Nothing About Us Without Us: Improving Representation of Disability in Medical School Curriculum Through Explicit Inclusion.

ABSTRACT: Medical school curricula across the United States fail to adequately prepare students to provide high-quality care to and advocate for patients with disabilities. To address this shortcoming at one large, urban medical school, the Curriculum Committee at Sidney Kimmel Medical College (SKMC) formed a taskforce of students and faculty to evaluate the degree and quality of disability representation in its undergraduate medical education (UME) curriculum. Taskforce members solicited input from five community members in various fields of disability advocacy to craft recommendations that reflected this community's vision for disability education in UME. Community partners suggested areas of focus including clinical skills, accessibility of healthcare facilities, awareness of intersectionality with other identities, acknowledgment of bias, and respect for the patient's autonomy via their "right to risk." The taskforce report to the Curriculum Committee included 9 recommendations for curricular revision based on community partner suggestions, 6 of which were accepted and are being implemented into the curricular content for the class of 2026 and beyond. This novel approach to implementing curricular change could encourage other medical schools to evaluate their own curricula through the lens of disability and prompt curricular revision with the input of community partners with disabilities, students, and, faculty.

Integrating Choosing Wisely, Value-Based Care Principles, Into Undergraduate Medical Education: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare spending represents a large portion of the GDP of the United States. Value-based care (VBC) seeks to decrease waste in health care spending, yet this concept is insufficiently taught to medical students. The Choosing Wisely Students and Trainees Advocating for Resource Stewardship (STARS) campaign promotes initiatives that integrate knowledge of VBC into undergraduate medical education (UME). This study sought to determine the most effective strategy to educate medical students on key principles of VBC as taught by the STARS campaign. METHODS: Choosing Wisely principles were incorporated into the UME curriculum of an academic medical institution via the creation of eight new learning objectives (LOs) for case-based learning (CBL) sessions and lectures. Medical students completed an annual 10-question survey from 2019 to 2022 and 10 formal examination questions during the preclinical (years 1 and 2) curriculum after exposure to varying quantities of LOs. Pearson correlation, chi-square, and logistic regression were employed to determine the association between increased LOs in the curriculum and (1) campaign awareness and (2) knowledge of VBC principles. RESULTS: A total of 700 survey responses over a four-year period (2019 to 2022) were analyzed. Student awareness of the campaign and knowledge of VBC principles increased year over year during the survey period (39% to 92% and 64% to 74%, respectively). There were significant associations between increased LOs in the curriculum and (1) campaign awareness (0.828, p<0.0001) and (2) knowledge of VBC principles (0.934, p<0.001). Students also performed well on formal examination questions related to VBC principles (mean: 81.5% and mean discrimination index: 0.18). CONCLUSION: Integration of VBC-focused LOs is significantly associated with awareness of the Choosing Wisely STARS campaign and knowledge of VBC principles taught by the campaign. Collaborative initiatives to increase exposure to VBC education may improve students' knowledge of these principles during medical school.

Making decisions "in the dark": Learning through uncertainty in clinical practice during Covid-19.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore how decision making and informal and incidental learning (IIL) emerged in the clinical learning environment (CLE) during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. The authors' specific interest was to better understand the IIL that took place among frontline physicians who had to navigate a CLE replete with uncertainty and complexity with the future goal of creating experiences for medical students that would simulate IIL and use uncertainty as a catalyst for learning. Method: Using a modified constructivist, grounded theory approach, we describe physicians' IIL while working during times of heightened uncertainty. Using the critical incident technique, we conducted 45-min virtual interviews with seven emergency department (ED) and five intensive care unit (ICU) physicians, who worked during the height of the pandemic. The authors transcribed and restoried each interview before applying inductive, comparative analysis to identify patterns, assertions, and organizing themes. Results: Findings showed that the burden of decision making for physicians was influenced by the physical, emotional, relational, and situational context of the CLE. The themes that emerged for decision making and IIL were interdependent. Prominent among the patterns for decision making were ways to simplify the problem by applying prior knowledge, using pattern recognition, and cross-checking with team members. Patterns for IIL emerged through trial and error, which included thoughtful experimentation, consulting alternative sources of information, accumulating knowledge, and "poking at the periphery" of clinical practice. Conclusions: Complexity and uncertainty are rife in clinical practice and this study made visible decision-making patterns and IIL approaches that can be built into formal curricula. Making implicit uncertainty explicit by recognizing it, naming it, and practicing navigating it may better prepare learners for the uncertainty posed by the clinical practice environment.

