Prevalence and risk factors for hypertensive crisis in a predominantly African American inner-city community.

PURPOSE: A 3-year case control study was conducted to determine the prevalence of hypertensive crisis and its subtypes, hypertensive emergency and hypertensive urgency. The secondary objectives were to identify risk factors for hypertensive emergencies and to determine the odds of developing acute target organ damage among predominantly African American patients with a confirmed diagnosis of hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using emergency department medical records, patients with a confirmed diagnosis of hypertension were identified. From the pool of hypertensive patients, cases and controls were selected and matched 1:1 for age, gender and race. Cases were hypertensive patients with hypertensive crisis, defined as BP ≥ 200/120 mmHg. Controls had a diagnosis of hypertension and BP < 200/120 mmHg. Cases and controls, as well as cases with hypertensive emergencies and hypertensive urgencies were compared based on important demographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: Almost 90% of study population were African Americans. The prevalence of hypertensive crisis was 11.4% and hypertensive emergencies was 3.2%. Hypertensive emergencies accounted for 28% of patients with crisis. The predictors for hypertensive emergencies were older age (p = .002), male gender (p < .007), anemia (p < .0001), history of coronary artery disease (p < .001), congestive heart failure (p < .001) and chronic renal insufficiency (p < .001). Having healthcare insurance and access to medical care did not reduce the odds of developing hypertensive emergencies. Race was not a significant risk factor in the progression from hypertensive crisis to hypertensive emergencies (p = .47). CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the high prevalence of hypertensive crisis and hypertensive emergencies in the predominantly African American urban population, which is 5 times the United States average. However, race is not a predictor of development of hypertensive emergencies and acute target organ damage in patients with already severely elevated blood pressure.

Hypertensive emergencies in diabetic patients from predominantly African American urban communities.

Aim: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for hypertensive emergencies in diabetic patients presenting with severely elevated blood pressure. Methods: Using electronic medical records, this study identified diabetic patients with hypertensive crisis who presented to the emergency department of Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, NJ from June 2013 to May 2016. Diabetic patients with hypertensive emergencies were compared with non-diabetic patients based on important demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Patients with diabetes accounted for 52.27% of all hypertensive emergencies during the study period. There were 264 diabetic patients with hypertensive emergencies and 519 diabetic patients with hypertensive urgencies. The majority of patients were African Americans (88.6%). The odds of hypertensive emergencies were strikingly higher in diabetic patients with hyperlipidemia (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.23-2.24), coronary artery disease (OR 2.95, 95% CI 2.15-4.05), congestive heart failure (OR 6.28, 95% CI 4.49-8.80), renal insufficiency (OR 2.84, 95% CI 2.10-3.86) and low hemoglobin (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.84-0.97). Acute or worsening heart failure was the most frequent acute target organ injury (49.6%) followed by non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (41.7%). Diabetic and non-diabetic patients had similar rates of target organ injuries. Conclusion: The development of hypertensive emergencies in patients with diabetes was not because of diabetes per se but because of coexisting highly elevated blood pressure. Tight blood pressure control may decrease the risk of hypertensive emergencies in this patient population.

Implementing a third-year emergency medicine medical student curriculum.

BACKGROUND: Emergency medicine (EM) is commonly introduced in the fourth year of medical school because of a perceived need to have more experienced students in the complex and dynamic environment of the emergency department. However, there is no evidence supporting the optimal time or duration for an EM rotation, and a number of institutions offer third-year rotations. OBJECTIVE: A recently published syllabus provides areas of knowledge, skills, and attitudes that third-year EM rotation directors can use to develop curricula. This article expands on that syllabus by providing a comprehensive curricular guide for the third-year medical student rotation with a focus on implementation. DISCUSSION: Included are consensus-derived learning objectives, discussion of educational methods, considerations for implementation, and information on feedback and evaluation as proposed by the Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine Third-Year Curriculum Work Group. External validation results, derived from a survey of third-year rotation directors, are provided in the form of a content validity index for each content area. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus-derived curricular guide can be used by faculty who are developing or revising a third-year EM medical student rotation and provide guidance for implementing this curriculum at their institution.

Are 2 smaller intravenous catheters as good as 1 larger intravenous catheter?

OBJECTIVE: Using Poiseuille's law and standardized gauge sizes, an 18-gauge (g) intravenous catheter (IV) should be 2.5 times faster than a 20-g IV, but this is not borne out by observation, in vitro testing, and manufacturer's data. Our objective was to determine if the infusion rate of a single 18-g IV was equivalent to the infusion rate of two 20-g IVs. METHODS: This was a prospective study in healthy adult volunteers. Subjects simultaneously received 500 mL of normal saline via an 18-g IV in one arm and 500 mL of normal saline via two 20-g IVs in the other arm. We measured the rates of fluid administration. Paired Student's t test was used for comparison of the 2 arms of the study. We estimated that 18 trials were needed in sample size analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen trials were completed. The mean infusion rate for a single 18-g 500-mL IV administration was 35.6 mL/min (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.3-40.8), with manufacturer's rating being 105 mL/min. The mean infusion rate for two 20-g IVs was 41.3 mL/min (95% CI, 36.1-46.4), with manufacturer's rating being 120 mL/min. The rate of infusion via two 20-g IVs were statistically significantly faster than the single 18-g IV, with a mean difference in flow rate of 5.7 mL/min (95% CI, 1.3-10; P = .026). CONCLUSION: In healthy volunteers, administration of intravenous fluids through two 20-g IVs is faster than a single 18-g IV, although both approaches are markedly slower than the manufacturer's estimates.

Effect of an educational video on emergency department patient stroke knowledge.

The purpose of this study was to explore whether passive watching of a stroke videotape in the Emergency Department waiting room could be an effective method for patient education. The setting was an urban, inner city teaching hospital. After providing informed consent, subjects were randomized into two arms: those watching a 12-min educational video on stroke developed by the American Stroke Association (video group) and those not undergoing an intervention (control group). Both groups were administered a 13-question quiz covering different stroke-related issues, but only the video group received this same test again after the completion of the educational program. Those enrolled were contacted after 1 month to determine knowledge retention via the same test. Immediately after watching the educational program, participants demonstrated improved knowledge of stroke-related questions, with an increase of test scores from 6.7 +/- 2.5 to 9.5 +/- 2.6 (p < 0.01). Even at the 1-month follow-up, the video group had significantly higher test scores than the control group. A stroke educational videotape improves the knowledge of this dangerous disease and may be a valuable and relatively low-cost tool for focused patient education in the Emergency Department waiting room.

Gender trends in emergency medicine publications.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the number of women entering the field of emergency medicine (EM) has increased. OBJECTIVES: To determine if authorship in EM publications has increased in parallel with this trend. METHODS: The gender of first and last authors of EM articles in Academic Emergency Medicine, American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Annals of Emergency Medicine, and Journal of Emergency Medicine were examined. The authors reviewed articles from 1985, 1995, and 2005 for American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Annals of Emergency Medicine, and Journal of Emergency Medicine and from 1999 and 2005 for Academic Emergency Medicine. The primary outcomes were the proportions of female authors. RESULTS: A total of 2,016 articles were reviewed. Overall, 18% of first and last authors were female. Respectively, for 1985, 1995, 1999, and 2005, the proportions of female first authors were 9%, 15%, 19%, and 24%; the proportions of female last authors were 9%, 18%, 19%, and 22%. The trend of increases in female authorship was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Although female authorship remains a minority in EM publications, it has increased significantly in parallel with increases in female participation in EM.