[Early rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study on how to induce the remission]. / Induzione della remissione delle poliartriti reumatoidi all'esordio: studio prospettico.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the aggressive use of DMARDs can control the clinical disease in the early arthritis, to define new parameters of the disease aggressivity and to study the effectiveness of RMN in comparison with RX focusing on the articular erosions. METHODS: 45 patients having a case of early arthritis (less 6 months) with 3 or more swollen joints were recruited and treated with 80 mg of steroids in order to distinguish persistent arthritis from non persistent ones. Afterward we began to use DMARDs with persistent arthritis and, if it wasn't helpful, we shifted to anti-TNFalpha therapy. The clinical response was valued by SDAI. RESULTS: After 1 year our therapeutic approach showed a remission in 60% of the patients. The 82% of remaining obtained a significant SDAI improvement and only in 3 cases we used anti-TNFalpha due to a persistent high disease activity. Anti-CCp were positive in 46% of patients in remission and in 53% of the rest. The bone erosions were present in 4 patients only and they were detected by RMN, only 2 by RX. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a clinical remission in the 60% of patients treated with aggressive DMARDs. During our trial, anti-CCp weren't predictive about the therapy response. We observed that RMN is more effective than RX in detecting erosions and it's necessary for diagnosis and follow-up of early arthritis.

[Anti-TNFalpha agents in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a study of a group of 105 over sixty five years old patients]. / I farmaci biologici anti-TNFalpha nel paziente anziano affetto da artrite reumatoide: studio di una coorte di 105 pazienti ultra-sessantacinquenni.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and the safety of anti-TNF alfa treatment in elderly patients (>/=65 years old) with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in comparison with younger (17-65 years old). METHODS: We considered retrospectively 295 patients, affected by RA and treated with anti-TNF alfa drugs. They were divided in two groups, according to their age, and followed up for two years: over-65-years old patients (190) and under-65-years old patients (105). Effectiveness of drugs was assessed analyzing RA disease activity (DAS28, DAS44, SDAI), functional status (HAQ) and serological parameters (CRP) before and after anti-TNF alfa therapy. Safety was studied considering discontinuation rate of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and collateral events rate. RESULTS: At baseline, elderly patients showed higher disease activity's score (DAS 28, DAS44, SDAI, HAQ) with important loss of articular function (worse quality of life, HAQ) than younger patients (p<0.05). During the therapy, improvement in clinical parameters was observed (DAS28, DAS44 and SDAI) with no significant difference between the two groups. In elderly patients disability index, on the contrary, improved less than in younger (p<0.05). After treatment, also CRP decreased less in elderly patients (p<0.05). During the follow-up, 74 over-65-years old patients (38.95%) and 116 under-65-years old patients (38.05%) discontinued anti-TNF alfa therapy because of loss of efficacy (20.52% vs 11.42%), severe adverse events (17.34% vs 25.67%), voluntary discontinuation or good clinical response (1% vs 0.95%). No differences were shown about the frequency and reasons of anti-TNF alfa withdrawal (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF alfa treatment was efficacious and safe in both groups of patients. These drugs induced improvement in disease activity, apart from the age. No functional improvement was observed in HAQ, showing the irreversible loss of articular function and the incomplete recovery in elderly patients. Age doesn't interfere with the possibility to treat elderly patients with anti-TNF alfa drugs.

Prophylaxis and therapy of HBV infection in 20 patients treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs or with biological agents for rheumatic diseases.

OBJECT: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of lamivudine in patients with HBV infection needing immunosuppressive treatment for rheumatic diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with rheumatic diseases planned to receive immunosuppressive DMARDs or biological agents were screened for HBV markers. In all active carriers antiviral treatment was recommended. Inactive carriers (HBsAg positive, aminotrasferase and viremia persistently normal) were divided into two risk categories according to the type and the degree of immunosuppression, and antiviral prophylaxis was started only in patients of the high risk category. Antiviral treatment was recommended also in potential occult carriers (HBsAg negative, HBcAb positive) treated with rituximab. In twenty patients antiviral treatment was started: 1 was a potential occult carrier planned to receive rituximab; 9 were inactive carriers, in which prophylactic therapy was needed for a high risk of HBV reactivation (in 3, for the use of TNF blocking agents); 10 were treated for active viral replication. Prophylaxis and therapy were performed with lamivudine. In three patients adefovir was associated. RESULTS: Antiviral drugs were well tolerated. In all cases, immunosuppressive treatment was given for the planned duration of therapy, with good results on the rheumatic diseases. Median duration of antiviral treatment was 19 months (for a total of 386 month/person). No cases of viral reactivation were observed. CONCLUSION: Our experience demonstrates the feasibility of a prophylaxis and therapy of HBV infection in patients with rheumatic diseases. This approach reduces the risk of viral reactivation and allows the choice of the optimal immunosuppressive treatment in rheumatic patients.