Navigating Uncertainty in Clinical Practice: A Workshop to Prepare Medical Students to Problem-Solve During Complex Clinical Challenges.

Introduction: Uncertainty is an inherent part of medicine. Prior work has trained medical students to better communicate diagnostic uncertainty; however, this work touches on only one aspect of the uncertainty students will face in practice. We developed a session to provide them with a taxonomy for categorizing the various types of uncertainty, as well as a framework to apply when navigating uncertainty during clinical challenges. These tools can help students make sense of uncertainty and determine actions in a complex health system. Methods: We designed a virtual workshop for third-year medical students at the end of their core clerkships. It included a didactic session followed by a small-group immersive unfolding case experience with several challenge points during which we tasked students with applying the framework, classifying the uncertainty domain, and discussing how they would problem-solve each scenario. Results: We conducted the workshop with 128 third-year medical students. We collected data through an anonymous postsession survey (86% response rate; 110 of 128 students). Most found the workshop useful (64%; 54 of 85), and a large number found the framework helpful in appraising uncertainty (47%; 42 of 89). A majority felt their perspectives on uncertainty changed after the workshop (66%; 73 of 110). Students integrated prior health systems science knowledge in their strategies to problem-solve each challenge. Discussion: This session provides a novel application of a sense-making framework and taxonomy for medical students to classify uncertainty. It offers a simple, low-cost, interactive, virtual activity that can be implemented at other institutions.

Exposing the disability-related hidden curriculum in case-based learning: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: People with disabilities face significant health disparities. Studies show that healthcare professionals harbor negative attitudes towards disability, compromising the quality of care. These attitudes, in unwritten, unofficial, and even unintended ways can be passed from providers to learners in the medical education setting. OBJECTIVE: Using a Critical Disability Studies (CDS) paradigm, the authors uncovered the disability-related hidden curriculum within Case-Based Learning (CBL) and proposed guidelines for promoting a disability-conscious medical education that resists ableism. METHODS: The study team conducted a qualitative analysis of all CBL cases from the pre-clerkship curriculum (n = 53) at Sidney Kimmel Medical College. The authors employed a directed content analysis approach to develop a codebook based on case examination, literature review, and CDS concepts. Two researchers coded all cases and assessed intercoder reliability. The results informed the development of an explanatory model. RESULTS: Only four of 53 cases overtly mentioned disability, none of which defined disability according to CDS. Coding did not identify content challenging stereotypical views of disability. Additionally, two cases included content fueling negative attitudes of disability. CONCLUSION: By inadequately addressing disability from a CDS perspective, harmful assumptions of disability may go unchallenged, driving a hidden curriculum within CBL. This phenomenon leaves medical students ill-prepared to care for people with disabilities and creates physicians ill-equipped to teach the next generation. Since many health professions utilize CBL to educate students, these cases provide an untapped opportunity to resist ableism and better prepare students to address the negative attitudes driving health disparities experienced by people with disabilities.

The Longitudinal and Vertical Integration of Health Systems Science in an Undergraduate Medical Education Program: A Means to Support "Curricular Elasticity".

Although health systems science (HSS) has become increasingly included as requisite curricular content in undergraduate medical education (UME), educators have many implementation options for integrating HSS content into medical school training. Learning from medical schools' authentic experiences and lessons learned for the successful and sustainable implementation of HSS would be valuable. We share our experience with the longitudinal and vertical integration of HSS at the Sidney Kimmel Medical College (SKMC) at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia over the past six years. We posit that our approach to curricular design has afforded us the "curricular elasticity" needed to keep our educational program current and flexible in the rapidly changing healthcare and geopolitical landscape.

Practical tips for moving your patient panel online.

Patient panels are an inspiring, highly rated educational tool to complement course goals and objectives for students in medical education programs. The COVID-19 pandemic brought challenges on the ability to successfully host in-person patient panels. These challenges resulted in the need to pivot in-person patient panels to online platforms, while still ensuring the quality and intimacy of patient narratives. In this 12 tips article, we share lessons learned in transitioning patient panels in our health systems science curriculum to an online experience for students enrolled in a pre-clinical medical education program.

A Cautionary Tale: Exploring Stakeholder Emotions During Curricular Change Using Group Concept Mapping.

