Comparison of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL and Insulin Degludec 100 U/mL Around Spontaneous Exercise Sessions in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial (ULTRAFLEXI-1 Study).

Aims: In the ULTRAFLEXI-1 study, we compared basal insulin Glargine 300 U/mL (IGlar U300) and insulin Degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg U100) for time below range <70 mg/dL (TBR<70; 3.9 mmol/L) in two different doses (100% and 75% of the regular dose) when used around spontaneous exercise sessions in adults with type 1 diabetes. Methods: A randomized, single-center, four-period, cross-over trial was performed and in each of the four 2-weeks-periods, participants attended six spontaneous 60 min moderate-intensity evening cycle ergometer exercise sessions. The basal insulin administered on the exercise days were IGlar U300 100% or 75% of the regular dose or IDeg U100 100% or 75%, respectively (morning injection). The primary outcome was the TBR<70 during the 24 h postexercise periods of the six spontaneous exercise sessions in the four trial arms and was analyzed in hierarchical order using the repeated measures linear mixed model. Results: Twenty-five people with type 1 diabetes were enrolled (14 males) with a mean age of 41.4 ± 11.9 years and an HbA1c of 7.5% ± 0.8% (59 ± 9 mmol/mol). The mean ± standard error of mean TBR<70 during the 24 h periods following the exercise sessions was 2.71% ± 0.51% for IGlar U300 (100%) and 4.37% ± 0.69% for IDeg U100 (100%) (P = 0.023) as well as 2.28% ± 0.53% for IGlar U300 and 2.55% ± 0.58% for IDeg U100 when using a 75% dose on exercise days (P = 0.720). Time in glucose range70-180 was the highest in the IDeg U100 (100%) group. Conclusions: TBR<70 within the first 24 h after spontaneous exercise sessions was significantly lower when receiving IGlar U300 compared to IDeg U100 when a regular basal dose was administered.

Performance of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring systems in people with type 1 diabetes: A pooled analysis.

AIMS: To conduct a pooled analysis to assess the performance of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) in association with the rate of change in sensor glucose in a cohort of children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this pooled analysis, isCGM system accuracy was assessed depending on the rate of change in sensor glucose. Clinical studies that have been investigating isCGM accuracy against blood glucose, accompanied with collection time points were included in this analysis. isCGM performance was assessed by means of median absolute relative difference (MedARD), Parkes error grid (PEG) and Bland-Altman plot analyses. RESULTS: Twelve studies comprising 311 participants were included, with a total of 15 837 paired measurements. The overall MedARD (interquartile range) was 12.7% (5.9-23.5) and MedARD differed significantly based on the rate of change in glucose (P < 0.001). An absolute difference of -22 mg/dL (-1.2 mmol/L) (95% limits of agreement [LoA] 60 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L), -103 mg/dL (-5.7 mmol/L)) was found when glucose was rapidly increasing (isCGM glucose minus reference blood glucose), while a -32 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) (95% LoA 116 mg/dL (6.4 mmol/L), -51 mg/dL (-2.8 mmol/L)) absolute difference was observed in periods of rapidly decreasing glucose. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of isCGM was good when compared to reference blood glucose measurements. The rate of change in glucose for both increasing and decreasing glucose levels diminished isCGM performance, showing lower accuracy during high rates of glucose change.

Efficient and safe glycaemic control with basal-bolus insulin therapy during fasting periods in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes using decision support technology: A post hoc analysis.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of basal-bolus insulin therapy in managing glycaemia during fasting periods in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of two prospective, uncontrolled interventional trials that applied electronic decision support system-guided basal-bolus (meal-related and correction) insulin therapy. We searched for fasting periods (invasive or diagnostic procedures, medical condition) during inpatient stays. In a mixed model analysis, patients' glucose levels and insulin doses on days with regular food intake were compared with days with fasting periods. RESULTS: Out of 249 patients, 115 patients (33.9% female, age 68.3 ± 10.3 years, diabetes duration 15.1 ± 10.9 years, body mass index 30.1 ± 5.4 kg/m2 , HbA1c 69 ± 20 mmol/mol) had 194 days with fasting periods. Mean daily blood glucose (BG) was lower (modelled difference [ModDiff]: -0.5 ± 0.2 mmol/L, P = .006), and the proportion of glucose values within the target range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) increased on days with fasting periods compared with days with regular food intake (ModDiff: +0.06 ± 0.02, P = .005). Glycaemic control on fasting days was driven by a reduction in daily bolus insulin doses (ModDiff: -11.0 ± 0.9 IU, P < .001), while basal insulin was similar (ModDiff: -1.1 ± 0.6 IU, P = .082) compared with non-fasting days. Regarding hypoglycaemic events (BG < 3.9 mmol/L), there was no difference between fasting and non-fasting days (χ2 0.9% vs. 1.7%, P = .174). CONCLUSIONS: When using well-titrated basal-bolus insulin therapy in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, the basal insulin dose does not require adjustment during fasting periods to achieve safe glycaemic control, provided meal-related bolus insulin is omitted and correction bolus insulin is tailored to glucose levels.

Performance of three different continuous glucose monitoring systems in children with type 1 diabetes during a diabetes summer camp.

