrenyl-G-actin from spectrin-F-actin seeds. Pointed-end elongation from gelsolin-capped F-actin seeds was not inhibited at comparable concentrations of supernate, thus excluding actin monomer sequestration as a cause of the observed inhibition. Most of the capping activity was due to capping protein-beta 2 (a homologue of cap Z). Thus, while immunoadsorption of > or = 95% of the gelsolin in the supernate did not decrease capping activity, immunoadsorption of capping protein-beta 2 reduced capping activity proportionally to the amount of capping protein-beta 2 adsorbed. Depletion of > 90% of capping protein-beta 2 from the supernate removed 90% of its capping activity. The functional properties of the capping activity were defined. The dissociation constant for binding to barbed ends (determined by steady state and kinetic analyses) was approximately 1-2 nM; the on-rate of capping was between 7 x 10(5) and 5 x 10(6) M-1 s-1; and the off-rate was approximately 2 x 10(-3) s-1. The concentration of capper free in the intact cell (determined by adsorption of supernate with spectrin-actin seeds) was estimated to be approximately 1-2 microM. Thus, there appeared to be enough high affinity capper to cap all the barbed ends in vivo. Nevertheless, immediately after lysis with detergent, neutrophils contained sites that nucleate barbed-end elongation of pyrenyl-G-actin. These barbed ends subsequently become capped with a time course and concentration dependence similar to that of spectrin-F-actin seeds in high speed supernates. These observations suggest that, despite the excess of high affinity capper, some ends either are not capped in vivo or are transiently uncapped upon lysis and dilution.

Actin polymerization induced by GTP gamma S in permeabilized neutrophils is induced and maintained by free barbed ends.

To address the mechanisms through which agonists stimulate actin polymerization, we examined the roles of monomer sequestering proteins and free barbed ends on actin polymerization induced by guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTP gamma S) in neutrophils permeabilized with streptolysin O. Addition of profilin (without GTP gamma S) caused a net decrease in F-actin. Thus, merely making profilin available in the cell was not sufficient to induce actin polymerization. On the other hand, addition of profilin hardly affected the polymerization induced by GTP gamma S, while thymosin beta 4 or DNase I decreased this polymerization. These data suggested that GTP gamma S induced polymerization by increasing the availability of barbed ends. In the presence of cytochalasin B, profilin did inhibit polymerization induced by GTP gamma S, demonstrating that GTP gamma S did not inhibit profilin's monomer sequestering ability. The F-actin induced by GTP gamma S was not limited by a time-dependent loss of G-actin or G-proteins from permeabilized cells since, following stimulation with suboptimal concentrations of GTP gamma S, addition of more GTP gamma S induced further polymerization. Barbed ends remained free after F-actin reached plateau since (a) cytochalasin B caused depolymerization of induced F-actin and (b) profilin did not depolymerize induced F-actin unless the cells were first treated with cytochalasin to cap barbed ends. The data indicate that GTP gamma S maintains an increased level of F-actin by keeping at least a few barbed ends available for polymerization.

Induction of actin polymerization in permeabilized neutrophils. Role of ATP.

We have used streptolysin-O (SO)-permeabilized neutrophils to investigate the signal transduction pathway through which chemoattractants induce actin polymerization. Chemoattractants stimulate phosphorylation of various proteins and lipids but whether these phosphorylations are required for actin polymerization is not known. Addition of guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTP gamma S) to SO-permeabilized neutrophils induced a doubling of the F-actin. This induction of F-actin, assayed by TRITC-labeled phalloidin binding, did not require the addition of ATP. Neither addition of apyrase to deplete residual ATP nor addition of ADP or UDP to compete with residual endogenous ATP inhibited significantly the GTP gamma S-induced polymerization. Addition of ATP on its own caused no increase in F-actin and did not affect the time course or concentration dependence of GTP gamma S-induced F-actin. Addition of ATP did increase the maximal amount of F-actin induced by GTP gamma S by about 20%. N-Formylnorleucylleucylphenalanine (formyl-peptide) in the presence of GTP, but not in its absence, also stimulated an increase in F-actin in SO-permeabilized cells. The F-actin induced by formyl-peptide plus GTP was inhibited by pertussis toxin. The induction did not require addition of ATP and addition of ADP to compete with residual ATP only slightly decreased the level of actin. However, addition of UDP significantly reduced the response to formyl-peptide plus GTP. Addition of ATP enhanced the increase in F-actin induced by optimal concentrations of GTP with formyl-peptide. ATP also lowered the apparent Km for GTP, but not for N-formyl peptide. The non-hydrolyzable ATP analog, adenosine 5'-(beta, gamma-imino)triphosphate, did not enhance the actin polymerization. Rather its presence inhibited the response induced by formyl-peptide plus GTP. The data suggest that actin polymerization can be induced by GTP gamma S in an manner that is largely ATP-independent. A role for ATP cannot be ruled out in the induction of actin polymerization by formyl-peptide plus GTP.

Distribution of F-actin elongation sites in lysed polymorphonuclear leukocytes parallels the distribution of endogenous F-actin.

