Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Acad Med ; 93(5): 769-774, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29280754

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Expectations of certainty and confidence in surgical culture are a source of internal conflict for surgeons and learners, with surgeons describing a pressure to project an image that is, at times, inconsistent with how they feel internally. The authors explored surgical residents' perceptions of "impression management" and its effects on surgical judgment and decision making. METHOD: The authors used a constructivist grounded theory approach to conduct and analyze 15 semistructured interviews with general surgery trainees at an urban Canadian academic health center between 2012 and 2014. Interviews explored impression management in the context of resident learning and performance. Analysis was inductive, whereby emergent themes contributed to a developing conceptual framework, and deductive, using an existing theory of impression management. RESULTS: Residents described sensing an "expectation" to portray an image aligned with the ideal surgical stereotype of confidence and certainty, and shared strategies used to mirror this image. Impression management strategies were used to portray an image of competence, with the aim to improve access to teaching and evaluations. Unintended consequences of impression management on decision making, patient safety, and resident wellness were identified. CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the potential impact of the sociocultural context on residency training, and provide a language allowing for more explicit discussions about the impact of surgical culture on trainee behaviors. Translation includes formal instruction of these concepts in the curriculum so that trainees better recognize, reflect on, and cope with the pressures to perform in front of others.


Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making , Internship and Residency , Surgeons/psychology , Adult , Canada , Career Mobility , Female , Grounded Theory , Humans , Judgment , Male , Middle Aged , Self Efficacy , Surgeons/education
2.
Ann Surg ; 262(2): 253-9, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26114599

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore how risk is perceived and experienced by the surgeon and how risk is actively managed in individual practice. BACKGROUND: Risk in surgery has been examined from system-wide and personality perspectives. Although these are important, little is known about the perspective of the individual surgeon. METHODS: A constructivist grounded theory study was conducted to explore surgeons' perspectives on risk in the context of their personal "Comfort Zones." Semistructured, 60-minute interviews were conducted with 18 surgeons who were purposively sampled for sex and subspecialty with a snowballing strategy applied to sample for differences in reputation (conservative vs aggressive). Data were collected and analyzed in an iterative manner until thematic saturation was reached. RESULTS: Surgeons described cases that were inside or outside of their personal comfort zones. When considering cases at the boundary of their comfort zones, participants described a variety of factors that could make them feel more or less comfortable. Specific strategies used to modulate this border were also described. Two perspectives on risk taking became apparent: the procedure-centric perspective described how surgeons viewed their colleagues whereas the surgeon-centric perspective described how surgeons viewed themselves. CONCLUSIONS: A framework for understanding surgeon's unique assessment of risk was elaborated. Increased awareness of the factors and strategies identified in this study can foster critical self-reflection by surgeons of their own risk assessments and those of their colleagues, and provide avenues for more explicit educational strategies for surgical training.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Risk-Taking , Surgeons/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Clinical Competence , Decision Making , Female , Grounded Theory , Humans , Male , Risk Assessment , Self Concept
3.
J Surg Educ ; 72(2): 271-7, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25456407

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to capture the preoperative plans of expert hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeons with the goal of finding consistent aspects of the preoperative planning process. DESIGN: HPB surgeons were asked to think aloud when reviewing 4 preoperative computed tomography scans of patients with distal pancreatic tumors. The imaging features they identified and the planned actions they proposed were tabulated. Surgeons viewed the tabulated list of imaging features for each case and rated the relevance of each feature for their subsequent preoperative plan. Average rater intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for each type of data collected (imaging features detected, planned actions reported, and relevance of each feature) to establish whether the surgeons were consistent with one another in their responses. Average rater intraclass correlation coefficient values greater than 0.7 were considered indicative of consistency. SETTING: Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto. PARTICIPANTS: HPB surgeons affiliated with the University of Toronto. RESULTS: A total of 11 HPB surgeons thought aloud when reviewing 4 computed tomography scans. Surgeons were consistent in the imaging features they detected but inconsistent in the planned actions they reported. Of the HPB surgeons, 8 completed the assessment of feature relevance. For 3 of the 4 cases, the surgeons were consistent in rating the relevance of specific imaging features on their preoperative plans. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that HPB surgeons are consistent in some aspects of the preoperative planning process but not others. The findings further our understanding of the preoperative planning process and will guide future research on the best ways to incorporate the teaching and evaluation of preoperative planning into surgical training.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/education , Patient Care Planning/organization & administration , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Preoperative Care/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/surgery , Clinical Decision-Making , Female , Hospitals, University , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Ontario , Operating Rooms/organization & administration , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Patient Outcome Assessment , Problem-Based Learning/methods , Quality Control , Risk Assessment
4.
J Surg Res ; 158(1): 6-9, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19766241

