Behavioral Assessment With the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Is Safe and Feasible in Critically Ill Patients With Disorders of Consciousness.

OBJECTIVES: Accurate classification of disorders of consciousness (DoC) is key in developing rehabilitation plans after brain injury. The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) is a sensitive measure of consciousness validated in the rehabilitation phase of care. We tested the feasibility, safety, and impact of CRS-R-guided rehabilitation in the ICU for patients with DoC after acute hemorrhagic stroke. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: This single-center study was conducted in the neurocritical care unit at the University of Maryland Medical Center. PATIENTS: We analyzed records from consecutive patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), who underwent serial CRS-R assessments during ICU admission from April 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021, where CRS-R less than 8 is vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS); CRS-R greater than or equal to 8 is a minimally conscious state (MCS). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Outcomes included adverse events during CRS-R evaluations and associations between CRS-R and discharge disposition, therapy-based function, and mobility. We examined the utility of CRS-R compared with other therapist clinical assessment tools in predicting discharge disposition. Seventy-six patients (22 SAH, 54 ICH, median age = 59, 50% female) underwent 276 CRS-R sessions without adverse events. Discharge to acute rehabilitation occurred in 4.4% versus 41.9% of patients with a final CRS-R less than 8 and CRS-R greater than or equal to 8, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 13.4; 95% CI, 2.7-66.1; p < 0.001). Patients with MCS on final CRS-R completed more therapy sessions during hospitalization and had improved mobility and functional performance. Compared with other therapy assessment tools, the CRS-R had the best performance in predicting discharge disposition (area under the curve: 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.94; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Early neurorehabilitation guided by CRS-R appears to be feasible and safe in the ICU following hemorrhagic stroke complicated by DoC and may enhance access to inpatient rehabilitation, with the potential for lasting benefit on recovery. Further research is needed to assess generalizability and understand the impact on long-term outcomes.

ED BP Management for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review most recent literature on management of blood pressure in acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and provide practice recommendations for the emergency clinician. RECENT FINDINGS: There is increased risk of aneurysmal rebleeding with systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than 160 mmHg in the acute setting. Avoiding large degrees of blood pressure variability improves clinical outcomes in aneurysmal SAH. Acute lowering of SBP to a range of 140-160 mmHg decreases risk of rebleeding while also maintaining cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) after aneurysmal rupture. Treatment with a short acting antihypertensive agent allows for rapid titration of blood pressure (BP) and reduces BP variability. Elevations in intracranial pressure occur commonly after SAH due to increased intracranial blood volume, cerebral edema, or development of hydrocephalus. Clinicians should be familiar with changes in cerebral autoregulation and effects on CPP when treating elevated BP, in order to mitigate the risk of secondary neurological injury.