The aim of this study was to assess accuracy of the three most commonly used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems in almost real-life situation during a diabetes camp in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) aged 9-14 years. Data was gathered during a 2-week summer camp under physicians' supervision. Out of 38 participating children with T1D (aged: 11.0 [9.9; 12.1] years; 57% girls, mean HbA1c 7.2 [6.9; 7.7] %,) 37 wore a CGM system (either Abbott FreeStyle Libre (FSL), Dexcom G6 (DEX) or Medtronic Enlite (ENL)) throughout the camp. All concomitantly available data pairs of capillary glucose measurements and sensor values were used for the analysis. Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was calculated and Parkes Error Grid analyses were done for all three systems used. In total 2079 data pairs were available for analysis. The overall MARDs of CGM systems used at the camp was FSL: 13.3% (6.7;21.6). DEX: 10.3% (5.8; 16.7) and ENL 8.5% (3.6; 15.6). During eu-, hypo- and hyperglycemia MARDs were lowest in ENL. Highest MARDs were seen in hypoglycemia, where all three systems exhibited MARDs above 15%. Overnight MARDs of all systems was higher than during daytime. All sensors performed worst in hypoglycemia. Performance of the adequately calibrated Medtronic system outperformed the factory-calibrated sensors. For clinical practice, it is important to adequately train children with T1D and families in the correct procedures for sensors that require calibrations.

Safely finishing a half marathon by an adult with type 1 diabetes using a commercially available hybrid closed-loop system.

Glycemic targets are often difficult to achieve in people with type 1 diabetes, especially during exercise. Consequently, many people with type 1 diabetes avoid sports as a result of fear of hypoglycemia. Strenuous physical activity, such as a half marathon, imposes difficulties on people with type 1 diabetes. The first commercial hybrid closed-loop (HCL) system with the potential to facilitate better diabetes management during exercise has recently been marketed. So far, no data on HCL performance during strenuous exercise have been published. A woman with well-controlled type 1 diabetes participated in and safely finished a half marathon while undergoing HCL therapy. HCL could safely establish glycemic control without causing either hypo- or relevant hyperglycemia, and without the need for rescue carbohydrates while running. In the days after the half marathon, there was no change in glycemic control compared with the period before.

Improved glycaemic variability and basal insulin dose reduction during a running competition in recreationally active adults with type 1 diabetes-A single-centre, prospective, controlled observational study.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the glycaemic response, macronutrient intake and insulin management in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) compared to healthy individuals around a running competition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a single-centre, prospective, controlled observational study performed in individuals with T1D and healthy people. 24 people (12 T1D) were included in this study (age: T1D 41±12 vs. healthy 38±6 years, females: 3 vs. 6, BMI: 25.53.0 vs. 22.9±2.8 kg/m2). Both groups received an intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM; FreeStyle Libre 1, Abbott, USA) system to assess glycaemia 24 hours before, during and 24 hours after a running competition. During this period, participants recorded their food intake and insulin administration. Data were analysed via ANOVA and mixed model analyses with post-hoc testing (p≤0.05). RESULTS: For overall glycaemic ranges in comparison of groups, significant differences were found for time in range (T1D 63±21% vs. healthy 89±13%, p = 0.001), time above range (TAR) 1 (T1D 21±15% vs. healthy 0±0%, p<0.001) and TAR 2 (T1D 8 [0-16%] vs. healthy 0±0%, p<0.001). When glycaemic variability was assessed, people with T1D had a higher glycaemic variability compared to healthy individuals (p<0.0001). Basal insulin dose was significantly reduced when compared against the regular pre-study basal insulin dose (pre-study 22±6 vs. pre-competition day 11±9 (-50±41%), p = 0.02; competition day 15±5 (-32± 1%)). CONCLUSION: People with T1D have impaired glucose responses around a running competition compared to healthy individuals. However, basal insulin dose reductions were sufficient to prevent further dysglycaemia. CLINICAL TRIAL ID: drks.de; DRKS00019886.

Accuracy and stability of an arterial sensor for glucose monitoring in a porcine model using glucose clamp technique.

Intravascular glucose sensors have the potential to improve and facilitate glycemic control in critically ill patients and might overcome measurement delay and accuracy issues. This study investigated the accuracy and stability of a biosensor for arterial glucose monitoring tested in a hypo- and hyperglycemic clamp experiment in pigs. 12 sensors were tested over 5 consecutive days in 6 different pigs. Samples of sensor and reference measurement pairs were obtained every 15 minutes. 1337 pairs of glucose values (range 37-458 mg/dl) were available for analysis. The systems met ISO 15197:2013 criteria in 99.2% in total, 100% for glucose <100 mg/dl (n = 414) and 98.8% for glucose ≥100 mg/dl (n = 923). The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) during the entire glycemic range of all sensors was 4.3%. The MARDs within the hypoglycemic (<70 mg/dl), euglycemic (≥70-180 mg/dl) and hyperglycemic glucose ranges (≥180 mg/dl) were 6.1%, 3.6% and 4.7%, respectively. Sensors indicated comparable performance on all days investigated (day 1, 3 and 5). None of the systems showed premature failures. In a porcine model, the performance of the biosensor revealed a promising performance. The transfer of these results into a human setting is the logical next step.