We compared, on lysed polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs), the spatial distributions of sites that nucleate actin polymerization with the spatial distribution of endogenous F-actin. Sites nucleating polymerization of exogenous actin were detected by incubating lysed cells with rhodamine-labeled G-actin under polymerizing conditions. Endogenous F-actin was stabilized and stained by lysis of cells into fluorescein-labeled (FITC) phalloidin. We found the distributions of rhodamine and fluorescein intensities in a given cell, resting or stimulated with chemoattractant, to be similar. Thus, after lysis the number of sites able to nucleate actin polymerization is proportional to the local F-actin concentration. Quantitative fluorescence microscopic analysis also demonstrated that (1) if cells were stimulated with chemoattractant shortly before lysis, the total fluorescence per cell of both fluorophores went up; (2) if peptide was diluted shortly before lysis, the endogenous F-actin in the lamellae was dramatically reduced, but nucleation sites persisted, giving a high rhodamine to fluorescein ratio; and (3) there was a small increase in the ratio of rhodamine (exogenously grown actin) to fluorescein (endogenous F-actin) in a region near the lamellar/endoplasm border, centripetal to regions of the highest concentration of endogenous F-actin. The rhodamine signal appeared to be due to in situ actin polymerization probably nucleated by existing free barbed ends, since (1) the rhodamine signal increased linearly with time with no detectable lag if the actin concentration was above that of the critical concentration of the barbed end; (2) the rhodamine signal was dramatically reduced if lysates were incubated with gelsolin-actin complex (which stably caps barbed ends), then washed before the rhodamine G-actin was added; and (3) the number of nucleation sites at the time of lysis is similar to the number of the barbed ends of actin filaments determined by the kinetics of depolymerization [Cano et al., 1991]. The fact that the distribution of exogenous actin polymerization paralleled the endogenous F-actin suggests that the number of free barbed ends per F-actin is roughly constant. If all filament ends were free, or if a constant fraction of the filaments ends were free, these data would suggest that the mean filament length is roughly constant throughout the cell.

Recent quantitative studies of actin filament turnover during cell locomotion.

Cell locomotion depends on polymerization and depolymerization of filamentous actin. Net polymerization at the cell front occurs fast enough to fill the extending lamellipod, and since total F-actin is essentially constant over time, depolymerization must equal polymerization. Indeed, the fastest moving cell types have the highest rates of depolymerization. Accounting for the high rate of depolymerization raises several problems. One is that net depolymerization requires the concentration of G-actin to be low (below the critical concentration), but rapid polymerization (occurring < 1 micron away) requires the concentration of G-actin to be high (well above the critical concentration). This may be accomplished by spatial compartmentalization of factors that favor polymerization or depolymerization, and/or by proteins that bind G-actin and prevent spontaneous polymerization while allowing barbed-end elongation. A second problem is that depolymerization proceeds faster than would seem possible from studies of F-actin in vitro (as calculated from number and lengths of filaments present and in vitro rate constants). Rapid depolymerization may be accomplished by filament cutters or by cytoplasmic components (as yet undiscovered) that increase the rate of depolymerization.

Thymosin beta 4 sequesters the majority of G-actin in resting human polymorphonuclear leukocytes.

Thymosin beta 4 (T beta 4), a 5-kD peptide which binds G-actin and inhibits its polymerization (Safer, D., M. Elzinga, and V. T. Nachmias. 1991. J. Biol. Chem. 266:4029-4032), appears to be the major G-actin sequestering protein in human PMNs. In support of a previous study by Hannappel, E., and M. Van Kampen (1987. J. Chromatography. 397:279-285), we find that T beta 4 is an abundant peptide in these cells. By reverse phase HPLC of perchloric acid supernatants, human PMNs contain approximately 169 fg/cell +/- 90 fg/cell (SD), corresponding to a cytoplasmic concentration of approximately 149 +/- 80.5 microM. On non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels, a large fraction of G-actin in supernatants prepared from resting PMNs has a mobility similar to the G-actin/T beta 4 complex. Chemoattractant stimulation of PMNs results in a decrease in this G-actin/T beta 4 complex. To determine whether chemoattractant induced actin polymerization results from an inactivation of T beta 4, the G-actin sequestering activity of supernatants prepared from resting and chemoattractant stimulated cells was measured by comparing the rates of pyrenyl-actin polymerization from filament pointed ends. Pyrenyl actin polymerization was inhibited to a greater extent in supernatants from stimulated cells and these results are qualitatively consistent with T beta 4 being released as G-actin polymerizes, with no chemoattractant-induced change in its affinity for G-actin. The kinetics of bovine spleen T beta 4 binding to muscle pyrenyl G-actin are sufficiently rapid to accommodate the rapid changes in actin polymerization and depolymerization observed in vivo in response to chemoattractant addition and removal.

Inhibition of actin filament depolymerization by the Dictyostelium 30,000-D actin-bundling protein.

We have studied the effect of the Dictyostelium discoideum 30,000-D actin-bundling protein on the assembly and disassembly of pyrenyl-labeled actin in vitro. The results indicate that the protein is a potent inhibitor of the rate of actin depolymerization. The inhibition is rapid, dose dependent, and is observed at both ends of the filament. There is little effect of 30-kD protein on the initial rate of elongation from F-actin seeds or on the spontaneous nucleation of actin polymerization. We could detect little or no effect on the critical concentration. The novel feature of these results is that the filament ends are free for assembly but are significantly impaired in disassembly with little change in the critical concentration at steady state. The effects appear to be largely independent of the cross-linking of actin filaments by the 30-kD protein. Actin cross-linking proteins may not only cross-link actin filaments, but may also differentially protect filaments in cells from disassembly and promote the formation of localized filament arrays with enhanced stability.