ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Melatonin preparations are emerging first-line pharmacotherapy for insomnia in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but quality, formulation, consistency, dosing, and limited long-term safety data are of concern. The recent approval of pediatric-appropriate prolonged-release melatonin (Ped-PRM) addresses these aspects. AREAS COVERED: A systematic search of PubMed and web of science for prospective, randomized, and controlled trials (RCTs) of melatonin preparations vs placebo in children and adolescents with ASD and the European public assessment report on Ped-PRM was conducted. EXPERT OPINION: Melatonin is rapidly absorbed and undergoes first pass hepatic metabolism by cytochrome CYP1A2; over 80% is excreted in the urine as 6-sulfatoxymelatonin (inactive). Immediate-release melatonin (IRM) is short-acting (3-4 h), whereas PRM provides therapeutic levels throughout the night. Drugs interacting with CYP1A2 are likely to slow-down melatonin metabolism. High variability in bioavailability among subjects calls for dose optimization. Melatonin was essentially safe for short-term use (up to 3 months). Long-term data available for Ped-PRM demonstrate fatigue (6.3%), somnolence (6.3%), and mood swings (4.2%) with no evidence of effects on height, BMI, or pubertal development, tolerance or withdrawal effects following long-term use of this product. Studies on long-term safety of IRM and oversight of melatonin supplement manufacture are warranted.
Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder , Melatonin , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Adolescent , Autism Spectrum Disorder/drug therapy , Child , Delayed-Action Preparations/therapeutic use , Drug Interactions , Humans , Melatonin/adverse effects , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: A recent 3-month double-blind, placebo-controlled study demonstrated efficacy and safety of pediatric prolonged-release melatonin (PedPRM) for insomnia in children with autism spectrum disorder. This study examined the long-term effects of PedPRM treatment on sleep, growth, body mass index, and pubertal development. METHOD: Eighty children and adolescents (2-17.5 years of age; 96% with autism spectrum disorder) who completed the double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were given 2 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg PedPRM nightly up to 104 weeks, followed by a 2-week placebo period to assess withdrawal effects. RESULTS: Improvements in child sleep disturbance and caregiver satisfaction with child sleep patterns, quality of sleep, and quality of life were maintained throughout the 104-week treatment period (p < .001 versus baseline for all). During the 2-week withdrawal placebo period, measures declined compared with the treatment period but were still improved compared with baseline. PedPRM was generally safe; the most frequent treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (6.3%), somnolence (6.3%), and mood swings (4.2%). Changes in mean weight, height, body mass index, and pubertal status (Tanner staging done by a physician) were within normal ranges for age with no evidence of delay in body mass index or pubertal development. CONCLUSION: Nightly PedPRM at optimal dose (2, 5, or 10 mg nightly) is safe and effective for long-term treatment in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder and insomnia. There were no observed detrimental effects on children's growth and pubertal development and no withdrawal or safety issues related to the use or discontinuation of the drug. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Efficacy and Safety of Circadin in the Treatment of Sleep Disturbances in Children With Neurodevelopment Disabilities; https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT01906866.
Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder , Melatonin , Adolescent , Aged, 80 and over , Autism Spectrum Disorder/drug therapy , Child , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Melatonin/adverse effects , Puberty , Quality of Life , Sleep , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
A randomized, 13-weeks, placebo-controlled double-blind study in 125 subjects aged 2-17.5 years with Autism Spectrum Disorder or Smith-Magenis syndrome and insomnia demonstrated efficacy and safety of easily-swallowed prolonged-release melatonin mini-tablets (PedPRM; 2-5 mg) in improving sleep duration and onset. Treatment effects on child behavior and caregiver's quality of life were evaluated. PedPRM treatment resulted in significant improvement in externalizing but not internalizing behavior (Strengths and Difficulties questionnaire; SDQ) compared to placebo (p = 0.021) with clinically-relevant improvements in 53.7% of PedPRM-treated versus 27.6% of placebo-treated subjects (p = 0.008). Caregivers' quality of life also improved with PedPRM versus placebo (p = 0.010) and correlated with the change in total SDQ (p = 0.0005). PedPRM alleviates insomnia-related difficulties, particularly externalizing behavior in the children, subsequently improving caregivers' quality of life.
Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder/drug therapy , Caregivers , Central Nervous System Depressants/therapeutic use , Child Behavior/drug effects , Melatonin/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Sleep/drug effects , Adolescent , Central Nervous System Depressants/administration & dosage , Central Nervous System Depressants/pharmacology , Child , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Melatonin/administration & dosage , Melatonin/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Objective: A recent double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study demonstrated 3-month efficacy and safety of a novel pediatric-appropriate prolonged-release melatonin (PedPRM) for insomnia in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and neurogenetic disorders (NGD) with/without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder comorbidity. Long-term efficacy and safety of PedPRM treatment was studied. Methods: A prospective, open-label efficacy and safety follow-up of nightly 2, 5, or 10 mg PedPRM in subjects who completed the 13-week double-blind trial (51 PedPRM; 44 placebo). Measures included caregiver-reported Sleep and Nap Diary, Composite Sleep Disturbance Index (CSDI), caregiver's Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and quality of life (WHO-5 Well-Being Index). Results: Ninety-five subjects (74.7% males; mean [standard deviation] age, 9 [4.24]; range, 2-17.5 years) received PedPRM (2/5 mg) according to the double-blind phase dose, for 39 weeks with optional dose adjustment (2, 5, or 10 mg/day) after the first 13 weeks. After 52 weeks of continuous treatment (PedPRM-randomized group) subjects slept (mean [SE]) 62.08 (21.5) minutes longer (p = 0.007); fell asleep 48.6 (10.2) minutes faster (p < 0.001); had 89.1 (25.5) minutes longer uninterrupted sleep episodes (p = 0.001); 0.41 (0.12) less nightly awakenings (>50% decrease; p = 0.001); and better sleep quality (p < 0.001) compared with baseline. The placebo-randomized group also improved with PedPRM. Altogether, by the end of 39-week follow-up, regardless of randomization assignment, 55/72 (76%) of completers achieved overall improvement of ≥1 hour in total sleep time (TST), sleep latency or both, over baseline, with no evidence of decreased efficacy. In parallel, CSDI child sleep disturbance and caregivers' satisfaction of their child's sleep patterns (p < 0.001 for both), PSQI global (p < 0.001), and WHO-5 (p = 0.001) improved in statistically significant and clinically relevant manner (n = 72) compared with baseline. PedPRM was generally safe; most frequent treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (5.3%) and mood swings (3.2% of patients). Conclusion: PedPRM, an easily swallowed formulation shown to be efficacious versus placebo, is an efficacious and safe option for long-term treatment (up to 52 weeks reported here) of children with ASD and NGD who suffer from insomnia and subsequently improves caregivers' quality of life.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Autism Spectrum Disorder , Communication Disorders , Melatonin , Quality of Life , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/complications , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/complications , Autism Spectrum Disorder/epidemiology , Central Nervous System Depressants/administration & dosage , Central Nervous System Depressants/adverse effects , Child , Communication Disorders/complications , Communication Disorders/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Delayed-Action Preparations/administration & dosage , Delayed-Action Preparations/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Monitoring , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Melatonin/administration & dosage , Melatonin/adverse effects , Polysomnography/methods , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/diagnosis , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/etiology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/psychology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
In mammals, a central circadian clock, located in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the hypothalamus, tunes the innate circadian physiological rhythms to the ambient 24 h light-dark cycle to invigorate and optimize the internal temporal order. The SCN-activated, light-inhibited production of melatonin conveys the message of darkness to the clock and induces night-state physiological functions, for example, sleep/wake blood pressure and metabolism. Clinically meaningful effects of melatonin treatment have been demonstrated in placebo-controlled trials in humans, particularly in disorders associated with diminished or misaligned melatonin rhythms, for example, circadian rhythm-related sleep disorders, jet lag and shift work, insomnia in children with neurodevelopmental disorders, poor (non-restorative) sleep quality, non-dipping nocturnal blood pressure (nocturnal hypertension) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). The diminished production of melatonin at the very early stages of AD, the role of melatonin in the restorative value of sleep (perceived sleep quality) and its sleep-anticipating effects resulting in attenuated activation of certain brain networks are gaining a new perspective as the role of poor sleep quality in the build-up of ß amyloid, particularly in the precuneus, is unravelled. As a result of the recently discovered relationship between circadian clock, sleep and neurodegeneration, new prospects of using melatonin for early intervention, to promote healthy physical and mental ageing, are of prime interest in view of the emerging link to the aetiology of Alzheimer's disease. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Recent Developments in Research of Melatonin and its Potential Therapeutic Applications. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v175.16/issuetoc.
Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Melatonin/physiology , Sleep/physiology , Animals , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/metabolism , Humans , Melatonin/therapeutic use , Nervous System Diseases/drug therapy , Nervous System Diseases/metabolism , Sleep Wake Disorders/drug therapy , Sleep Wake Disorders/metabolismABSTRACT
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive deficits, deposition of amyloid-ß (Aß) plaques, intracellular neurofibrillary tangles, and neuronal cell death. Neuroinflammation is commonly believed to participate in AD pathogenesis. CD44 is an inflammation-related gene encoding a widely-distributed family of alternatively spliced cell surface glycoproteins that have been implicated in inflammation, metastases, and inflammation-linked neuronal injuries. Here we investigated the expression patterns of CD44S (which does not contain any alternative exon) and CD44 splice variants in postmortem hippocampal samples from AD patients and matched non-AD controls. The expression of CD44S and CD44 splice variants CD44V3, CD44V6, and CD44V10 was significantly higher in AD patients compared to non-AD controls. Immunohistochemistry of human hippocampal sections revealed that CD44S differentially localized to neuritic plaques and astrocytes, whereas CD44V3, CD44V6, and CD44V10 expression was mostly neuronal. Consistent with these findings, we found that the expression of CD44V6 and CD44V10 was induced by Aß peptide in neuroblastoma cells and primary neurons. Furthermore, in loss of function studies we found that both CD44V10-specific siRNA and CD44V10 antibody protected neuronal cells from Aß-induced toxicity, suggesting a causal relationship between CD44V10 and neuronal cell death. These data indicate that certain CD44 splice variants contribute to AD pathology and that CD44V10 inhibition may serve as a new neuroprotective treatment strategy for this disease.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/genetics , Alzheimer Disease/pathology , Hippocampus/metabolism , Hyaluronan Receptors/genetics , Hyaluronan Receptors/metabolism , Protein Isoforms/metabolism , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amyloid beta-Peptides/pharmacology , Animals , Case-Control Studies , Caspase 3/metabolism , Cell Death/drug effects , Cell Line, Transformed , Cerebral Cortex/cytology , Female , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Humans , Male , Mice , Neuroblastoma/pathology , Neurons/metabolism , Peptide Fragments/pharmacology , Protein Isoforms/genetics , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , RNA, Small Interfering/metabolism , Rats , Time FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Melatonin, secreted by the pineal gland during the night phase, is a regulator of the biological clock and sleep tendency. Totally blind subjects frequently report severe, periodic sleep problems, with 50%-75% of cases displaying non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder (N24HSWD) due to inability to synchronize with the environmental day-night cycle. Melatonin immediate-release preparations are reportedly effective in N24HSWD. Here, we studied the efficacy and safety of prolonged-release melatonin (PRM), a registered drug for insomnia, for sleep disorders in totally blind subjects living in normal social environments. The primary endpoint was demonstration of clinically meaningful effects on sleep duration (upper confidence interval [CI] limit >20 minutes whether significant or not) to allow early decision-making on further drug development in this indication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registry - NCT00972075. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled proof-of-principle study, 13 totally blind subjects had 2 weeks' placebo run-in, 6 weeks' randomized (1:1) PRM (Circadin(®)) or placebo nightly, and 2 weeks' placebo run-out. Outcome measures included daily voice recorded sleep diary, Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), WHO-Five Well-being Index (WHO-5), and safety. RESULTS: Mean nightly sleep duration improved by 43 minutes in the PRM and 16 minutes in the placebo group (mean difference: 27 minutes, 95% CI: -14.4 to 69 minutes; P=0.18; effect size: 0.82) meeting the primary endpoint. Mean sleep latency decreased by 29 minutes with PRM over placebo (P=0.13; effect size: 0.92) and nap duration decreased in the PRM but not placebo group. The variability in sleep onset/offset and latency tended to decrease during PRM but not placebo treatment. The potentially beneficial effects of PRM persisted during the 2 weeks of discontinuation period, consistent with clock stabilizing effects. PRM was well-tolerated, adverse events were of mild or moderate severity and similar between PRM and placebo. CONCLUSION: Nightly use of PRM may potentially improve patient-reported sleep difficulties in totally blind individuals trying to adhere to normal social lifestyle. A larger study powered to demonstrate a statistically significant effect is warranted.
