Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Rambam Maimonides Med J ; 14(3)2023 07 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37212492

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Avoiding rectal thermometry is recommended in patients with neutropenic fever. Permeability of the anal mucosa may result in a higher risk of bacteremia in these patients. Still, this recommendation is based on only a few studies. METHODS: This retrospective study included all individuals admitted to our emergency department during 2014-2017 with afebrile (body temperature <38.3°C) neutropenia (neutrophil count <500 cells/microL) who were over the age of 18. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of a rectal temperature measurement. The primary outcome was bacteremia during the first five days of index hospitalization; the secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The study included 40 patients with rectal temperature measurements and 407 patients whose temperatures were only measured orally. Among patients with oral temperature measurements, 10.6% had bacteremia, compared to 5.1% among patients who had rectal temperature measurements. Rectal temperature measurement was not associated with bacteremia, neither in non-matched (odds ratio [OR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07-1.77) nor in matched cohort analyses (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.04-3.29). In-hospital mortality was also similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with neutropenia who had their temperature taken using a rectal thermometer did not experience a higher frequency of events of documented bacteremia or increased in-hospital mortality.

2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 159(2): 537-543, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35278219

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the anticipation phenomenon among hereditary breast cancer patients, by evaluating trends in age at diagnosis and phenotype of breast cancer across two successive generation pairs of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers/non-carriers with breast cancer after reports of an earlier age of diagnosis in successive generations among BRCA1/2 mutation carrier families. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study. Patient characteristics, pathologic data and survival were compared between mothers and daughters and between carriers and non-carriers. RESULTS: Overall, 126 patients were found, who formed 67 pairs of mothers and daughters diagnosed with breast cancer and genetically tested for BRCA mutations. Age at diagnosis was significantly younger in the daughter versus mother generation, in both groups of BRCA carriers/non-carriers. Tumor characteristics were not different between mothers and daughters. Survival analysis revealed a not significant better outcome for the daughter generation versus the mother generation. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer appeared to be diagnosed at an earlier age in successive generations among BRCA mutation carriers and non-carriers. The fact that we also observed a downshift at age of diagnosis in non-carrier pairs emphasizes that other factors (environmental, lifestyle, or social) may influence the age at diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Genes, BRCA2 , Anticipation, Genetic , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Heterozygote , Humans , Mutation , Retrospective Studies
3.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 15(5): 102276, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34509792

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To identify risk factors for recurrent episodes of DKA that may allow the development of an effective prevention strategies. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of admissions for DKA in adult patients between 2004, and 2017 in a tertiary hospital. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of DKA of patients were stratified into an isolated episode of DKA (group 1) and recurrent episodes (group 2). RESULTS: 385 patients were included in the study, 281 had a single admission of DKA, and 104 had recurrent admissions. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in demographic or clinical variables. Patients in the recurrent DKA group had a younger age at diabetes diagnosis, 32.1 ± 17.08 vs. 36.13 ± 19.52 (p = 0.05). Patients with A1C greater than 9.0% were associated with recurrent DKA in cox regression analysis (HR 2.023; 95% Cl 1.112-3.679; p = 0.021). Recurrent DKA was a significant predictor of one-year mortality in cox regression analysis (HR 0.172; 95% CI 0.04-0.742; p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: High A1C levels, which account for poorly controlled diabetes, was identified as the strongest predictor of recurrent DKA. This patient population warrants particular attention and the development of intervention strategies in further studies.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/diagnosis , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/blood , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Israel , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
4.
Intern Med J ; 51(6): 948-954, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32253805

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is an acute metabolic condition, sometimes requiring admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). AIMS: To investigate the outcomes of DKA patients admitted to a hospital with restricted ICU capacity. METHODS: We included all DKA patients above age 18 who were admitted to a tertiary hospital during 2004-2017. We conducted multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for ICU bed availability to analyse parameters associated with ICU admission, and a composite outcome of mortality, DKA recurrence and mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Among 382 DKA patients in our cohort, 94 (24.6%) were admitted to the ICU. The in-hospital mortality was 4.7%. Low bicarbonate (<10 mmoL/L) and pH (<7) levels at presentation were associated with ICU admission (P < 0.001 for both). In multivariate models availability of beds in the ICU was not associated with ICU admission, mortality or DKA recurrence of any type. CONCLUSION: In a setting of limited ICU capacity, DKA treatment does not necessarily require admission to the ICU. When the rising rates of diabetes mellitus and the associated elevated rates of DKA are taken into account, our results highlight the importance of including step-down units when devising local protocols for care of these patients.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Ketoacidosis , Adolescent , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/epidemiology , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/therapy , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers
5.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 68(6): 1256-1261, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32134118

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Much of the research previously done on diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) was based on a young population with type 1 diabetes mellitus (type 1 DM). But substantial numbers of DKA episodes occur in patients with a prior history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (type 2 DM). There is a lack of Data are lacking about DKA in older adults. The aims of this study were to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcomes of older adult patients with DKA. DESIGN: Retrospective matched cohort study of adult patients hospitalized with DKA between 2004 and 2017. SETTING: Soroka University Medical Center, Be'er Sheva, Israel. PARTICIPANTS: The clinical characteristics of DKA patients 65 years and older were compared with patients younger than 65 years. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The study cohort included 385 consecutive patients for whom the admission diagnosis was DKA: 307 patients (79.7%) younger than 65 years (group 1), and 78 patients (20.3%) older than 65 years (group 2). Patients in group 2 compared with group 1 had a significantly higher Charlson index (6 [6-6] vs 6 [6-7]; P < .0001) and DM with target organ damage (24.4% vs 6.2%; P < .0001). Patients in group 2 compared with group 1 had more serious disease according to results of laboratory investigations. The total in-hospital mortality rate of patients in group 2 was 16.7% compared with 1.6% in patients in group 1 in a sex and co-morbidities matched analysis (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: DKA in older adults is a common problem. The serious co-morbidities and precipitating factors such as infection/sepsis, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular accidents, may explain the severity of the problem of DKA in older adults and the high rate of mortality of these patients. DKA appears to be a lifethreatening condition in older adults. The alertness of physicians to DKA in older adults, timely diagnosis, proper treatment, and prevention are cornerstones of care. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1256-1261, 2020.


Subject(s)
Comorbidity , Diabetic Ketoacidosis , Hospital Mortality/trends , Adult , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/epidemiology , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/mortality , Female , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Male , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...