Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 5163, 2019 03 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30914742

ABSTRACT

Focal adhesions (FA) are a complex network of proteins that allow the cell to form physical contacts with the extracellular matrix (ECM). FA assemble and disassemble in a dynamic process, orchestrated by a variety of cellular components. However, the underlying mechanisms that regulate adhesion turnover remain poorly understood. Here we show that RhoG, a Rho GTPase related to Rac, modulates FA dynamics. When RhoG expression is silenced, FA are more stable and live longer, resulting in an increase in the number and size of adhesions, which are also more mature and fibrillar-like. Silencing RhoG also increases the number and thickness of stress fibers, which are sensitive to blebbistatin, suggesting contractility is increased. The molecular mechanism by which RhoG regulates adhesion turnover is yet to be characterized, but our results demonstrate that RhoG plays a role in the regulation of microtubule-mediated FA disassembly.


Subject(s)
Focal Adhesions/metabolism , Microtubules/metabolism , rho GTP-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Actomyosin/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Shape , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Gene Silencing , Humans , Pseudopodia/metabolism , Stress Fibers/metabolism
2.
Mol Biol Cell ; 28(13): 1768-1781, 2017 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28468978

ABSTRACT

Circular dorsal ruffles (CDRs) are actin-rich structures that form on the dorsal surface of many mammalian cells in response to growth factor stimulation. CDRs represent a unique type of structure that forms transiently and only once upon stimulation. The formation of CDRs involves a drastic rearrangement of the cytoskeleton, which is regulated by the Rho family of GTPases. So far, only Rac1 has been consistently associated with CDR formation, whereas the role of other GTPases in this process is either lacking or inconclusive. Here we show that RhoG and its exchange factor, Trio, play a role in the regulation of CDR dynamics, particularly by modulating their size. RhoG is activated by Trio downstream of PDGF in a PI3K- and Src-dependent manner. Silencing RhoG expression decreases the number of cells that form CDRs, as well as the area of the CDRs. The regulation of CDR area by RhoG is independent of Rac1 function. In addition, our results show the RhoG plays a role in the cellular functions associated with CDR formation, including macropinocytosis, receptor internalization, and cell migration. Taken together, our results reveal a novel role for RhoG in the regulation of CDRs and the cellular processes associated with their formation.


Subject(s)
Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors/metabolism , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , rho GTP-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Actins/metabolism , Animals , Cell Line , Cell Membrane Structures/metabolism , Cell Membrane Structures/physiology , Cell Movement/physiology , Cytoskeleton/metabolism , Humans , Microtubules/metabolism , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/metabolism , Pinocytosis/physiology , Rats , rac1 GTP-Binding Protein/metabolism
3.
Open Biol ; 7(3)2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28298310

ABSTRACT

Typical centrioles are made of microtubules organized in ninefold symmetry. Most animal somatic cells have two centrioles for normal cell division and function. These centrioles originate from the zygote, but because the oocyte does not provide any centrioles, it is surprising that the zygotes of many animals are thought to inherit only one centriole from the sperm. Recently, in the sperm of Drosophila melanogaster, we discovered a second centriolar structure, the proximal centriole-like structure (PCL), which functions in the zygote. Whether the sperm of other insects has a second centriolar structure is unknown. Here, we characterized spermiogenesis in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum Electron microscopy suggests that Tribolium has one microtubule-based centriole at the tip of the axoneme and a structure similar to the PCL, which lacks microtubules and lies in a cytoplasmic invagination of the nucleus. Immunostaining against the orthologue of the centriole/PCL protein, Ana1, also recognizes two centrioles near the nucleus during spermiogenesis: one that is microtubule-based at the tip of the axoneme, suggesting it is the centriole; and another that is more proximal and appears during early spermiogenesis, suggesting it is the PCL. Together, these findings suggest that Tribolium sperm has one microtubule-based centriole and one microtubule-lacking centriole.


Subject(s)
Centrioles/ultrastructure , Microtubules/ultrastructure , Spermatozoa/ultrastructure , Tribolium/ultrastructure , Animals , Centrioles/metabolism , Male , Microtubules/metabolism , Spermatids/metabolism , Spermatids/ultrastructure , Spermatogenesis , Spermatozoa/metabolism , Tribolium/physiology
4.
J Cell Sci ; 130(6): 1064-1077, 2017 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28202690

ABSTRACT

One of the hallmarks of cancer is the ability of tumor cells to invade surrounding tissues and metastasize. During metastasis, cancer cells degrade the extracellular matrix, which acts as a physical barrier, by developing specialized actin-rich membrane protrusion structures called invadopodia. The formation of invadopodia is regulated by Rho GTPases, a family of proteins that regulates the actin cytoskeleton. Here, we describe a novel role for RhoG in the regulation of invadopodia disassembly in human breast cancer cells. Our results show that RhoG and Rac1 have independent and opposite roles in the regulation of invadopodia dynamics. We also show that SGEF (also known as ARHGEF26) is the exchange factor responsible for the activation of RhoG during invadopodia disassembly. When the expression of either RhoG or SGEF is silenced, invadopodia are more stable and have a longer lifetime than in control cells. Our findings also demonstrate that RhoG and SGEF modulate the phosphorylation of paxillin, which plays a key role during invadopodia disassembly. In summary, we have identified a novel signaling pathway involving SGEF, RhoG and paxillin phosphorylation, which functions in the regulation of invadopodia disassembly in breast cancer cells.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Podosomes/metabolism , Signal Transduction , rho GTP-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Female , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Gene Silencing , Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors/metabolism , Humans , Models, Biological , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Phosphorylation , rac1 GTP-Binding Protein/metabolism , src-Family Kinases/metabolism
5.
Cell Biol Toxicol ; 30(4): 195-205, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24894427

ABSTRACT

Mustard gas is a simple molecule with a deadly past. First used as a chemical weapon in World War I, its simple formulation has raised concerns over its use by terrorist organizations and unstable governments. Mustard gas is a powerful vesicant and alkylating agent that causes painful blisters on epithelial surfaces and increases the incidence of cancer in those exposed. The mechanism of mustard gas toxicity and tumorigenesis is not well understood but is thought to be mediated by its ability to induce oxidative stress and DNA damage. Interestingly, several proteins that have been shown to either be targets of mustard gas or mediate mustard gas toxicity have also been shown to regulate centrosome duplication. Centrosomes are small nonmembrane-bound organelles that direct the segregation of chromosomes during mitosis through the formation of the bipolar mitotic spindle. Cells with more or less than two centrosomes during mitosis can segregate their chromosomes unequally, resulting in chromosome instability, a common phenotype of cancer cells. In our studies, we show that subtoxic levels of 2-chloroethyl ethylsulfide (2-CEES), a mustard gas analog, induce centrosome amplification and chromosome instability in cells, which may hasten the mutation rate necessary for tumorigenesis. These data may explain why those exposed to mustard gas exhibit higher incidences of cancer than unexposed individuals of the same cohort.


Subject(s)
Aneuploidy , Centrosome/drug effects , Chemical Warfare Agents/toxicity , Chromosomal Instability , Mustard Gas/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Survival/drug effects , Centrosome/physiology , Humans , Mice , Mustard Gas/toxicity , NIH 3T3 Cells
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...