Beyond appearance: An unusual manifestation of isolated oral secondary syphilis.

Syphilis is a sexually acquired chronic infection caused by Treponema pallidum and is characterized by a variety of clinical manifestations. The secondary stage of the disease results from the hematogenous and lymphatic dissemination of treponemes after a few weeks or months, and it is characterized by recurrent activity of the disease, with muco-cutaneous as well as systemic manifestations. Mucosal lesions range from small, superficial ulcers that resemble painless aphthae to large gray plaques, and they are generally associated with systemic manifestations of the disease. The exclusive asymptomatic oral localization not associated with general manifestations is uncommon but may actually be unrecognized and under-reported. We report a case of isolated oral manifestation as the unique presentation of secondary syphilis.

Cutaneous candidiasis caused by Candida albicans in a young non-immunosuppressed patient: an unusual presentation.

Candidiasis is a fungal infection caused by yeasts that belong to the genus Candida. There are over 20 species of Candida yeasts that can cause infection in humans, the most common of which is Candida albicans. Candida yeasts normally reside in the intestinal tract and can be found on mucous membranes and skin without causing infection. However, under immunocompromised conditions, Candida can cause significant infections in susceptible patients. Herein, we report a peculiar presentation of a C. albicans cutaneous infection in an immunocompetent young subject. This case widens our knowledge on the C. albicans infections both in terms of host susceptibility and cutaneous manifestations.

Comparison of patients' and providers' severity evaluation of oral mucosal conditions.

BACKGROUND: In dental diseases, significant discrepancies were observed in the oral health-related quality of life evaluation between patients and providers. Few studies have been performed specifically on the impact of oral mucosal diseases on patients' health. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the evaluation of the severity of oral mucosal conditions in providers and patients. METHODS: Patients with an oral mucosal condition were recruited at the oral health care unit of a dermatologic hospital. Severity was evaluated both by the physician and by the patient, using a global severity assessment score on a 5-point scale. The 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile was used to evaluate oral health-related quality of life, the 12-item General Health Questionnaire for psychologic problems, and the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale for alexithymia (ie, the difficulty in identifying and expressing feelings). RESULTS: Data were complete for 206 patients. The agreement between patients' and providers' evaluation was very low (Cohen κ = 0.18). Severity was particularly underestimated by the physician in patients with alexithymia (43% compared with 25% of patients with no alexithymia) and with psychologic problems (44% vs 25%). LIMITATIONS: Because of the high number of different conditions, and thus the small figures in each group, it was not possible to analyze the concordance between patient and provider in each single condition. CONCLUSION: Even in the severity assessment of his or her own disease, it is plausible that a patient does not provide a simple clinical evaluation, but includes subjective aspects. It is important for the physician to take into account the severity the patient perceives in making treatment decisions, and in evaluating clinical improvement.