Anti-TNF-alpha treatment in rheumatoid arthritis with anti-Ro/SSA antibodies. Analysis of 17 cases among a cohort of 322 treated patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF-alpha treatment in RA patients with and without anti-Ro antibodies, in order to detect any change in their immunological or clinical profile. METHODS: Autoantibodies in 322 patients being treated with anti-TNF-alpha drugs were studied; 17 were found to be anti-Ro positive, while 305 were anti-Ro negative. RESULTS: Two groups, comparable in terms of sex distribution, RA duration and anti-TNF-alpha drug employed, showed symmetrical, erosive polyarticular RA with high disease activity. Anti-TNF-alpha led to significant improvement in both groups. At baseline rheumatoid factor and ANA, globally positive in 68.6% and 40%, were more frequent in anti-Ro positive sera. ANA showed a rising trend beginning in the 6th month of treatment in both groups, which was always statistically significant compared to baseline. Anti-dsDNA antibodies, measured using either CLIFT and ELISA or the Farr assay, remained stable in the first 6 months, then increased at 12th and 18th month, and subsequently declined. No difference was detected between the two groups regarding the number or cause of dropouts, but lupus-like disease was more frequent in anti-Ro positive subjects (p = 0.012). In addition, two cases of NHL were detected. CONCLUSION: Anti-TNF-alpha treatment was shown to be effective in patients with anti-Ro antibodies. Although anti-dsDNA and lupus-like disease were more frequent in anti-Ro positive patients, severe manifestations of systemic involvement were not observed. A longer follow-up is warranted to evaluate the risk of NHL in these patients.

[TNF-alpha inhibition in anti-Ro/SSA positive patients with rheumatoid arthritis: clinical and immunologic effects]. / Inibizione del TNFalpha in pazienti con anticorpi anti-Ro/SSA e artrite reumatoide: analisi clinica e sierologica.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse efficacy and safety of anti-TNFalpha treatment in 17 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (AR) and anti-Ro antibodies, in order to detect difference in clinical and immunological response. METHODS: 322 patients, affected by RA and treated with anti-TNFalpha drugs, were considered, searching every 6-12 months ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-ENA antibodies. Seventeen were anti-Ro positive and 305 anti-Ro negative before starting treatment. RESULTS: Anti-Ro positive subjects showed active arthritis at baseline (mean DAS: 5), with frequent extra-articular features, such as ocular and oral sicca symptoms. They showed rapid and stable improvement during the treatment, with-out significant difference compared to anti-Ro negative group. A good clinical Eular response was shown in 46% of anti-Ro negative subjects, steady stable during time. On the contrary, fewer anti-Ro positive patients seem to be "good" responders. RA remission (DAS <1,6) was achieved in 9-25% of anti-Ro positive and 21-29% of anti-Ro negative, without significant difference. Antinuclear antibodies tend to increase in both groups, during the time. Anti-DNA increased to 40% of anti-Ro positive sera since 6th month, while they slightly increased in first 12 months in anti-Ro negative ones, then decreased to baseline value. No differences were shown about the frequency and reasons of anti-TNFalpha withdrawal, except for cutaneous lupus-like disease, more detected in anti-Ro positive group. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNFalpha drugs are effective in anti-Ro positive RA as well as other RA patients. Anti-DNA positivity and lupus-like disease were more frequently observed in anti-Ro positive group.

[In vitro effect of asbestos fibers on short-term cultures of human lymphocytes]. / Studio dell'effetto in vitro di fibre di asbesto su colture a breve termine di linfociti umani.

The endocellular incorporation of asbestos fibres seems to be capable to induce on Chinese hamster cell cultures numerical and structural chromosome aberrations. In the present study asbestos fibres have been added at different concentrations to human cultured lymphocytes which have been harvested at 48 and 72 h, respectively. The results do not show significant difference in the distribution of chromatid and chromosome-type aberrations between the control cultures and the cultures treated with asbestos.