ABSTRACT
Surveillance studies are useful to evaluate how a new medicinal product performs in everyday treatment and how the patient who takes it feels and functions, thereby determining the benefit/risk ratio of the drug under real-life conditions. Prolonged-release melatonin (PRM; Circadin) was approved in Europe for the management of primary insomnia patients age 55 years or older suffering from poor quality of sleep. With traditional hypnotics (e.g. benzodiazepine-receptor agonists), there are concerns about rebound insomnia and/or withdrawal symptoms. We report data from a postmarketing surveillance study in Germany on the effects of 3 weeks of treatment with PRM on sleep in patients with insomnia during treatment and at early (1-2 days) and late (around 2 weeks) withdrawal. In total, 653 patients (597 evaluable) were recruited at 204 sites (mean age 62.7 years, 68% previously treated with hypnotics, 65% women). With PRM treatment, the mean sleep quality (on a scale of 1-5 on which 1 is very good and 5 is very bad) improved from 4.2 to 2.6 and morning alertness improved from 4.0 to 2.5. The improvements persisted over the post-treatment observation period. Rebound insomnia, defined as a one-point deterioration in sleep quality below baseline values, was found in 3.2% (early withdrawal) and 2.0% (late withdrawal). Most of the patients (77%) who used traditional hypnotics before PRM treatment had stopped using them and only 5.6% of naive patients started such drugs after PRM discontinuation. PRM was well tolerated during treatment and the most frequently reported adverse events were nausea (10 patients, 1.5%), dizziness, restlessness and headache (five patients each, <1%). There were no serious adverse events and no adverse events were reported after discontinuation. The persisting treatment effect and very low rebound rate suggest a beneficial role of sleep-wake cycle stabilization with PRM in the treatment of insomnia.
Subject(s)
Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Melatonin/therapeutic use , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Sleep/drug effects , Aged , Delayed-Action Preparations , Female , Germany , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Male , Melatonin/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Patient Safety , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/diagnosis , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Wakefulness/drug effectsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Insomnia is typified by a difficulty in sleep initiation, maintenance and/or quality (non-restorative sleep) resulting in significant daytime distress. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the available efficacy and safety data for drugs currently in the pipeline for treating insomnia. Specifically, the authors performed MEDLINE and internet searches using the keywords 'Phase II' and 'insomnia'. The drugs covered target GABAA (zaleplon-CR, lorediplon, EVT-201), orexin (filorexant, MIN-202), histamine-H1 (LY2624803), serotonin 5-HT2A (ITI-007), melatonin/serotonin5-HT1A (piromelatine) and melatonin (indication expansions of prolonged-release melatonin and tasimelteon for pediatric sleep and circadian rhythm disorders) receptors. EXPERT OPINION: Low-priced generic environments and high development costs limit the further development of drugs that treat insomnia. However, the bidirectional link between sleep and certain comorbidities may encourage development of specific drugs for comorbid insomnia. New insomnia therapies will most likely move away from GABAAR receptors' modulation to more subtle neurological pathways that regulate the sleep-wake cycle.