PhenomenonCurricular change is essential but challenging. Change efforts often struggle and some fail due to well-articulated challenges as well as other barriers less understood. The curricular change literature characterizes the organizational and operational features of successful change yet virtually ignores stakeholder emotions. A deeper understanding of these emotional responses during the change process could enhance participant and organizational well-being and support change success. Approach In 2019, data were collected at one large North American medical school using group concept mapping methodology, an asynchronous mixed methods approach. We sought to generate themes characterizing the emotional responses of faculty, administrative staff, and students across multiple stakeholder groups participating in the new and traditional (legacy) curricula 27 months after curricular change initiation. Participants brainstormed, sorted, and rated statements on emotional responses. Rating participants rated each statement using a Likert scale from 1 (does not resonate) to 4 (very strongly resonates) according to this prompt: "This emotional response resonates with my emotional experience during the curricular change." Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analyses were used to generate emotional profiles and compare them across stakeholders. Findings Of 335 stakeholders invited, 123 contributed to brainstorming (36.7%), 153 completed rating (45.7%) and 33 completed sorting (9.9%). Participants generated six themes of emotional responses to curricular change: enthusiastic, apprehensive, overwhelmed, missed opportunities, uncertain, and abandoned. The enthusiastic theme overall had the highest mean statement ratings while the abandoned theme had the lowest. Demographic subgroup analysis revealed new curriculum students (Class of 2021) were most enthusiastic while legacy curriculum students (Class of 2020) were more likely to feel abandoned. Overall, faculty and administrative staff were more enthusiastic than students whereas students rated the five other themes higher than faculty and administrative staff. InsightsCurricular change is emotionally taxing. Students in both curricula experienced greater uncertainty, apprehension, sense of missed opportunities, and feeling overwhelmed than did faculty and administrative staff. Legacy curriculum students rated statements in the abandoned cluster highest while new curriculum students rated statements in the enthusiastic cluster highest. Given the ubiquity of curricular change which often includes a legacy cohort, medical schools embarking on this journey must carefully attend to the varied emotional responses of their different stakeholder groups. The very activities recommended by organizational change models used in medical education, such as communicating wins early and often, could alienate legacy students, creating emotional polarization. These findings suggest that tailored communication strategies are necessary during change implementation to optimize success.

Intolerance of Uncertainty and Self-Compassion in Medical Students: Is There a Relationship and Why Should We Care?

Managing the uncertainty of clinical practice represents a significant source of stress for clinicians, including medical students transitioning into the clinical workplace. Self-compassion, a strategy to better cope with stress and burnout, may represent a skill that can be leveraged to better prepare learners for the uncertainty inherent in clinical practice. A negative correlation between intolerance of uncertainty and self-compassion has been demonstrated in undergraduate students and in the general population. An examination of this relationship in medical students may help inform future curricular development for addressing burnout in undergraduate medical education. We electronically administered the Intolerance of Uncertainty Short Scale and the Self-Compassion Short Form to 273 third-year medical students from a single institution and analyzed data via regression. A significant negative correlation was found between intolerance of uncertainty and self-compassion (p < 0.0001). Students with higher levels of self-compassion showed lower levels of intolerance of uncertainty. This is consistent with findings in other populations. Our findings offer a starting point for designing training experiences that strengthen student self-compassion to enhance their ability to reconcile the uncertainty they will encounter in clinical practice.

Informal and Incidental Learning in the Clinical Learning Environment: Learning Through Complexity and Uncertainty During COVID-19.

In the time of the COVID-19 pandemic, where clinical environments are plagued by both uncertainty and complexity, the importance of the informal and social aspects of learning among health care teams cannot be exaggerated. While there have been attempts to better understand the nuances of informal learning in the clinical environment through descriptions of the tacit or hidden curriculum, incidental learning in medical education has only been partially captured in the research. Understood through concepts borrowed from the Cynefin conceptual framework for sensemaking, the early stages of the pandemic immersed clinical teams in complex and chaotic situations where there was no immediately apparent relationship between cause and effect. Health care teams had to act quickly amidst the chaos: they had to first act, make sense of, and respond with intentionality. Informal and incidental learning (IIL) emerged as a byproduct of acting with the tools and knowledge available in the moment. To integrate the informal, sometimes haphazard nature of emergence among health care teams, educators require an understanding of IIL. This understanding can help medical educators prepare health professions learners for the cognitive dissonance that accompanies uncertainty in clinical practice. The authors introduce IIL as an explanatory framework to describe how teams navigate complexity in the clinical learning environment and to better inform curricular development for health professions training that prepares learners for uncertainty. While further research in IIL is needed to illuminate tacit knowledge that makes learning explicit for all audiences in the health professions, there are opportunities to cultivate learners' skills in formal curricula through various learning interventions to prime them for IIL when they enter complex clinical learning environments.

