Vascular Ultrasound for In Vivo Assessment of Arterial Pathologies in a Murine Model of Atherosclerosis and Aortic Aneurysm.

Vascular diseases like atherosclerosis and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are common pathologies in the western world, promoting various potentially fatal conditions. Here, we evaluate high-resolution (HR) ultrasound in mouse models of atherosclerosis and AAA as a useful tool for noninvasive monitoring of early vascular changes in vivo. We used Apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE-/-) mice as an atherosclerosis model and induced AAA development by the implementation of Angiotensin II-releasing osmotic minipumps. HR ultrasound of the carotid artery or the abdominal aorta was performed to monitor vascular remodeling in vivo. Images were analyzed by speckle tracking algorithms and correlated to histological analyses and subsequent automated collagen quantification. Consistent changes were observed via ultrasound in both models: Global radial strain (GRS) was notably reduced in the AAA model (23.8 ± 2.8% vs. 12.5 ± 2.5%, p = 0.01) and in the atherosclerotic mice (20.6 ± 1.3% vs. 15.8 ± 0.9%, p = 0.02). In mice with AAA, vessel distensibility was significantly reduced, whereas intima-media thickness was increased in atherosclerotic mice. The area and collagen content of the tunica media were increased in diseased arteries of both models as measured by automated image analysis of Picrosirius Red-stained aortic sections. Correlation analysis revealed a strong correlation of multiple parameters, predicting early vascular damage in HR ultrasound and histological examinations. In conclusion, our findings underscore the potential of HR ultrasound in effectively tracing early alterations in arterial wall properties in murine models of atherosclerosis and AAA.

How COVID-19 kick-started online learning in medical education-The DigiMed study.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to far-reaching restrictions of social and professional life, affecting societies all over the world. To contain the virus, medical schools had to restructure their curriculum by switching to online learning. However, only few medical schools had implemented such novel learning concepts. We aimed to evaluate students' attitudes to online learning to provide a broad scientific basis to guide future development of medical education. METHODS: Overall, 3286 medical students from 12 different countries participated in this cross-sectional, web-based study investigating various aspects of online learning in medical education. On a 7-point Likert scale, participants rated the online learning situation during the pandemic at their medical schools, technical and social aspects, and the current and future role of online learning in medical education. RESULTS: The majority of medical schools managed the rapid switch to online learning (78%) and most students were satisfied with the quantity (67%) and quality (62%) of the courses. Online learning provided greater flexibility (84%) and led to unchanged or even higher attendance of courses (70%). Possible downsides included motivational problems (42%), insufficient possibilities for interaction with fellow students (67%) and thus the risk of social isolation (64%). The vast majority felt comfortable using the software solutions (80%). Most were convinced that medical education lags behind current capabilities regarding online learning (78%) and estimated the proportion of online learning before the pandemic at only 14%. In order to improve the current curriculum, they wish for a more balanced ratio with at least 40% of online teaching compared to on-site teaching. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the positive attitude of medical students towards online learning. Furthermore, it reveals a considerable discrepancy between what students demand and what the curriculum offers. Thus, the COVID-19 pandemic might be the long-awaited catalyst for a new "online era" in medical education.