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Access to health care has been a source of controversy and public attention in health policy. The issues of access to and utilization of the healthcare system by infants and children is less well documented. Moreover, the impact on outcomes of race, ethnicity, and economic status in infants is vaguely addressed. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of children who had undergone pyloromyotomy from July 31, 1998 to July 31, 2008 at our public hospital and university teaching hospital. Data abstracted included gestational age at delivery, birth weight, gender, race, insurance status, age at presentation, symptom duration, preoperative ultrasound (US), operative date, laboratory evaluations, as well as preoperative, postoperative, and total length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: The mean total preoperative LOS was twice as long at our public hospital than our private hospital (1.78 d versus 0.85 d, P=0.003). Similarly, the mean total length of stay was 0.87 d longer at our public hospital (3.87 d versus 3 d), which trended toward significance (P=0.06). Significantly, 72% (27/33) patients at the private hospital had their US either as an out-patient or on the day of admission, while only 58% (28/48) had an US performed as expeditiously at the public hospital (P=0.03, chi(2) analysis). CONCLUSIONS: Care at our public hospital leads to delayed diagnosis and treatment, resulting in longer preoperative and total LOS in infants with pyloric stenosis, most likely related to the timing of the preoperative US. Efforts should be made to encourage patients to use the outpatient clinic facilities for their ill infants, or for physicians at public hospitals to expedite the US process once the diagnosis of pyloric stenosis is entertained.


Subject(s)
Pyloric Stenosis/surgery , Child , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Healthcare Disparities , Hospitals, Private , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 48(5): 499-504, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19252102

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Access to health care is a well-recognized issue in health policy, but use once patients have entered the health care system is uncommonly addressed. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of children between 2 and 17 years of age with pathologically confirmed appendicitis at our public city hospital and private university hospital and compared management and outcomes. RESULTS: Among patients with acute appendicitis, the median length of stay was a day longer in the public hospital (2 days vs 1 day, P = <.001) despite a similar complication rate (12% vs 11%). More computed tomography (CT) scans were performed at the public hospital (36% vs 21%, P = .02) with a trend toward less use of ultrasound (US) (54% vs 65%, P = .13). CONCLUSIONS: Children at the public city hospital have a longer length of stay and undergo more expensive imaging. These findings may provide areas for improvement to optimize the care of children with appendicitis at government-funded institutions.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis/diagnosis , Appendicitis/surgery , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Hospitals, Private , Hospitals, Public , Hospitals, University , Adolescent , Appendectomy , Appendicitis/complications , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Diagnostic Imaging , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy , Male , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors
6.
J Pediatr Urol ; 5(2): 142-4, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18926776

ABSTRACT

Here we present a case of successful non-operative management of an iatrogenic recto-urethral fistula in a 13-year-old boy. The fistula was created when urethroscopic repair of a urethral stricture was attempted. Due to the anatomy of the lesion and previous urinary diversion, it was deemed possible to spare this patient diverting colostomy or surgical repair of the fistula. The result was successful closure of the fistula, which was confirmed on retrograde urethrogram. While we do not support the routine use of non-operative management for recto-urethral fistulas we have demonstrated that there are circumstances where it can be safely applied.


Subject(s)
Rectum/diagnostic imaging , Urinary Catheterization , Urinary Fistula/etiology , Urinary Fistula/therapy , Urologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Accidents, Traffic , Adolescent , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease , Male , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Pubic Symphysis/injuries , Radiography , Urethra/diagnostic imaging , Urethra/injuries , Urinary Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...