Curriculum Development by Design Thinking: Analyzing a Program for Social Determinants of Health Screening by Pre-Clerkship Medical Students.

PROBLEM: Health systems science (HSS) curricula in medical schools facilitate an understanding of social determinants of health (SDOH) and their impact on health outcomes. After implementation of an experiential, patient-centered program based around SDOH screening, however, our medical college noted poor student receptivity and engagement. In order to improve the program, we chose a design thinking approach based on the perceived value of actively engaging learners in the design of education. The role of design thinking in curricular quality improvement, however, remains unclear. INTERVENTION: We sought to determine if a current educational model for SDOH screening could be improved by reforming the curriculum using a design thinking workshop involving student and faculty stakeholders. CONTEXT: The current study is a retrospective analysis of first-year medical student, end-of-year evaluations of the Clinical Experience (CE) program at the Sidney Kimmel Medical College before (2018-19) and after (2019-20) implementation of the design thinking workshop and subsequent curriculum changes. IMPACT: Overall positive results significantly increased across all survey questions after the curricular intervention (p < 0.01), indicating increased student satisfaction with the revised curriculum. LESSONS LEARNED: Few studies assess outcomes of design thinking-driven curricular changes. The current study of an SDOH screening program details the implementation of initiatives that originated from a design thinking sprint and assesses program evaluations following these curricular changes. Most of the well-received curricular changes concerned improvements in student training, patient screening and follow-up, and the leveraging of existing technology. The study reinforces the importance of co-creation among stakeholders when redesigning medical curricula.

I Don't Have a Diagnosis for You: Preparing Medical Students to Communicate Diagnostic Uncertainty in the Emergency Department.

INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic uncertainty abounds in medicine, and communication of that uncertainty is critical to the delivery of high-quality patient care. While there has been training in communicating diagnostic uncertainty directed towards residents, a gap remains in preparing medical students to understand and communicate diagnostic uncertainty. We developed a session to introduce medical students to diagnostic uncertainty and to practice communicating uncertainty using a checklist during role-play patient conversations. METHODS: This virtual session was conducted for third-year medical students at the conclusion of their core clerkships. It consisted of prework, didactic lecture, peer role-play, and debriefing. The prework included reflection prompts and an interactive online module. The role-play featured a patient complaining of abdominal pain being discharged from the emergency department without a confirmed diagnosis. Students participated in the role of patient, provider, or observer. RESULTS: Data from an anonymous postsession survey (76% response rate; 202 of 265 students) indicated that most students (82%; 152 of 185) felt more comfortable communicating diagnostic uncertainty after the session. A majority (83%; 166 of 201) indicated the session was useful, and most (81%; 149 of 184) indicated it should be included in the curriculum. DISCUSSION: This virtual session requires few facilitators; has peer role-play, eliminating the need for standardized patients; and is adaptable for in-person teaching. As its goal was to introduce an approach to communicating diagnostic uncertainty, not achieve mastery, students were not individually assessed for proficiency using the Uncertainty Communication Checklist. Students felt the session intervention was valuable.

Virtual Community Health Workers: Approaches to Patient Outreach During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, community health workers (CHWs) in our health system screened patients in-person for social determinants of health and connected them to community resources. However, when our CHWs were required to work remotely from home due to the pandemic, the best platform to optimize contacting these patients was unknown. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of three outgoing phone call approaches (*67, Google Voice®, and Doximity Dialer®) in successfully contacting patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis comparing reach rates across the three outgoing call approaches. RESULTS: Reach rates were highest when Doximity Dialer was used (64.0%, 95% CI: 58.8-69.0) compared with *67 (40.8%, 95% CI: 30.8-51.6) or Google Voice (53.2%, 95% CI: 48.4-57.8) in this analysis of 1,144 outreach calls. CONCLUSION: Due to higher reach rates, we recommend Doximity Dialer for phone-based outreach to patients. Additional research to improve the efficacy of remote outreach is warranted.

Towards a medical school curriculum for uncertainty in clinical practice.

