Monitoring and management of chronic kidney disease in ambulatory care - analysis of clinical and claims data from a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Although chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent in the general population, little research has been conducted on CKD management in ambulatory care. Objective was to assess management and quality of care by evaluating CKD coding in ambulatory care, patient diagnosis awareness, frequency of monitoring and whether appropriate patients are referred to nephrology. METHODS: Clinical data from the population-based cohort Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP-START) were matched with claims data of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. Quality of care was evaluated according international and German recommendations. RESULTS: Data from 1778 participants (56% female, mean age 59 years) were analysed. 10% had eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 (mean age 74 years), 15% had albuminuria. 21% had CKD as defined by KDIGO. 20% of these were coded and 7% self-reported having CKD. Coding increased with GFR stage (G3a 20%, G3b 61%, G4 75%, G5 100%). Serum creatinine and urinary dip stick testing were billed in the majority of all participants regardless of renal function. Testing frequency partially surpassed recommendations. Nephrology consultation was billed in few cases with stage G3b-G4. CONCLUSION: CKD coding increased with stage and was performed reliably in stages ≥ G4, while CKD awareness was low. Adherence to monitoring and referral criteria varied, depending on the applicability of monitoring criteria. For assessing quality of care, consent on monitoring, patient education, referral criteria and coordination of care needs to be established, accounting for patient related factors, including age and comorbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered as DRKS00009812 in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS).

Evaluation of an ambulatory geriatric rehabilitation program - results of a matched cohort study based on claims data.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory geriatric rehabilitation (AGR) is a multidisciplinary outpatient prevention program designed to decrease hospitalisation and dependence on nursing care in multimorbid patients ≥70 years of age. We evaluated the effectiveness of AGR compared to usual care on progression of nursing care levels, nursing home admissions, hospital admissions, incident fractures, mortality rate and total cost of care during a one-year follow-up period. METHODS: Analyses were based on claims data from the health insurance company AOK Nordost. Propensity Score matching was used to match 4 controls to each person receiving the AGR intervention. RESULTS: A total of 632 AGR participants and 2528 matched controls were included. The standardized mean difference of matching variables between cases and controls was small (mean: + 1.4%; range: - 4.4/3.9%). In AGR patients, the progression of nursing care levels (+ 2.2%, 95%CI: - 0.9 /5.3), nursing home admissions (+ 1.7%, 95%CI: - 0.1/3.5), hospital admissions (+ 1.1%, 95%CI: - 3.2/5.4), incident fractures (+ 11.1%, 95%CI: 7.3/15) and mortality rate (+ 1.2%, p = 0.20) showed a less favourable course compared to controls. The average total cost per AGR participant was lower than in the control group (- 353€, 95%CI: - 989€/282€), not including costs for AGR. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis based on claims data showed no clinical benefit from AGR intervention regarding the investigated outcomes. The slightly worse outcomes may reflect limitations in matching based on claims data, which may have insufficiently reflected morbidity and psychosocial factors. It is possible that the intervention group had poorer health status at baseline compared to the control group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00008926, registered 29.07.2015.

[Effect of ambulatory geriatric rehabilitation on polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication-an observational study]. / Effekt der ambulanten geriatrischen Komplexbehandlung auf Polypharmazie und potenziell inadäquate Arzneimittel ­ eine Beobachtungsstudie.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory geriatric rehabilitation (AGR) is a prevention program for multimorbid patients with the contractual agreement to prevent the need for care and hospital admissions and to promote self-sufficiency. It provides an opportunity to reduce the prevalence of polypharmacy and to discontinue potentially inadequate medication (PIM). AIM: The study investigated the effect of AGR on the number of drugs and PIM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The observational longitudinal study was based on claims data from the statutory health insurance AOK Nordost. A comparison of the prescribed drugs with the PRISCUS list was performed. The study investigated the effect of AGR on the number of drugs prescribed and PIM in the period of two quarterly periods before and two quarterly periods after AGR. The numbers of prescribed statins, opioids, antidementia drugs, proton pump inhibitors and antidepressants were assessed and grouped into further prescriptions, new prescriptions and discontinued drug prescriptions. RESULTS: Out of 699 participants 682 (73% women, mean age 79 years, SD ± 5 years) were analyzed. The number of substances and PIM remained at the same levels after AGR. Psycholeptic, antiphlogistic and psychoanaleptic drugs were the most frequently prescribed PIM. The majority of statins, opioids, antidementia drugs, proton pump inhibitors and antidepressants were prescribed further. Antidementia drugs were the medication with the most newly started prescriptions. CONCLUSION: The AGR has no influence on the number of prescribed drugs and PIM. A structured drug review and a conversation with the general practitioner should be strengthened to improve drug safety and reduce polypharmacy as well as undertreatment.

Evaluation of Ambulatory Geriatric Rehabilitation (EAGER): study protocol of a matched cohort study based on claims data.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory geriatric rehabilitation (AGR) is a community based outpatient intervention which aims to improve physical function, maintain independent living of geriatric patients, avoiding hospitalisation and institutionalisation. It should therefore reduce health care costs. The objective of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness of AGR for frail elderly patients insured by the statutory health insurance AOK Nordost compared to care as usual. Outcome variables are progression to higher nursing care levels, admission to nursing home, incident fractures, hospital admission, ambulatory care sensitive hospital admissions, days spent in hospital, and health care costs. METHODS: This matched cohort study aims to estimate average treatment effects of AGR. For this purpose we will compare patients receiving AGR with matched patients receiving care as usual. Patients in the intervention group were treated between the years 2009 and 2013 from three centres in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany. Matching will be conducted using propensity score techniques. Claims data will be provided by the statutory health insurance AOK Nordost. The primary outcomes are the progression of nursing care levels, incident fractures, and admission to nursing home. Secondary outcomes are total and ambulatory care sensitive hospital admissions, and health care costs from the statutory health insurance perspective. Data will be analysed using appropriate regression models. DISCUSSION: This study aims to quantify the effectiveness of AGR. Results will be important for providers of AGR, policy makers and stakeholders to make informed decisions on whether to continue, modify or extend AGR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) S00008926 , registered 29.07.2015.