Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 146(2): 149-51, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19747756

ABSTRACT

In December 2008, the first-ever European Perinatal Health Report was released by EURO-PERISTAT. Part of the EU Health Programme for health surveillance and reporting, this landmark report presents indicators of perinatal health and care derived from routine statistical data in 25 EU Member States and Norway. It also includes chapters from three other European projects with perinatal data: SCPE on cerebral palsy, EUROCAT on congenital anomalies and EURONEOSTAT on very preterm babies admitted to intensive care.


Subject(s)
Health Status Indicators , Health Status , Infant Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Europe , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Norway , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome
2.
Matern Child Health J ; 11(1): 11-7, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16763773

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine pre-pregnancy Medicaid coverage and initiation of prenatal care among women likely eligible for Medicaid coverage regardless of pregnancy. METHODS: The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) was used to identify very low-income women with Medicaid payment for delivery. We then compared prenatal care initiation among women with (Non-GAP) and without (Medicaid GAP) pre-pregnancy Medicaid coverage. RESULTS: Rates of first trimester prenatal care were 47.3% for women in the Medicaid GAP, 70.0% for women who were not. The adjusted odds ratio for being in the Medicaid GAP and delayed prenatal care was 2.7 (95% CI 1.2, 6.2), although this varied by race/ethnicity and education. The relationship was strongest among White and Hispanic women with less than a high school education: OR=13.8, (95% CI 3.0, 62.7) and OR=19.0 (95% CI 2.4, 149.2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-pregnancy Medicaid coverage appears to be associated with early initiation of prenatal care. Almost a decade after welfare reform, it is essential to preserve the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women, foster Medicaid family planning waivers, and promote access to primary care and early prenatal care, particularly for very low-income women.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/economics , Maternal Welfare/economics , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Medically Uninsured/statistics & numerical data , Poverty , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/methods , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Birth Certificates , Chi-Square Distribution , Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Welfare/trends , Medicaid/legislation & jurisprudence , Poverty/ethnology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Prenatal Care/economics , Risk Factors , United States , White People/statistics & numerical data
3.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 17(1): 162-79, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16520525

ABSTRACT

The passage of welfare reform in 1996 led to sweeping changes in both welfare and Medicaid policy. This study examines the pre-pregnancy Medicaid coverage of women on public aid who had Medicaid payment for delivery in the time periods before and after welfare reform. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data were used to examine changes in the prevalence of being in the Medicaid Gap (i.e., having no pre-pregnancy Medicaid coverage despite having Medicaid payment for delivery) in eight states between 1996 (n=302) and 1998-2000 (n=364). Of this population, 16.1% of women were in the Medicaid Gap in 1996, compared with 36.5% in 1998-2000. The overall adjusted relationship between time period and being in the Medicaid Gap was 4.5 (95% CI 2.1-9.6). This analysis suggests that in the period after welfare reform, there was an increase in the prevalence of very low-income women who, despite having their delivery paid for by Medicaid, did not have pre-pregnancy Medicaid coverage. Lack of Medicaid coverage regardless of pregnancy, particularly among women who historically have had such coverage and who are at higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, has important implications for progress toward Healthy People 2010 objectives in prenatal care initiation and utilization, low birth weight, and other pregnancy outcomes.


Subject(s)
Insurance Coverage/legislation & jurisprudence , Medicaid/legislation & jurisprudence , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Preconception Care/economics , Prenatal Care/economics , Adult , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Pregnancy , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...