Pollen-stigma adhesion in Arabidopsis: a species-specific interaction mediated by lipophilic molecules in the pollen exine.

To investigate the nature and role of cell adhesion in plants, we analyzed the initial step of pollination in Arabidopsis: the binding of pollen grains to female stigma cells. Here we show this interaction occurs within seconds of pollination. Because it takes place prior to pollen hydration, it also requires adhesion molecules that can act in a virtually dry environment. We developed assays that monitored adhesion of populations of pollen grains and individual cells. Adhesion between pollen and stigma cells is highly selective - Arabidopsis pollen binds with high affinity to Arabidopsis stigmas, while pollen from other species fails to adhere. Initial binding is independent of the extracellular pollen coat (tryphine), indicating that adhesion molecules reside elsewhere on the pollen surface, most likely within the exine walls. Immediately after pollination, the stigma surface becomes altered at the interface, acquiring a pattern that interlocks with the exine; this pattern is evident only with pollen from Arabidopsis and its close relatives. Purified exine fragments bind to stigma cells, and biochemical analyses indicate that this specific, rapid and anhydrous adhesion event is mediated by lipophilic interactions.

An antiglycolipid antibody inhibits Madin-Darby canine kidney cell adhesion to laminin and interferes with basolateral polarization and tight junction formation.

Epithelial cells polarize not only in response to cell-cell contacts, but also to contacts with a substratum composed of extracellular matrix molecules. To probe the role of specific matrix constituents in epithelial cell polarization, we investigated the effects of an adhesion-blocking mAb, 12B12, on initial polarization of MDCK cells. The 12B12 antibody, raised against whole MDCK cells, blocks adhesion to laminin by 65% but has no effect on adhesion of cells to collagen type I. Taking advantage of this antibody's function-blocking activity, as well as the fact that MDCK cells secrete laminin, the role of endogenous laminin in polarization was examined by plating cells on collagen-coated substrata in the presence of the antibody. Under these conditions, cell spreading was reduced 1.5h after plating, and cells were flatter and had fewer microvilli after 24 h. Even though lateral cell membranes were closely apposed, transepithelial resistance in the presence of the antibody was significantly reduced relative to controls. When the polarization of specific apical and basolateral markers was examined both biochemically and immunocytochemically in the presence of the antibody, we observed that the apical marker polarized at normal rates while basolateral markers did not. Surprisingly, the 12B12 antibody was not directed against any known cell adhesion protein but reacted specifically with Forssman antigen, a glycosphingolipid. These results suggest that glycolipids may play a significant role in cell adhesion via laminin and in epithelial cell polarization.

Integrin expression and localization in normal MDCK cells and transformed MDCK cells lacking apical polarity.

Epithelial cells polarize in response to contacts with the extracellular matrix and with neighboring cells. Interactions of cells with the extracellular matrix are mediated mainly by the integrin family of receptors. To begin to understand the role of integrins in polarization, we have investigated the expression and localization of three integrin families in the polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) epithelial cell line and in transformed MDCK cells lacking apical polarity. We find that MDCK cells express several beta 1 integrins, including alpha 2 beta 1, alpha 3 beta 1, and an unidentified integrin designated alpha x beta 1. The beta 1 integrins are the major receptors for collagens I and IV and laminin in MDCK cells, since a blocking anti-beta 1 antibody almost totally abolishes adhesion to these proteins. They also express a vitronectin receptor tentatively identified as alpha v beta 3, and the epithelial-specific integrin alpha 6 beta 4. The latter is not a laminin receptor in MDCK cells because a function blocking anti-alpha 6 antibody has no effect on cell adhesion to laminin. All three integrin families are expressed exclusively on both the basal and lateral surfaces, as determined by immunofluorescence microscopy and surface biotinylation. Transformed MDCK cells express beta 1 integrins as well as alpha v beta 3 and alpha 6 beta 4, but show alterations in the beta 1 family. Expression of alpha x is lacking, and the relative amount of the beta 1 subunit is diminished, resulting in the accumulation of Endo-H-sensitive alpha 3. In addition, surface biotinylation and immunofluorescence indicate that significant amounts of both alpha 2 beta 1 and alpha 3 beta 1 appear on not only the basolateral but also the apical plasma membrane. These results indicate that integrins are the major receptors for the extracellular matrix in MDCK cells, and that they may affect epithelial cell polarization by mediating not only cell-substratum but also cell-cell contacts.

Microphotometric, ultrastructural, and electrophysiological analyses of light-dependent processes on visual receptors in white-eyed wild-type and norpA (no receptor potential) mutant Drosophila.

We examined a white-eyed strain of the norpA mutant (norpA;cn bw) and white (w)norpA+ controls using microspectrophotometry (MSP), electron microscopy (EM), and electroretinography (ERG). These studies revealed that light mediates receptor demise in norpA even though norpA lacks phototransduction. Rhodopsin and the rhabdomere which houses it decrease with increasing age in norpA but not in w with rearing on a 12 h light/12-h dark cycle or in constant light. At higher temperature in norpA;cn bw and w reared in constant light, visual pigment decreases, rhabdomeres diminish, and cells die. Importantly, dark rearing blocked visual pigment loss in norpA;cn bw; the M-potential, an ERG reflection of visual pigment level, corroborated this finding. MSP showed that norpA's visual pigment loss was not due to acute loss of metarhodopsin, rhodopsin's photoproduct. NorpA blocks certain processes expected to be light elicited. The alteration of visual pigment as a function of time of day, present in w controls, is absent in white-eyed norpA, suggesting that light-induced depolarization may be necessary to entrain the rhythm. Microspectrofluorometry using the fluorescent dye, Lucifer yellow, suggested that norpA lacks a light-induced uptake mechanism; using control flies, we determined the stimulus parameters required for uptake in vivo. An attempt to "cure" norpA;cn bw by replacement "therapy" using phospholipase C, missing in norpA's phototransduction cascade, was largely unsuccessful.