Uncertainty abounds in the clinical environment. Medical students, however, are not explicitly prepared for situations of uncertainty in clinical practice, which can cause anxiety and impact well-being. To address this gap, we sought to capture how students felt in various clinical scenarios and identify programs they found helpful as they worked through uncertainty in their clerkships to better inform curriculum that prepares them to acknowledge and navigate this uncertainty. This is an observational cross-sectional study of third-year medical students surveyed at the end of core clerkships. The survey consisted of the General Self-Efficacy (GSE) Scale and Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS). Items asked students to rate preparedness, confidence, and comfort with uncertainty in clinical practice. Items on curricular programs asked students to identify training that prepared them for uncertainty in clerkships, and examined correlations with specific clinical practice uncertainty domains (CPUDs). Spearman's rank-order correlation, Chi-Square, and ANOVA were used to analyze quantitative data. Open responses were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's Framework. Response rate was 98.9% (287/290). GSE was inversely correlated with IUS (p < 0.001). GSE was positively correlated with all CPUDs (p < 0.005). IUS had an inverse correlation with all CPUDs (p < 0.005). Pedagogies with statistically-significant relationships with preparing students for uncertainty, communicating and building relationships with patients during times of uncertainty, and overall well-being included: team debriefs, role plays, case- and team-based learning, story slams, and sharing narratives with peers and faculty (p < 0.05). Qualitatively, students appreciated storytelling, role-modeling of communication strategies, debriefing, and simulations. Strategically immersing specific educational formats into formal curriculum may help cultivate skills needed to prepare students for uncertainty. Clinical debriefs, interprofessional role plays, simulations, communications skills training, instructor emotional vulnerability, storytelling, and peer-to-peer conversations may have the most impact. Further study is required to evaluate their longitudinal impact.

In Search of Medical Professionalism Research: Preliminary Results from a Review of Widely Read Medical Journals.

INTRODUCTION: Professionalism is a core concept in medicine. The extent to which knowledge about professionalism is anchored in empirical research is unknown. Understanding the current state of research is necessary to identify significant gaps and create a road map for future professionalism efforts. The authors conducted an exploratory literature review to characterize professionalism research published in widely read medical journals, identify knowledge gaps, and describe the sources of funding for the identified studies. METHODS: The authors focused on Medline's Abridged Index Medicus and 4 core Medline education-oriented journal and developed a search filter using text words found in the article title or abstract addressing professionalism. Articles were further filtered to include those indicating a research focus. RESULTS: The search strategy resulted in 461 professionalism research articles for analysis. Articles were divided into themes of education (n = 212, 45.9%), performance (n = 83, 18%), measurement development (n = 13, 2.8%), remediation (n = 53, 11.5%), and well-being (n = 100, 21.6%). There were 36 studies from 1980 to 2002 (Era 1: before publication of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies) and 425 from 2003 to 17 (Era 2: after Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education publication of competencies). Professionalism education was the most common topic area, and most studies were from single institutions with results based on convenience samples. Most studies received no funding or were funded by the authors' own institution. DISCUSSION: Little empirical research is available on professionalism in widely read medical journals. There has been limited external research funding available to study this topic. CONCLUSION: More investment in high quality professionalism research is justified and should be encouraged.

Medical Student Attitudes toward USMLE Step 1 and Health Systems Science - A Multi-Institutional Survey.

Phenomenon: Because of its importance in residency selection, the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 occupies a critical position in medical education, stimulating national debate about appropriate score use, equitable selection criteria, and the goals of undergraduate medical education. Yet, student perspectives on these issues and their implications for engagement with health systems science-related curricular content are relatively underexplored. Approach: We conducted an online survey of medical students at 19 American allopathic medical schools from March-July, 2019. Survey items were designed to elicit student opinions on the Step 1 examination and the impact of the examination on their engagement with new, non-test curricular content related to health systems science. Findings: A total of 2856 students participated in the survey, representing 23.5% of those invited. While 87% of students agreed that doing well on the Step 1 exam was their top priority, 56% disagreed that studying for Step 1 had a positive impact on engagement in the medical school curriculum. Eighty-two percent of students disagreed that Step 1 scores should be the top item residency programs use to offer interviews. When asked whether Step 1 results should be reported pass/fail with no numeric score, 55% of students agreed, while 33% disagreed. The majority of medical students agreed that health systems science topics were important but disagreed that studying for Step 1 helped learn this content. Students reported being more motivated to study a topic if it was on the exam, part of a course grade, prioritized by residency program directors, or if it would make them a better physician in the future. Insights: These results confirm the primacy of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 exam in preclinical medical education and demonstrate the need to balance the objectives of medical licensure and residency selection with the goals of the broader medical profession. The survey responses suggest several potential solutions to increase student engagement in health systems science curricula which may be especially important after Step 1 examination results are reported as pass/fail.