A simple deep breathing test reveals altered cerebral autoregulation in type 2 diabetic patients.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Patients with diabetes mellitus have an increased risk of stroke and other cerebrovascular complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the autoregulation of cerebral blood flow in diabetic patients using a simple method that could easily be applied to the clinical routine screening of diabetic patients. METHODS: We studied ten patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 11 healthy volunteer control participants. Continuous and non-invasive measurements of blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity were performed during deep breathing at 0.1 Hz (six breaths per minute). Cerebral autoregulation was assessed from the phase shift angle between breathing-induced 0.1 Hz oscillations in mean blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity. RESULTS: The controls and patients all showed positive phase shift angles between breathing-induced 0.1 Hz blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity oscillations. However, the phase shift angle was significantly reduced (p < 0.05) in the patients (48 +/- 9 degrees ) compared with the controls (80 +/- 12 degrees ). The gain between 0.1 Hz oscillations in blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity did not differ significantly between the patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The reduced phase shift angle between oscillations in mean blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity during deep breathing suggests altered cerebral autoregulation in patients with diabetes and might contribute to an increased risk of cerebrovascular disorders.

Altered cerebral regulation in type 2 diabetic patients with cardiac autonomic neuropathy.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Assessment of cerebral regulation in diabetic patients is often problematic because of the presence of cardiac autonomic neuropathy. We evaluated the technique of oscillatory neck suction at 0.1 Hz to quantify cerebral regulation in diabetic patients and healthy control subjects. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In nine type 2 diabetic patients with cardiac autonomic neuropathy and 11 age-matched controls, we measured blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity responses to application of 0.1 Hz neck suction. We determined spectral powers and calculated the transfer function gain and phase shift between 0.1 Hz blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity oscillations as parameters of cerebral regulation. RESULTS: In the patients and control subjects, neck suction did not significantly influence mean values of the RR interval, blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity. The powers of 0.1 Hz blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity oscillations increased in the control subjects, but remained stable in the patients. Transfer function gain remained stable in both groups. Phase shift decreased in the patients, but remained stable in control subjects. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The absence of an increase in the power of 0.1 Hz blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity oscillations confirmed autonomic neuropathy in the diabetic patients. Gain analysis did not show altered cerebral regulation. The decrease in phase shift in the patients indicates a more passive transmission of neck suction-induced blood pressure fluctuations onto the cerebrovascular circulation, i.e. altered cerebral regulation, in the patients, and is therefore suited to identifying subtle impairment of cerebral regulation in these patients.

Impaired cardiovagal and vasomotor responses to baroreceptor stimulation in type II diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: In diabetic patients, impairment of the cardiovagal limb of the baroreflex has been well established. However, the role of sympathetic mediated baroreflex vasomotor control of the blood vessels is not well defined. We therefore assessed the vasomotor responses to sinusoidal baroreceptor stimulation in diabetic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 14 type II diabetic patients (age; 57 +/- 7 years) and 18 healthy controls (age; 59 +/- 11 years). Oscillatory neck suction was applied at 0.1 Hz to assess the sympathetic modulation of the heart and blood vessels, and at 0.2 Hz to assess the effect of parasympathetic stimulation on the heart. Breathing was paced at 0.25 Hz. Spectral analysis was used to evaluate the oscillatory responses of RR-interval and blood pressure. RESULTS: The diabetic patients showed a significantly lower RR-interval response (P < 0.05) to the 0.1 Hz neck suction (2.52 +/- 0.50-3.62 +/- 0.54 ln ms2) than the controls (4.23 +/- 0.31-6.74 +/- 0.36 ln ms2). The increase in power of 0.1 Hz systolic blood pressure oscillations during 0.1 Hz suction was also significantly smaller (P < 0.05) in the diabetics (1.17 +/- 0.44-1.69 +/- 0.44 mmHg2) than in the controls (1.60 +/- 0.29 mmHg2-5.87 +/- 1.25 mmHg2). The magnitude of the peak of the 0.2 Hz oscillation in the RR-interval in response to 0.2 Hz neck stimulation was significantly greater (P < 0.05) in the controls (3.42 +/- 0.46 ln ms2) than in the diabetics (1.58 +/- 0.44 ln ms2). CONCLUSION: In addition to cardiovagal dysfunction, baroreflex-mediated sympathetic modulation of the blood vessels is impaired in type II diabetic patients.