Subject(s)
Drug Design , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Drugs, Investigational/adverse effects , Drugs, Investigational/pharmacology , Drugs, Investigational/therapeutic use , GABA Modulators/adverse effects , GABA Modulators/pharmacology , GABA Modulators/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Receptors, GABA-A/drug effects , Receptors, GABA-A/metabolism , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/physiopathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: A link between poor sleep quality and Alzheimer's disease (AD) has recently been suggested. Since endogenous melatonin levels are already reduced at preclinical AD stages, it is important to ask whether replenishing the missing hormone would be beneficial in AD and whether any such effects would be related to the presence of sleep disorder in patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The effects of add-on prolonged-release melatonin (PRM) (2 mg) to standard therapy on cognitive functioning and sleep were investigated in 80 patients (men [50.7%], women [49.3%], average age 75.3 years [range, 52-85 years]) diagnosed with mild to moderate AD, with and without insomnia comorbidity, and receiving standard therapy (acetylcholinesterase inhibitors with or without memantine). In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients were treated for 2 weeks with placebo and then randomized (1:1) to receive 2 mg of PRM or placebo nightly for 24 weeks, followed by 2 weeks placebo. The AD Assessment Scale-Cognition (ADAS-Cog), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), sleep, as assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and a daily sleep diary, and safety parameters were measured. RESULTS: Patients treated with PRM (24 weeks) had significantly better cognitive performance than those treated with placebo, as measured by the IADL (P=0.004) and MMSE (P=0.044). Mean ADAS-Cog did not differ between the groups. Sleep efficiency, as measured by the PSQI, component 4, was also better with PRM (P=0.017). In the comorbid insomnia (PSQI ≥6) subgroup, PRM treatment resulted in significant and clinically meaningful effects versus the placebo, in mean IADL (P=0.032), MMSE score (+1.5 versus -3 points) (P=0.0177), and sleep efficiency (P=0.04). Median ADAS-Cog values (-3.5 versus +3 points) (P=0.045) were significantly better with PRM. Differences were more significant at longer treatment duration. PRM was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSION: Add-on PRM has positive effects on cognitive functioning and sleep maintenance in AD patients compared with placebo, particularly in those with insomnia comorbidity. The results suggest a possible causal link between poor sleep and cognitive decline.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Cognition/drug effects , Melatonin/administration & dosage , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Sleep/drug effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/complications , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Delayed-Action Preparations , Dopamine Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Memantine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Placebos , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/complications , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The neurexin genes (NRXN1/2/3) encode two families (α and ß) of highly polymorphic presynaptic proteins that are involved in excitatory/inhibitory synaptic balance. Recent studies indicate that neuronal activation and memory formation affect NRXN1/2/3α expression and alternative splicing at splice sites 3 and 4 (SS#3/SS#4). Neurons in the biological clock residing in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of the hypothalamus (SCN) act as self-sustained oscillators, generating rhythms in gene expression and electrical activity, to entrain circadian bodily rhythms to the 24 hours day/night cycles. Cell autonomous oscillations in NRXN1/2/3α expression and SS#3/SS#4 exons splicing and their links to rhythms in excitatory/inhibitory synaptic balance in the circadian clock were explored. NRXN1/2/3α expression and SS#3/SS#4 splicing, levels of neurexin-2α and the synaptic scaffolding proteins PSD-95 and gephyrin (representing excitatory and inhibitory synapses, respectively) were studied in mRNA and protein extracts obtained from SCN of C3H/J mice at different times of the 24 hours day/night cycle. Further studies explored the circadian oscillations in these components and causality relationships in immortalized rat SCN2.2 cells. Diurnal rhythms in mNRXN1α and mNRXN2α transcription, SS#3/SS#4 exon-inclusion and PSD-95 gephyrin and neurexin-2α levels were found in the SCN in vivo. No such rhythms were found with mNRXN3α. SCN2.2 cells also exhibited autonomous circadian rhythms in rNRXN1/2 expression SS#3/SS#4 exon inclusion and PSD-95, gephyrin and neurexin-2α levels. rNRXN3α and rNRXN1/2ß were not expressed. Causal relationships were demonstrated, by use of specific siRNAs, between rNRXN2α SS#3 exon included transcripts and gephyrin levels in the SCN2.2 cells. These results show for the first time dynamic, cell autonomous, diurnal rhythms in expression and splicing of NRXN1/2 and subsequent effects on the expression of neurexin-2α and postsynaptic scaffolding proteins in SCN across the 24-h cycle. NRXNs gene transcripts may have a role in coupling the circadian clock to diurnal rhythms in excitatory/inhibitory synaptic balance.
