Diversity in Plastic Surgery: Analysis of Representation of Sex and Ethnic Diversity in Plastic Surgery Residency Social Media Accounts.

BACKGROUND: Increasing health care diversity is critical to overcoming disparities. Plastic surgery has been working to improve diversity through various efforts, including social media movements like Diversify PRS and #ilooklikeasurgeon. Because residency programs' social media sites serve as a public symbol of the programs' values and can attract potential applicants, we sought to analyze such platforms for content highlighting sex and ethnic diversity. METHODS: Integrated plastic surgery residency programs during the 2020 to 2021 academic year were found on the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons website, and their associated social media accounts were identified. The authors reviewed each program's account for all posts published by November 8, 2021, for content promoting sex or ethnic diversity. Any hashtags related to diversity were also recorded. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare percentages of total social media posts related to sex and ethnic diversity between programs (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Of 82 programs, 76 (92.7%) had active Instagram accounts, 29 (35.4%) had active Facebook accounts, and 29 (35.4%) had active Twitter accounts. Across all platforms, 19.0% of all posts were promoting sex diversity and 3.3% were promoting ethnic diversity. Of 4651 posts promoting sex diversity, 4067 (87.4%) highlighted women, 1017 (21.9%) featured all-women teams, 779 (16.7%) used sex diversity-related hashtags, and 300 (6.5%) included purposeful statements. Of 808 posts promoting ethnic diversity, 527 (65.2%) used ethnic diversity-related hashtags, 224 (27.7%) included purposeful statements, 199 (24.6%) mentioned ethnic background, and 36 (4.5%) used different skin-toned emojis. Programs did not vary in percentages of posts related to diversity by geographic region, ranking, accreditation length, or engagement rate. The percentage of posts promoting sex diversity was greater than that promoting ethnic diversity (P < 0.001). The most used diversity hashtag was #ilooklikeasurgeon. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the importance of increasing recruitment of trainees from diverse backgrounds to plastic surgery and the global reach of social media movements like #ilooklikeasurgeon, sex and ethnic diversity are still poorly promoted on residency social media accounts. Increasing such content is a simple yet powerful way to create a culture of inclusivity for all applicants.

Research Productivity of Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents: Does Reputation Matter?

INTRODUCTION: It is unknown whether the ranking of plastic surgery residency programs influences resident research output. This study aims to determine whether program reputation and other factors are associated with integrated plastic surgery resident academic productivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Programs were divided into four tiers based on Doximity reputation rankings. Residents from 2019 to 2020 were found through program websites and social media accounts. Works published during residency were identified through PubMed and Scopus from July 1 of each resident's intern year to August 10, 2020. Variables included resident demographics and medical school, residency reputation ranking, geographic region, and medical school affiliation. 'High research output' was defined as having ≥75th percentile of publications adjusted by training year. RESULTS: In total, 921 residents in 80 programs were identified. The median (IQR) number of total publications and original articles was 3 (1-6) and 2 (0-4), respectively. On multivariable analysis, residents in top-20 ranked programs (OR = 2.31, 95% CI [1.55; 3.43], P < 0.001) or from programs associated with top-20 medical schools (OR = 1.61, 95% CI [1.08; 2.41], P = 0.020) were more likely to have higher research output. On the other hand, coming from a top-50 in research medical school (OR = 1.80, 95% CI [1.31; 2.47], P < 0.001) or being in a program affiliated with a top-20 medical school (OR = 2.52, 95% CI [1.69; 3.78], P < 0.001) were associated with higher original article output. Gender and geographic location were not associated with higher research output. CONCLUSIONS: Program reputation and affiliated medical school research rankings are associated with research productivity during integrated plastic surgery residency. Applicants with a particular interest in research careers may consider this as they apply to residency.

Trends in Female Plastic Surgery Resident Authorship - Signs of Changing Times?

OBJECTIVE: Gender discrepancies exist in academia for leadership positions, advancement opportunities, and research. As of 2019, the ratio of total male-to-female attending plastic and reconstructive surgeons was 4.8:1. However, the ratio of male-to-female residents in integrated plastic surgery programs fell to 1.3:1, indicating rising female representation. With more balanced gender distributions of residents, the authors sought to determine whether this translates to greater equality of opportunities and achievements. Specifically, this study compares the academic productivity of male and female integrated plastic surgery residents. METHODS: A list of integrated plastic surgery residency programs was obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website and ranked by reputation using the Doximity Residency Navigator. Integrated plastic surgery residents from 2019 to 2020 were identified via program websites and social media accounts. Works published during residency were identified through PubMed and Scopus from July 1 of each resident's intern year through August 10, 2020. Demographic variables for residents, including training class and medical school, as well as for programs, including geographic region, Doximity ranking, and medical school affiliation, were collected. Medical schools were ranked according to US News by research. Research productivity was assessed through the number of total research articles with authorship position (first, second, or last), the number of articles published in plastic surgery journals with the highest impact factors (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Aesthetic Surgery Journal), and H-indices. Chi-Squared tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to make comparisons between male and female residents (α = 0.05). RESULTS: In total, 931 residents in 81 integrated plastic surgery programs were identified, including 534 (57.4%) male and 397 (42.6%) female residents. There were no differences between male and female residents in terms of training year or program geography. Female residents were more likely to come from a top-50 medical school than males (54.7% vs. 48.1%, p = 0.049). There were no significant differences in gender distribution of residents from top-20 programs or programs affiliated with a top-20 medical school. The median (IQR) number of publications in total, and for each gender, was 3 (1-6). There was no difference in the number of total publications by training year by gender, besides the second-year resident class where male residents had a median (IQR) of 2 (1-4) compared to 1 (0-3) (p = 0.028). Male and female residents did not differ with regards to authorship position or proportion of times publishing in top journals. The distribution of H-indices for male residents was slightly higher than female residents (p = 0.003), but the median (IQR) was the same at 3 (1-5). CONCLUSIONS: Currently, male and female integrated plastic surgery residents have similar levels of academic productivity. This suggests that female representation is slowly increasing along the pipeline in academia, representing a paradigm shift from previous trends of gender inequality in plastic surgery.