ABSTRACT
Normothermic ex vivo liver machine perfusion (NEVLP) has been developed to address the increasing organ shortage in liver transplantation, through optimal preservation, assessment, and conditioning of grafts from extended criteria donors. There remains a need to establish simple and standardized animal models that simulate clinical NEVLP to test novel therapies. Liver grafts from 36 Sprague-Dawley rats were perfused for 6 h in a dual-vessel NEVLP system with a Dulbecco's modified Eagles medium-based perfusate supplemented with rat plasma and erythrocytes. Varying doses of the clinically used vasodilator epoprostenol, Kupffer cell inhibitor glycine, and a Steen™-based perfusate were assessed. Perfusion pressures and bile production were recorded, and perfusate was analyzed for transaminase secretion. Tissue samples were evaluated histologically, and levels of cytokines and 8-Isoprostane were measured. Increasing levels of epoprostenol and the addition of glycine resulted in a stepwise decrease of transaminase secretion and improved bile production. Steen further decreased transaminase release and interleukin 1 beta levels. Liver grafts perfused with the optimized Steen-based protocol exhibited lowest levels of oxidative stress and best-preserved liver integrity. In conclusion, epoprostenol seemed to ameliorate liver function and prevent cellular damage beyond its vasodilatory effect, with glycine acting synergistically. The anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties of Steen further improved the outcome of perfusion. Our rodent NEVLP system may be used to rapidly test new agents for the pharmacologic conditioning of livers and help translate findings from bench-to-bedside.
ABSTRACT
A growing number of clinical risk scores have been proposed to predict allograft failure after liver transplantation. However, validation of currently available scores in the Eurotransplant region is still lacking. We aimed to analyze all clinically relevant donor and recipient risk scores on a large German liver transplantation data set and performed a retrospective cohort analysis of liver transplantations performed at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin from January 2007 until December 2021 with organs from donation after brain death. We analyzed 9 previously published scores in 906 liver transplantations [Eurotransplant donor risk index (ET-DRI/DRI), donor age and model for end-stage liver disease (D-MELD), balance of risk (BAR), early allograft dysfunction (EAD), model for early allograft function (MEAF), liver graft assessment following transplantation (L-GrAFT7), early allograft failure simplified estimation (EASE), and a score by Rhu and colleagues). The EASE score had the best predictive value for 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month graft survival with a c-statistic of 0.8, 0.77, and 0.78, respectively. In subgroup analyses, the EASE score was suited best for male recipients with a high-MELD (>25) and an EAD organ. Scores only based on pretransplant data performed worse compared to scores including postoperative data (eg, ET-DRI vs. EAD, p<0.001 at 3-month graft survival). Out of these, the BAR score performed best with a c-statistic of 0.6. This a comprehensive comparison of the clinical utility of risk scores after liver transplantation. The EASE score sufficiently predicted 12-month graft and patient survival. Despite a relatively complex calculation, the EASE score provides significant prognostic value for patients and health care professionals in the Eurotransplant region.