Subject(s)
Biological Clocks/genetics , Circadian Rhythm/genetics , Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules/genetics , Synapses/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic , Alternative Splicing , Animals , Biological Clocks/drug effects , Calcium-Binding Proteins , Carrier Proteins/metabolism , Cell Line , Central Nervous System Depressants/pharmacology , Circadian Rhythm/drug effects , Disks Large Homolog 4 Protein , Guanylate Kinases/metabolism , Male , Melatonin/pharmacology , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred C3H , Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules/metabolism , Period Circadian Proteins/genetics , Protein Transport , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Rats , Suprachiasmatic Nucleus/drug effects , Suprachiasmatic Nucleus/metabolismABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Sleep is a vital neurochemical process involving sleep-promoting and arousal centers in the brain. Insomnia is a pervasive disorder characterized by difficulties in initiating or maintaining or non-refreshing (poor quality) sleep and clinically significant daytime distress. Insomnia is more prevalent in women and old age and puts sufferers at significant physical and mental health risks. This review summarizes published data on the current and emerging insomnia drug classes, rationale for development and associated risks/benefits. (Summary of Product Characteristics and Medline search on "hypnotic" or specific drug names and "Insomnia"). AREAS COVERED: GABA(A) receptor modulators facilitate sleep onset and some improve maintenance but increase risk of dependence, memory, cognitive and psychomotor impairments, falls, accidents and mortality. Melatonin receptor agonists improve quality of sleep and/or sleep onset but response may develop over several days. They have more benign safety profiles and are indicated for milder insomnia, longer usage and (prolonged release melatonin) older patients. Histamine H-1 receptor antagonists improve sleep maintenance but their effects on cognition, memory and falls remain to be demonstrated. Late-stage pipeline orexin OX1/OX2 and serotonin 5HT2A receptor antagonists may hold the potential to address several unmet needs in insomnia pharmacotherapy but safety issues cast some doubts over their future. EXPERT OPINION: Current and new insomnia drugs in the pipeline target different sleep regulating mechanisms and symptoms and have different tolerability profiles. Drug selection would ideally be based on improvement in the quality of patients' sleep, overall quality of life and functional status weighed against risk to the individual and public health.
Subject(s)
Drug Discovery , GABA Modulators/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , GABA Modulators/administration & dosage , GABA Modulators/adverse effects , GABA Modulators/economics , Histamine H1 Antagonists/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists/adverse effects , Histamine H1 Antagonists/economics , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/economics , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Marketing , Neuropeptides/antagonists & inhibitors , Orexins , Receptors, GABA-A/metabolism , Receptors, Melatonin/agonists , Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists/economics , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Insomnia is common among the elderly. The use of hypnotic drugs in elderly patients is frequently criticized owing to dependency, cognitive impairments, falls and withdrawal effects. The production of melatonin, a physiological sleep and circadian rhythm regulator, declines with age. Prolonged-release melatonin (Circadin®), designed to mimic the endogenous pattern of melatonin production, is licensed for insomnia in patients aged ≥ 55 years. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes published studies on Circadin's efficacy and safety (Summary of Product Characteristics and Medline search on 'Circadin' and 'insomnia'). EXPERT OPINION: The main significant and clinically relevant benefits are improvements in sleep quality and latency, next-day morning alertness and quality of life. The responses may develop over several days. An oral 2-mg dose once daily, for 3 months, has generally been well tolerated with no rebound, withdrawal or 'hangover' effects and no safety concerns on concomitant therapy with antihypertensive, antidiabetic, lipid-lowering or anti-inflammatory drugs. Untoward effects of hypnotics on cognition, memory, postural stability and sleep structure are not seen with Circadin. Given as a first-line prescription, with 13 weeks' posology and the lack of rebound effects, Circadin has the potential to improve quality of life in insomnia patients aged 55 years and older and avoid long-term use of hypnotics.
Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/drug effects , Melatonin/administration & dosage , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Melatonin/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: A prolonged-release formulation of melatonin (PR-M) is indicated for insomnia in patients aged 55 years and older. Because hypnotics result in impairments of body sway, it was important to evaluate the effect of 2 mg PR-M on postural stability in older adults at night. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers (12 women, 12 men, aged 55-64 years) completed a randomized, double-blind, single-dose, three-way crossover study of postural stability of PR-M 2 mg, zolpidem 10 mg (active control) or placebo. Subjects were tested for body sway 30 min before, 1.5 and 4 h after dosing. Parameters tested were the area of the 95% confidence ellipse enclosing the center of pressure (COP; [A95]) and COP path length. RESULTS: Zolpidem significantly increased the A95 (both eyes conditions at all time points) and path length of COP. PR-M had no effect on A95 (both "eyes closed" and "eyes open" conditions at all time points) compared with placebo and increased COP path length by 10% at 4 h post-dose in open but not closed eyes condition. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In older adults, evening PR-M intake did not impair postural stability during the night. The postural instability with zolpidem demonstrated assay sensitivity and validated the outcome.
Subject(s)
Antioxidants/administration & dosage , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Melatonin/administration & dosage , Postural Balance/drug effects , Pyridines/pharmacology , Analysis of Variance , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , ZolpidemABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Add-on prolonged-release melatonin (PRM) in antihypertensive therapy has been shown to ameliorate nocturnal hypertension. Hypertension is a major comorbidity among insomnia patients. The efficacy and safety of PRM for primary insomnia in patients aged 55 years and older who are treated with antihypertensive drugs were evaluated. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of pooled antihypertensive drug-treated subpopulations from four randomized, double-blind trials of PRM and placebo for 3 weeks (N[PRM] = 195; N[placebo] = 197) or 28 weeks (N[PRM] = 157; N[placebo] = 40). Efficacy measurements included Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire scores of quality of sleep and alertness and behavioral integrity the following morning after 3 weeks, and sleep latency (daily sleep diary) and Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) after 6 months of treatment. Safety measures included antihypertensive drug-treated subpopulations from these four and three additional single-blind and open-label PRM studies of up to 1 year (N[PRM] = 650; N[placebo] = 632). RESULTS: Quality of sleep and behavior following wakening improved significantly with PRM compared with placebo (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0008, respectively). Sleep latency (P = 0.02) and CGI-I (P = 0.0003) also improved significantly. No differences were observed between PRM and placebo groups in vital signs, including daytime blood pressure at baseline and treatment phases. The rate of adverse events normalized per 100 patient-weeks was lower for PRM (3.66) than for placebo (8.53). CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate substantive and sustained efficacy of PRM in primary insomnia patients treated with antihypertensive drugs. PRM appears to be safe for insomnia in patients with cardiovascular comorbidity.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with nocturnal hypertension are at higher risk for cardiovascular complications such as myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular insult. Published studies inconsistently reported decreases in nocturnal blood pressure with melatonin. METHODS: A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of exogenous melatonin in ameliorating nocturnal blood pressure was performed using a random effects model of all studies fitting the inclusion criteria, with subgroup analysis of fast-release versus controlled-release preparations. RESULTS: Seven trials (three of controlled-release and four of fast-release melatonin) with 221 participants were included. Meta-analysis of all seven studies did not reveal significant effects of melatonin versus placebo on nocturnal blood pressure. However, subgroup analysis revealed that controlled-release melatonin significantly reduced nocturnal blood pressure whereas fast-release melatonin had no effect. Systolic blood pressure decreased significantly with controlled-release melatonin (-6.1 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.7 to -1.5; P = 0.009) but not fast-release melatonin (-0.3 mmHg; 95% CI -5.9 to 5.30; P = 0.92). Diastolic blood pressure also decreased significantly with controlled-release melatonin (-3.5 mmHg; 95% CI -6.1 to -0.9; P = 0.009) but not fast-release melatonin (-0.2 mmHg; 95% CI -3.8 to 3.3; P = 0.89). No safety concerns were raised. CONCLUSION: Add-on controlled-release melatonin to antihypertensive therapy is effective and safe in ameliorating nocturnal hypertension, whereas fast-release melatonin is ineffective. It is necessary that larger trials of longer duration be conducted in order to determine the long-term beneficial effects of controlled-release melatonin in patients with nocturnal hypertension.
Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Circadian Rhythm , Hypertension/drug therapy , Melatonin/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Adult , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Delayed-Action Preparations , Drug Therapy, Combination , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Melatonin/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a major comorbidity in insomnia patients. The efficacy and safety of prolonged-release melatonin 2 mg in the treatment of glucose, lipid metabolism, and sleep was studied in 36 type 2 diabetic patients with insomnia (11 men, 25 women, age 46-77 years). METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, the subjects were treated for 3 weeks (period 1) with prolonged-release melatonin or placebo, followed by a one-week washout period, and then crossed over for another 3 weeks (period 2) of treatment with the other preparation. All tablets were taken 2 hours before bedtime for a period of 3 weeks. In an extension period of 5 months, prolonged-release melatonin was given nightly to all patients in an open-label design. Sleep was objectively monitored in a subgroup of 22 patients using wrist actigraphy. Fasting glucose, fructosamine, insulin, C-peptide, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and some antioxidants, as well as glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were measured at baseline and at the end of the study. All concomitant medications were continued throughout the study. RESULTS: No significant changes in serum glucose, fructosamine, insulin, C-peptide, antioxidant levels or blood chemistry were observed after 3 weeks of prolonged-release melatonin treatment. Sleep efficiency, wake time after sleep onset, and number of awakenings improved significantly with prolonged-release melatonin as compared with placebo. Following 5 months of prolonged-release melatonin treatment, mean HbA1c (±standard deviation) was significantly lower than at baseline (9.13% ± 1.55% versus 8.47% ± 1.67%, respectively, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Short-term use of prolonged-release melatonin improves sleep maintenance in type 2 diabetic patients with insomnia without affecting glucose and lipid metabolism. Long-term prolonged-release melatonin administration has a beneficial effect on HbA1c, suggesting improved glycemic control.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prolonged-release melatonin (PRM) 2 mg is indicated for insomnia in patients aged 55 years and older. A recent double-blind placebo-controlled study demonstrated 6-month efficacy and safety of PRM in insomnia patients aged 18-80 and lack of withdrawal and rebound symptoms upon discontinuation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, safety, and withdrawal phenomena associated with 6-12 months PRM treatment. METHODS: Data from a prospective 6-12-month open-label study of 244 community dwelling adults with primary insomnia, who had participated in a placebo-controlled, double-blind dose-ranging trial of PRM. Patients received PRM nightly, followed by a 2-week withdrawal period. Main outcome measures were patient-reported sleep quality ratings (diary), adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory tests recorded at each visit, and withdrawal symptoms (CHESS-84 [Check-list Evaluation of Somatic Symptoms]). Nocturnal urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin excretion, a measure of the endogenous melatonin production, was assessed upon discontinuing long-term PRM. RESULTS: Of the 244 patients, 36 dropped out, 112 completed 6 months of treatment, and the other 96 completed 12 months of treatment. The mean number of nights by which patients reported sleep quality as "good" or "very good" was significantly higher during PRM than before treatment. There was no evidence of tolerance to PRM. Discontinuation of PRM was not associated with rebound insomnia or withdrawal symptoms; on the contrary, residual benefit was observed. PRM was well tolerated, and there was no suppression of endogenous melatonin production. CONCLUSION: Results support the efficacy and safety of PRM in primary insomnia patients aged 20-80 throughout 6-12 months of continuous therapy. PRM discontinuation even after 12 months was not associated with adverse events, withdrawal symptoms, or suppression of endogenous melatonin production.